✦ High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025

One CC to Sri v. Manohar Rao

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Sep 2025
Length
1,257 words

1. Shyam Kumar, S/o.Karrenna, age 36 years 2. Harijan Janumpally Anand,, S/o.Sayanna, age 73 years 3. Golla Tirupathaiah, S/o.pentaiah, age 53 years 4. A.Bal Reddy, S/o.A.BaL Chandr:a Reddy, age 4g years 5. P.Boya Balaswamy,, S/o.Balaiah, age 62 years 6. Golla Nakka Srinu, S/o.Balaiah, age 53 years 7. Madhu, S/o.Kurmanna, age 36 years L Ravi, S/o.Kurmanna, age 35 years 9. Harijan Janumpally Balaiah,, S/o.Anand, age 4g years 10.Atkula Sunitha, Wo.Bhaskar Reddy, age 45 years 11. Shekar, S/o.Kurmanna, age 32 years 12.J.Venkatamma, W/o.Ramulu, age S0 years .13. Govindamma, D/o.Kurmanna, age 45 years R/oKanayapalli Vilatge, pebbair Mandat, wanaparthy District. AND ...PETITIONERS Department, Secretariat, Saifab'aO, gVOeiSG

1. The state of relangana, B"p-. Fv its. principal secretary trrigation and cAD ' I3:':,'31,:i5lfl?x3s,E;'[T;oi"il,".5l$i8"r secretarv Finance Department 3. The chief commissioner Land Acquisition, Nampally, Hyderabad. 4. The District Collector, Wanaparthy District. 5. The ip-ry,it.P"puty coltgctor (LA/ r end Acquisition officer, p.J.p. Gadwear now RLISP-ll, Pebbair, Wana$arthy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumsternces stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased tr issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not depositingt compensation amounts to the Petitioners as per Judgment and Decree in o'P.No zss' 2s4, 217, 232, 222, 1gB, 243, 244, 2s2, 231, 242, 240 and 241 of 2012 dated 22-02-2013 and E.p.No. 1Ts, 199, 31 9 of 2024 and 305, 310, 325, 326' 327 ' 328' 340,342, 353 and 379 of 2025 on the fiie of the Senior Civil Judge at wanap,rthy as modified by this Hon'bre court in L.A.A.s.No.491 , 3go, 3r2, 520,504, {;09, 514 of 2016, 1 of 2012, s12, s21, 539, s29 of2016 and 12 of 2017 as illegal, ;arbitrary and violative of Article 300-A of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents No.1 to 5 herein to deposit the decreetal amounts to the credit of o.p.No.zss,2s4, z1r,232,222, 1gg,243,244,zsz,231, 242,240 ard 241 of 2012 dated 22_02_2013. IA :1Ot: Petitirln under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respontlents No.1 to 5 herein to deposit the decreetal amounts as per the Judgment arrd decree in o.p.No.2ss, 2s4, 217, 232, 222, 1gg, 243, 244, zsz, 231, 242,24o an<r 241 of 2012 dated 22-o2-2013 and E.p.No. 1Ts, 199, 31 9 of 2024 and 305, 31a,32s,926,327,328,34o,342,3s3 and 379 of 202son the fire of the senior civil Judge at wanaparthy pending disposar of the main writ petition. Counsel for the petitioners: SRt V. MANOHAR RAO counsel forthe Respondent no.1: Gp FoR rRRr AND coMM AREA DEV counsel for flre Respondent No.2: AGp FoR FINANCE AND PLANNING counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 5: AGp FoR LAND AceurstiloN The Court marJe the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No-29267 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners anci Learned Assistant Government Pleacler for Irrigzrtion appearing for rcsponrlent No.1, Learnecl Assistant Government for Financc ;rnd Plar.rning appcaring for respondent No.2 and learnecl Assistant Government Pleacler for Land acquisition appearing for respondent Nos.3 to 5. With the consent of the parties, tl're writ petition is being taken up for c{isposal at the atlrnission stage itself.

2. This writ petition is filcd seekirrg follor,ving praver: " to declnre the nctiott of tlrc Respondents itt ttot depositin.g compensntion ilnomtts !o llu' Petilioners fis per ludgnent nnd Decree in O.P.Nos. 255, 254, 217, 232, 222, '198, 243, 244, 252, 231, 242,240 nnd 241 of 2012 dated 22-02-2073 nnd E.P. Nos. 175, L99, 319 of 202a nttd 305, 3L0, 325, 326, 327, 328, 340, 342, 353, nnd 379 of 2025 on tlrc file o.f tlrc Senior Ciuil ludge. nt Wnnnpartlry ns modiferi by tlis Llonble Court in L.A.A.S .Nos.497, 390, 372, 520, 504, 509, 574, o.f 2075, 1 o.f 20'17, 512, 57'1, 539, 529 of 2016 and '12 of 20'17 ns illegnl nrbitrnry nnd t,iolnliua. of Article 300A of tlrc Constittttion of lttdin arul conscquerrthl direct llrc Respondents No 1 fo 5lrcreilt to dcltosit tlrc decrectnl uttor.utts to t!rc. creditof O.P Nos.255,254, 217,232, 222, 198, 243,244, 252,237, 242,240 md 24L of 2012 dnted 22-02-2013 nttd pass"

3. Today when the matter has bcen taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners suhmits that in sirnilal circumstaruce this Court in W.P.No.9394 of 2025 dated 28.03.2025, pnssed the following order:- u6. Recording tlu stbnission nmrlt. by lenrned counsel nppenring on eitlur side nnd in ternts of order passed by lltis Court in W.P.No.12837 of 2023 dated 28.04,2023, tlis rurit lalition is disposed of directing tlrc respondent tuttlnrities to deposit tlrc decreetnl nnrcunt in terms of tlrc order and decree, pnssed in O.P No.4 oj ?-020, by tlrc Senior Ciail ludge nt Gadtonl, to tlrc credit of E.P No.10 of 2023 itt O.P No.4 of 2020 on 2 I :r ':i the fle of senior Ciail ludge at Gadroal, ns expeditiottsly ns possible, at anrl rate utithin a period of four (4) ruontrrc from the dnie of receipt of a copy of this-order."

4. Lrlarned counsel for the petitioners further pray this Court to pass sinrilar orders as passed in w.p.No .9394 of 2025 clatcd 2g.03.202s. J 6' Lr:arned counsel appearing for resporldents ciicl not ciispute the sarnc Re corcling the submission made by learned counsel appearing on either sicle and in terms of order passed by this Court in W.p.No .g3g4 oi 2025 clareci 23'03'202:;, this writ petition is disposed of clirecting the rcsponclent authoritics to deposit the decreetal amount in terms of thc order ancl clccrce, passccl in O.p. Ncrs.255, .154, 217, 232, 22), 1gB, 242, 244, 2sz, 231, 242, 2rl0 and 247 of 2012 datcd 22'02.2A73, by the Senior Civil Judge at \{anaparth\,, to the creclit of E.lr. Nos.175, 799, 379 of z0z4 and E.p.N<is.305, 2L0, 3zs, 326, 327, 22g,340, 342, 353, a-nd 379 fi 2025 on the file of se^ior Civil Judge at wanaparthy, as cxpeditiously as possible, at any rate lvithin a periocl of four (04) rnor-rths frolr tl're date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7- Acc,rdingly, this writ petition is disposecl of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shalr stand closed. No order as to costs. //TRUE COPY// Sd/.M.JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The F'rincipal_Secretary lrrigation.and CAD Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, The S;tate of Telanganb, Hyderabad

2. The F'rincipal S_ecretary Fina.nce. Department Secretariat Buildings, The State of Telangana, Saifabad, Hyderabad

3. The Chief Commissioner Land Acquisition, Nampally, Hyderabad 4. The District Collector, Wanaparthy District. GiL

5. The iqgr,il.Pwuty coilector (LA)/ Land Acquisition officer, p.J.p. Gadweat now RLISP-Il, Pebbair, Wanafarthy District.

6. One CC to Sri V. Manohar Rao, Advocate [OpUC] 7. Two ccs to GP-for lrrigation and.command Area Development, High court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] wo cc to The GP for Finance and planning, High court for the state of elangana, at Hyderabad[OUT]

8.7 T

9. Two cc to The G.P fgr Lqld {cquisition, High court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad[OUT] '

10.Two CD Copies TJ PMK W HIGH COURT DATED:2410912025 ORDER WP.No.29267 of 2025 5 B 5 o TJ * $ g i'\F3 ?[?B + DISPOSING OF THE PETITION WITHCIUT COSTS .-l r<S alsl z-e ,

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments