✦ High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025

One CC to Sri v. Manohar Rao

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Sep 2025
Length
1,399 words

1. D.Telugu Balaraju, S/o.Satyanaryana, age 50 years 2. Buggapalli Srinu, S/o.Lal Singh, age 60 years 3. Daramoina Srinu, S/o.Chinna Naganna, age 63 years 4. D.Telugu Satyanarayana, S/o.Balaiah, age 75 years 5- Rajeswari, W/o.Sunder, age 40 yeats 6. D.Telugu Satyanarayana, S/o.Balaiah, age 75 years 7. Daramoina Vishnu, S/o.Chinna Naganna, age 55 years 8. Daramoina Ramulu, S/o.Chinna Naganna, age 65 years 9. Yellamma, Wo.Krishnaiah, age 42 years 10. Baini Rasomoni Yerranna, S/o.Kurmaiah, age 65 years 'l 1. D.Telugu Rama Raju, S/o.Satyanarayana, age 45 years l2.Daramoni Mahesh, S/o.Chinna Naganna, age 45 years 13. D.Krishnamma, W/o.Chinna Naganna, age 52 years 14. D.Venkatamma, W/o.Chinna Naganna, age 80 years 1 5. Vakiti Venkatesh, S/o.Lalu, age 45 years 16.Vakiti Narsimha, S/o.Narsimhulu, age 50 years R/oKanayapalli Vilalge, Pebbair Mandal, Wanaparthy District ...PETITIONERS AND

4. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary lrrigation and CAD Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Finance Department Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad The Chief Commissioner Land Acquisition, Nampally, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Wanaparthy District.

5. The Special Deputy Collector (LA)/ Land Acquisition Crl 'icer, P.J.P. Gadweal now RLISP-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lnr ia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th: High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction mor: particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not depositing compensation amounts to the Petitioners as per ,udgment and Decree in O.P.No.309, 292, 298, 300, 301, 299, 314, 306, 284, 2tl', 308, 310, 315, 3i1, '289 and 288 of 2013 dated 22-O4-2014 and E.P.No.'t42, '39 ot 2024 and 303, 313,314,315, 316 ,324,329,330, 343, 350, 354, 362,3? 1 and 371 of 2025 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanaparthy as modifiec by this Hon'ble Court in L.A.A.S.No.'1 75,261 of 2016,21 ol 2017,196,214,241 <t 2016,51,56of 2017, 268, 406, 253 ot 2016,38, 46, 49 ot 2017,236 and 262 of 2( 16 as illegat, arbitrary and violative of Article 300-4 of the constitution of lndia ar c consequenfly direct the Respondents No.'l to 5 herein to deposit the decreetal it tounts to the credit of O.P.No.309. 292 298, 300, 301, 299, 31 4, 306, 284, ZA7, a( B, 31 O, 31 5, 31 1, 289 and 2BB of 2O13 dated 22-04-2014. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court mz y be pleased to direct the Respondents No.1 to 5 herein to deposit the decreet;t amounts as per the Judgment and decree in O.P.No.309, 292,298,300, 30l, 29 t,314,306, 284,287, 308,310,31 5,31 1,289 and 288of 2013dated22-O4-2O1.1 and E.p.No.142,239 of 2024 and 303, 31 3, 31 4, 31 5, 316, 324, 329, 330, 343, iir 0, 354, 362, 371 and 377 o'f 2025 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Wanapa thy pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI V. MANOHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR tRRt AND COwII I AREA DEV Counsel for the Respondent N.2: AGP FOR FINANCE ANE, ,LANNING Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 5: AGp FOR LAND Ar ;eUISITION The Court made the following: ORDER // I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.29248 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation appearing for respondent No.1, Learned Assistant Government for Finance and Planning appearing for respondent No.2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land acquisition appearing for respondent Nos.3 to 5. With the consent of the parties, the writ petitkrn is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself

2. This r,vrit pctition is filcd seeking following prayer "to issue nn nppropriate utri| order or direction more partia arly one in the nntLu'e of Writ of MandnmtLs declaring thc action of the Respondents itr trot depositing compensation amounts to tlv Petitioners ns per ludgment and Decree in O.P No.309, 292, 298, 300, 301, 299, 314, 306,284,287, 308, 310, 3L5, 31L, 289 snd 288 of 2013 rlntcrl 22 01 20-14 ruul. E.P No. 742, 239 of 2024 and 303, 313, 311, 31s, 316, 324, 329, 3i0, 343, 350,354, 362, 37L nnd 377 of 2025 on tlrc lilc of tlu Senior Cittil ltLdge at Wanapartlty ns ntodified by tltis Hon'bb Cnurt in L.A.A.S. No. 775, 261, of 20L6, 21 of 2017, 196, 274, 241 of2016, 5L, 56 of2017,268, 406,253 of 2016, 38, 46, 49 of 2017, 236 nnd 262 of 2016 as illegal arbitrary and uioLattue of Article 300A of Lhe Constitution of lndia antl consequently dircct tlrc Respondents No 1 to 5 herein to deposit the decrectaL nnnunts to tle credit of O.P. No 309, 292, 298, 300, 301, 299, 314, 306, 284, 287, 308, 310, 3L5, 3LL, 289 ond 288 of 2073 dnted 22-04-2074" I \ 3- Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learncd counsel for the petitioners submits that in similar circumstance this Court in W.P.No.9394 of 2025 datcd 28.03.2025, passed the following order:- i "6. Recortlittg tlrc sfutnission made by learned counsel appenring on either side nnd ut lenns of order pnssetl lty tltis Court inW.P.No.12837 of 2023 dated 28.04.2023, this rurit petition is disposed of directing tle 2 ,au respondent thoritics to deposit tlu dtcreetal atm.u t in terms of the order and dzcree, pnssed in O.p No.4 of 2020, by the t nior Cioil iudge crcdit of E.p No.10 of 2023 in o. ) No.4 of 2020 in ,,! 9:!*:,;to .the the lle.oJ Senior Citil ludgc at Gadzpal, ns expeditiotL ly as possible, at any rate a p.eriod of four (4) months from tlrc t rie of receipt of a copy of this order." ,rrttthut I I I I

4. Learnecl counsel for the petitioners further pr ry this Court to pass similar orders as passcd in W.p.No.9394 of 2025 dated Z i.03.2025.

5. Learned counsel appearing for respondents clici I tt dispute the same.

6. Recorcling the submission made bv lcarned cou.r ;cl appearing on either side and in terms o[ orc{cr passecl bv this Court in \A.. ] No.9394 of 2025 clated 28'03'2025, this writ petition is disposed of directing trr,: respondent authorities to deposit the decrectal amount in ternrs of the order art decree, passed in O.p. Nos.309, 292,298,300,301, 299,374,306,2g1,287,308,3r t,315, 317,2ilgancl 288 of 2013 dated 22.04.20-14, ro rhe crcdir o[ E.,. Ncs.142 , 2? ) of 2024 andE.p. Nos 303, 313, 314, 315, 316, 32J, 329, 330,343, 350, 354,362,1 21 and 377 ot 2025 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge at WarnapartJr., as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of tbur (4) months r tm the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. Accordingly, rhis writ perition IS disposccl of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pencling, sl-rall stand closecl. No ordcr as to costs //TRUE COPY// Sd/. S. Ill ALLIKARJUNA RAO ASI; STAN'.REGISTRAR sechKru oFFrcER To

1. The Principal Secretary lrrigation and CAD Departmenl, Secretariat, Saifabad, The State of Telangana, Hyderabad

2. The Principal Secretary Finance Department Secretari: Buildings, The State of Telangana, The Saifabad, Hyderabad / I

3. The Chief Commissioner Land Acquisition, Nampally, Hyderabad. 4. The District Collector, Wanaparthy District. 5. The Special Deputy Collector (LA)/ Land Acquisition Officer, P.J.P. Gadweal now RLISP-ll, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District.

6. One CC to Sri V. Manohar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for lnigation and Command Area Development, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTJ

8. Two CC to The GP for Finance and Planning, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad[OUT]

9. Two CC to The GP for Land Acquisition, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad[OUT]

10.Two CD Copies TJ MP SY, HIGH GOURT DATED:2410912025 \ \ ORDER WP.No.29248 of 2025 n , / ..7:\ : --=: l--_ I L S rC,'-- (J 2S IAN 2026 z-o t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \E 9? A,4 1?

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments