The High Court · 2025

flepresented by its Commissioner, Swarna Jayanti Comptex, S.R. Nagar, Srinivasa Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad - 500d38. Telanlana,

3. THE NAGARAM MUNICIPALITY, Represented by its Commissioner, Nagaram Village, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

4. SHARAD KUMAR MISRA, S/o Jyoti Prakash Misra, Aged tv,tajor, Occ. Business, R:/o. H.No.12-10-5211, Seethaphalmandi, Secundeiabad, Hyderabad-500061 .

5. KOPPALLI NAGENDRA BABU, S/o Subbarayudu, Aged lr4ajor, Occ. Business, R/o. H. No.'12-10-52l1 , Seethaphalmandi, Secund6rabad, Hyderabad-50006 1 .

6. SMT GURRAM NAGALAKSHMI, Wo VENKATESWARLU, Aged rvrajor, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H.No.1 2-1 0-5211, Seethaphalmandi, Secund6rabad,- Hyderabad-500061 .

7. SMT PETTUGANI VENKATA SUJAIHA, W/o VENKATESWARLU, Aged lajor, Occ. Housewife, Rl/o. H.No.i2-10-5211, Seethaphalmandi, Secunderabad, Hyderabad-500061 . I,A.NO: 20 F 2025 ....RESPONDENTS Petition Under section 15,, cPC praying that in the cirr;umstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court rnay be preased to susPEND the order Dated'16/09/2025 in w.p. No.22495 0F 20250n the fire of Honoura ble Single Judge. l.A.NO:3 o F 2025 Petition Under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circrrnstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court nray be preased to direct the Respondent Nos. 4 to 7 not to proceed for further ccnstruction ti, the disposar of Representation Dated 24ro7 /2025 pending for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 pending disposal of the above writ appeal. Counsel for Appeilant : SRt .C.RAGHU, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY 3:Ul.r"lj"J^i.Tpondent No.1 : Gp FoR McpL ADMN AND uRBAN Counsel for Respondent No.2 : SRI V.NARASIMHA GOUD Counsel for Respondent No.3 : SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 to 7 : SRI JALLI KANAKAIAH The Court made the following JUDGMENT : - THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL NO.1084 OF 2025 Mr.C.Raghu, lcarned Senior Counsel rcprcscnting Mr.K Pradeep Red(l\, learned counsel appearing for thc appel)ant. Mr.lirishna Rcdd) Putta, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for rhe res pondent No.3. Mr.Jalli Kanakaih, learnr:d Senior Counscl appearing for the responcli'ut Nos .+ to 7. JUDGMENT: ( l)cr I l on't)]e .Ju stice Illou sh umi B ha( t.rclta r,\.r ) l. Wc l-ravc heard learned Senior Counsel appcaring fbr tirc appellant, lcarneci Senior Counsel appearing lor the respondent Nos..1 to 7 and the learned SLanding Counscl appcaring lor thc rcspondcnt No.3

2. The Appcal was filcd challenging the order daLeci i6.O9.2025 passcd in W.P.No.22495 of 2025. The appcllant had filed W.P.No.22495 of 2025 against the inaction of the resporrdcnts, in particular Lhc respondent Nos.2 and 3, 1l-I not considering the appclJanL's Representation ciatccl

24.07 .2025 containing a request for cancellation of thc buiiding permission dated 08.07.2025 bearing No.00080,t/BPlHMDAl02lT lGF\Tl2025 granted by the respondent Nos.2 and 3 jn favour of the rcspor-rdent Nos'1 2 -t to 7 on the ground that such permission had bccn obtained br, suppression and misrepresen tzLtion of or-dcr datcd 10.01 .2O2O in I.A.No.3856 of 2Ol9 ir_: O.g.1,1o.aa, u, 2Ol9 on thc file ol the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Medchal-Malka.1giri District at Medchal granting status quo ti11 filing of counter \,",ith respect to changing the nature of thc petition scltedule propcrl,\,.

3. By the impugned orclcr dated 16.O9.2O2..t. the learned Single Judge disposed of thc \,Vrir petition ri.hilc permitting the appellarlt to proceed ri'ith the implea,cment of the respondenL Nos.ul to 7 in a pcnding Suit lC).S.No.332 ol 2019) filed bl the appellant for declaration and recoven.of possession of the suit schedule properry but declining to rcstrain tl-rc respondent Nos.4 to 7 from procceding ,,r.ith furlher construction in the subjcct propcrt-\.. .J.he appclJarnt u,as also given libertl, to pursue I.A.No.3SSC, ol 2019 filed in thc said Suit seeking ad inteim injunt tron orders or other interlocutory applications, restraining tn,: respondent Nos.4 to 7 from proceeding u.ith further conslrurction anrl thereafter, approach the respondenl ,'J,:.3 Nagaram Municipalitv for cancellation of building yrcrmission or -/' I I 3 kceping in abe_vance the building permission granted to the rcspondent Nos..l to 7 ir-r casc such a restraint order is passed. The I Additior-ral Junior Civil Judge, .Medchal_ Malkalgiri District u'as also directed to dispose of the application in LA.No.3856 ()l 20 l9 or any other application filcd b,r' the appellant seeking injunction, within one monrh lrom the dare of receipt oI a cop_v of that order. :1. Wc do not lind an_\i reason for the appellanr bcing aggricvcd b-l, the impugned order since admittedlr., ir-r spitc of the first suit in O.S.No.72 1 ot 1996 filed secking dcclaral-ion ol title and perpetual injunction in the Court ol VI Additiorral Scnior Civil .Iudge, Medchal, Ranga Redd-r District having been dismtssed on I O.lt.2Ol7, Lhe seconcl Suit in O.S.No.332 of 2019, filed in 2O19, is srill pcnding as on date before the learned XVI Additional District.Iudge. Ranga Rcdd_., District ar Malkajgiri

5. Thc (lourt is informed that the appellant has alreadr liled an implead petition to bring the respondent Nos.4 to 7 on record in the suir in O.S.No.332 ol 2079.

6. We arc of the considcrcd vier.r, that the appellant's cff'ective rcmcdy lrrr restrainillg the respondents frorn I v further coltstruction,' lies in pursuing Lhr: 1;r nciing Suit and the I.A. liled thcrcin 7 . Nonc of thc appellant,s rights ha'c ,r.c^ alfecLed br the imprrgned ordcr cjatcd 16.09.2025. 8. There.fore, t hr: impugned order pzrsscrl bl the learned Single Jucige datcd 16.Og.2025 does not u,arranr an\. interference.

9. W.A.No.l084 ot 2025, along ri.itl.r :rll connected applications. is :r ct:o rcl ingl-r. disposed of ir) Lerms oI thr: above. 'l'het-e shali ltc no ordcr as to costs. //TRUE COPY// , bo,- A.v.s.PRASAD DEPUW REgrsrFnn .SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal ,Administration and Urban Development, Hyderabad, Telangana State Of Teld,ngara at Secretariate. 2, The CommissioneT, HYDERABAD METROPOLITAN DEVELOPIVENT AUTHORITY, Swarna Jayanti Complex, S.R. Nagar, S'inivasa Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad - 500038. Telangana.

3. The Commissioner, NAGARAM tUUNICIPALITY, Nagar:rm Village, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

4. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADIUN AND URBAN DEV=I-OPMENT, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 5. One CC to SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY, Advocate IOPUC] 6. One CC to SRI V.NARASIiMHA GOUD, Advocate (OPtJC) 7. One CC to SRI JALLI KANAKAIAH, Advocate (OPUC) 8. One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, Advocate ((l'UC) 9. Two CD Copies To SA \e HIGH COURT DATED:2411012025 JUDGMENT WA.No.1084 of 2025 ,1 _/./. () IlrE S14 14: e ) ,' r) (' : (,- .i 04 il0ll il6 €s., ar crEQ ,i DISPOSING OF THE W.A WITHOUT COSTS. qF \\ 6y €