The High Court · 2025

Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to rssue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the Respondent No.5 in non-following the provisions of Section 35 (3) of B.N.S.S. Act and non-initiating to implement the directions of the Honourabre Apex court in Arnesh Kumar V/s. state of Bihar and trying to arrest the petitioner in crime No. 1015 of 2o25 for the offences under Section 316(2), 318(4),352,351 (2) BNS, dated 11.07.2025 on the fire of Porice station, Miyapur without issuing any notice under section 35 (3) of B N S.S. by coiluding with the Respondent No.6, is iregar, arbitrary, u nconstitution a I and violation of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 300_4 of Constitution of lndia and a{so viotation of Principles of Naturat Justice and consequenty direcr the Respondent No 5 to follow the provisions under Section 35 (3) of B N S S' Act or follow the directions of the Honourable Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar V/s State of Bihar lA NO: 1 oF 2025 petition under section 15.1 Cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to ct the Respondent No 5 to follow the provisions under Section 35 (3) of .S.S. Act or follow the directions of the Honourable Apex Court in Arnesh B.N KumarV/s.StateofBiharpendingdisposaloftheWritPetition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU B[A?K|$. il;;i iI. ii.'" n".pond;;h-';"1r"o-i' snr c'nNlKErH REDDY' AGP FoR Counsel for the ResPondent No'6: -- The Court made the following: ORDER 1 : t ; I THE HONOURABLE SRTIUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR PETITION No.29547 of2 02s ORDER: Heard Iearneci counsel learned Assistant Governnren Nos.1 to 5. Witlt their. consent, at the admission stage itself. for the petitioner anci Sri.G.Aniketh Reddy, t Pleader for Home appearing for respondcnt this writ petition is being taken up lor clisposal

2. ^t., Ttris writ petition has been filed seeking ttre following prayer:_ 'lo ,ltr ltrrt llrr. lltsDott,l,,ttr S.er ti,nt 3ir ,,' nj'';P:,"!.':" ,N.o ' t.tt tton-loll,tu'ing lln' prouisiotr> 1tI tron'rrtitiuting ro ttttptetnettt ttr ,t,,,, r,,,,ii uJ rt,,'l ,i",i,i,:i,io,!'l .:rtt't K,r,,,,oy vh srnt,. ol rtilrrrr trt ,r tryitrg,t,, ui",rt','il.r,),,,,,,i,I.,1, ,ir!;,t|, ( rinr No. t0 t5 of 2025 [or ttr olkn*s- ,, ia,., ii,i),,"'.' ,:,'::'u_:1,' .:.,, isz, syrzj";;;: ;;,;; t r 07 t02r ,,, ,,,, i'[]i,/J,i,,,,"llljl),,,tr^1,1!: notite rrnder s,irio,, tir:si ;;,;.,;.;:;rou:,:,,. ::,,,,,:.o,1, issuing trny Rrspondcnl No.6 is itt",,t li.r.,il-.^1''u't't' .oy colluding with llte Artictes t4, rr, rr"',lf!r'' ii,!,1,,:'!;un-constiiutnnnr,"i"i,i,i,"r"ir ;:;';'::,:,y,,;:,r,,;!,;,it, i1,,',),7,,,i'i!i'i,,i|",1,',;,:;,';l;; o/ n rv : , a, i ;;i,!l:? ): in Artrslr krutrnr V/, 5trtlr of Bilnr.,, Y:ri:i ;;:'i:;i;!;":::;;;,:l;: ii':; . ) ,,,\ t lu, ;:,i!,,r,;2 3 Brief facts statecl in this writ petition are that petitioner has estabrishecr immigration se^,ice centre under narne an siyle of ,,S.N.p Technologies,, ancl since 2014' pctiiioner is working as imrnigration consurtant in his services cenLre. It is further submitted that in the year 2022, respondent No.6 approachcd the petitio^er a,d requested ro pro'ide immigration services and the peHtioner has completed thc entire process of imntgration. Developing faith in the petitioner and services, respondent No.6 used to bring crients to petitiorcr's office ancr the same was processecl by the petitioner. The case of ^is 2 ,\ the petitioncl is that respondent No 6 createtl somc fakc documents regat-ding French language and skill certificates ancl the samc was hancled over to the petitioner for process of visa for clffcrent countrics' holvcver' the satnc was -I'hcre'aftcr' respondent rejected anci thc clients clemanded tl-rcir tlroncv back' No.6 rvith an intentlon to grab the uroLrc\ fronr the petitioner' Iodgcd a complaint before responcicnt No'5 rr'ith falsc allcgation and subsequcr-rtly' Crinre No.1015 of 2025 dated 1'1 07 2025' for the offences under Section 316(2)' 318(4), 352, 351(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita' 2023 (l'rerein after referrecl as 'BNSS') u'as replistcrccl Furthcr casc of the petitioner ls that the rcspontlcnt No'5 is threaterlinc the Lretitioncr to scttle thc disputl' rvitl-r respondeut No.6 and is harassini; the pctitioner to pav monev to the respondent No 6. Aggrieved, by the same this writ petition is filed' .1. Learnecl Assistant Govcrnment Plcacler for I [ome appearing for respottdet-rt Nos.l to 5 placcd ott rctt'l'cl instructions issued bv SubJnspector of Policc, Miyapur Police Station, Cvbcrbacl Commissionerate' wherein it is submitteti tlrirt on rcsponclcnt No 6 complaint datccl '11'07 2025 ' Crirne No'1015of2025c1ated11.07'2025,r,r.asregisteredanddetailedstaten-rentof recordecl. During the coursc of enquiry, the respondent No.6 was investigation olficer z't1e letter dated 22.09.2025 requcsted the Manager, HDFC Bank, Mivapur, to furnish bank statement of rcspondent Nos.6 and the same was fun-rished. Thcrcafter, investigation officer tried to issue notice urder section 3;(3) or BNSS to the petitioner. it is further submittcd tl_Lat :.'t .:.,. 4--rz: ;/ rnstead of approaclling to thc writ petition lnvestigating office, petitioner had filed this

5. Lcarned Assistant Gor.ernment p.lcader for Home further submits that the investigating officer is taking efforts to complete the investigation in Cr.ime No.1015 of 2025 clated 17.07.2025and in ihis connectiory investigating officer e'en tried to issue notice under Scction 35(3) of BNSS and ,.; Court to direct the pedtioner to co_operate with the investigation pencling in Crime No.1015 of 2025 ciared 11.07.2025. ,;r" 6 Flaving colrsiclcletr trrc above facts and circumstance and without expressing any opinion or the rnerits of rrre casc, trris writ petition is disposecr of directing petitioner to approach rcspondent No.5 on 26.09.2025at 3.00 pm and the respondent No.S is directed to serve notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS to thc petitio^cr and con'uct investigation by forowing due procedure as contemprated under raw rt is arso made crear trrat thc peiitio,er sha, co- operate wiih the investigation in FIR No.1015 of 2025 dated 17.07.2025. 7 With the aLrove clirection, this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to SD/. V.KAVITHA DEPUW REGISTRAR I I //TRUE COPY// Hyderabad, State of Telangana G SECTION OFFICER 1. The Principal Secreta ry, Home Department, Secretariat Buildin g, Secretariat, 2. The Director Genera I of Police, Telangana Hyderabad 3. The Commissioner of Police Cyberabad, Cyberabad C om m iss ionerate, Hlderaba( \. \\eDePu\ C0rnrntsstonet o\ P o\ae , Madhaput D\\\s\on , cvberabad yapur Police Station, CYberabad derabad Commissio nerate, Hy Mt Commisstonerate. Hvderahad House Otticer

5. The Statton ' ' - '1 ' ?$' - t ft_f',?tl{ t tt'fl::t"-- !_-'t':trr''. "va"t*t"'@ '"""!l'2tt \ \ To \(tN T i E li'[f B ii"""? il.? t 3;t'""] r e I a n g a n a' at il: 3 3 Jiis i Hf h 3 Hvderabad. IOU ll Two CD CoPies ^? C) 7 8 PSK. PSK. 4, CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED:25109/2025 1 ORDER WP.No.29547 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I : I q ?>