✦ High Court of India · 17 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 17 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
17 Oct 2025
Length
1,848 words

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. ...Respondent 2. Vanita Bangray, w/o Hanumant Rao Bangray, Age: 55 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o Plot No, 27, Chaya Road No. 2, RTC Colony, Tirumalghiri, Secunderabad. ...RespondenUComplainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Complaint in C.C.No.3813 of 2019 on the file of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad against the Petitioner/Accused herein in the interest of iustice. I.A. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceeding in C.C.No.3813 of 2019 on the file of Xl Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad including the appearance of the Petition€r/Accused, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, Won perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Pratap, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Publac Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared'for the Respondent No.2. Criminal Petition No.9271 o12022 Between: Mr. Gujjar Sailesh Kumar, S/o Late G Nagender Rao, r Business. No 4-142, Old Bhoigiuda, Subash Road, Secunl Presently residing at C/o. Sripad Patalay, H.No.1-3-377, F OM Neelesh Enclave, Prudential Bank Colony, Kar Secunderabad. ANO

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosec Judicature for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. 2. Hanaumanth Rao Bangray, S/o Late Tulji Ram Bangra,r, Private Employee, R/o Plot No. 27, "Chaya", Road I Tirumalghiri, Secunderabad. ge: 50 years, Occ: rrabad. at No. 101,201,402, rjiguda, Tirmulghiri, Petitioner/Accused rtor, High Court of ...Respondent Age. 60 years, Occ. lo. 2, RTC Colony, "'ResP't ndenUCom plainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition he High Court may be pleased to quash the Complaint in C.C.No.3809 ol 20 I on the file of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secundera rad against the Petitioner/Accused herein in the interest of iustice. l.A. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition he High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C. No. 3809 c'2019 on the file of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunder€ cad including the appearance of the Petitioner/Accused, pending disposal of tl" t Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing t le Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumtrr ts of Mr. P. Pratap, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecuto' on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent Nc 2, Criminal Petition No.9272 o12022 Between: Mr. Gujjar Sailesh Kumar, S/o Late G Nagender Rao, I Business. No 4-142, Old Bhoigiuda, Subash Road, Secunri Presently residing at C/o. Sripad Patalay, H.No.'1-3-377, : OM Neelesh Enclave, Prudential Bank Colony, Kan Secunderabad. AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, l-li Judicature for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. ge: 50 years, Occ: rrabad. at No. 101,201,402, qiguda, Tirmulghiri, Petitioner/Accused th Court of ...Respondent

2. Vanita Eangray, W/o Hanaumanth Rao Bangray, Age: 55 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o Plot No. 27, "Chaya", Road No. 2, RTC Colony, Tirumalghiri, Secunderabad. ...RespondenUComfl ainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Complaint in C.C.No.381 1 of 2019 on the file of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magiskate, Secunderabad against the Petitioner/Accused herein in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceeding in C.C.No.3811 of 2019 on the file of Xl Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad including the appearance of the petitioner/accused, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Pratap, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondenl No.2. Criminal Petition No,9274 ot 2O22 Between: Mr. Gu]jar Sailesh Kumar, S/o Late G Nagender Rao, Age: 50 years, Occ: Business. No 4-142, Old Bhoigiuda, Subash Road, Secunderabad. Presently residing at C/o. $ipad Patalay, H.No.1-3-377, Flat No. 101,2O1,402, OM Neelesh Enclave, Prudential Bank Colony, Kanajiguda, Tirmulghiri, secunderabad ...petitioner/Accused AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. ...Respondent 2. Vanita Bangray, W/o Hanaurnanth Rao Bangray, Age: 55 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o Plot No. 27, Chaya", Road No. 2, RTC Colony, Tirumalghiri, secunderabad ...RespondenuGomprainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Complaint in C.C. No.3810 of 2019 on the fite of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad against the Petitioner/Accused herein in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that ir the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitior, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.3810 o. 1019 on the file of Xl Additional Chief Mekopolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad inctL ling the appearance of the Petitioner/Accused, pending disposal of the Criminal t, ,tition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing he Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argum: rts of Mr. p. pratap, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutc r on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent ll ,.2. Criminal Petition No.9279 o12022 Between: Mr. Gujiar Sailesh Kumar, S/o Late G Nagender Rao, Business. No 4-142, Old Bhoigiuda, Subash Road, Secunc Presently residing at C/o. Sripad Patalay, H.No.1-3-377, t OM Neelesh Enclave, Prudential Bank Colony, Kar Secunderabad. AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, ti Judicature for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. 2. Vanita Bangray, W/o Hanaumanth Rao Bangray, ,\ Housewife, Rio Plot No. 27, 'Chaya", Road No. 2, RTo Secunderabad. rge: 50 years, Occ: :rabad. lat No. 101,201,402, rjiguda, Tirmulghiri, Petitioner/Accused gh Court of ...Respondent te: 55 years, Occ: Colony, Tirumalghiri, ndenUCom plainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition :he High Court may be pleased to quash the Complaint in C.C.No.3812 of 20 9 on the file of Xt Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secundera:ad against the Petitioner/Accused herein in the interest of justice. "'Res5x l.A. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that r the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitaon he High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C. No. 3812 c,2019 on the file of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunder: oad including the appearance of the PetitioneriAccused, pending disposal of fl-r Criminal petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing t te Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argum€,r ts of Mr. p. pratap, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public prosecuto. on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent Nc 2. Criminal Petition No.9289 ot 2022 Between: Mr. Gujjar Sailesh Kumar, S/o Late G Nagender Rao, Age: 50 years, Ooc: Business. No 4-142, Oid Bhoigiuda, Subash Road, Secunderabad. Presently residing at C/o. Sripad Patalay, H.No.1-3-377, Flat No. 10'1,201,402, OM Neelesh Enclave, Prudential Bank Colony, Kanajiguda, Tirmulghiri, Secunderabad ...petitioner/Accused AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. .'.Respondent 2. Hanaumanth Rao Bangray, S/o Late Tulji Ram Bangray, Age.60 years, Occ. Private Employee, RJo Plot No. 27 , "Chaya" , Road No. 2, RTC Colony, Tirurnatghiri' secunderabad' ...Respondenucomprainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Complaint in C.C.No.3807 of 20'19 on the file of Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad against the Petitioner/Accused herein in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceeding in C.C.No.3807 of 2019 on the file of Xl Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magtstrate, Secunderabad including the appearance of the petitioner accused. pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P. Pratap' Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BI,E SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAI RAO CRI AL PETITION N os.9267 92

71.9272.9274.9219 nd 9289 oF 2022 COMMON ORDER.' When these matters are taken uP for consideration' Mr.P.Pratap, leamed counsel for the petitioners, ap 'earing through video conference, submitted that during the perr' Lency of these criminal petitions, the main cases, i.e., C.C.Nos'3ti 3, 3809, 3811, 3810, 3812, and 3807 of2019, were disposed ofon tl'12'2024' and the petitioners were acquitted- Copies of the said udgments have been placed before this Court.

2. By virtue of the same, this Court is of the cors dered view that the cause in these criminal petitions does not survive br adjudication.

3. Accordingly, the criminal petitions are closed As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions' pend I g if any, stand closed. /ffRUE COPY'/ ST) .P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASI ISTANT REGISTRAR (:.- SECTION OFFICER I I To,

1. The Xl Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate' Se; rnderabad Z. ine St"tion House Officer, Kharkhana Police Station' l- yderabad' 3. Two CCs to the Public pio.""'tor.' High Court for the State of Telangana at a Oire CC to Mr' P. Pratap, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD CoPies Hvderabad. [OUT'l Kam/PSLT HIGH COURT DATED:1711012025 ...-1 Il:C ',11 r COMMON ORDER CRLP.Nos .9267, 927 1, 927 2, 927 4, 9279 I nd 9289 of 2022 THE CRIMINAL PETITIONS ARE CLOSE D g "f

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments