The High Court · 2025

1. Barla Malla Reddy (Died) per LRs 2. Puppalagudem Srisailam

3. Puppalagudem Komuraiah (Died) 4. Batla Sanieeva Redclv S/o_Late Barla Malla Reddy, ary )d about 64 vrs.. Rl/o o5 Lahari coiony, eni.*,i'v,rr"fri, plij"i3r,", r Mandat, Sansareddy Bl8l|.x

5. Barla Raqhupathi Reddy, Sio. Late Barla Malla Reddy, i\ yed 61 yrs., Occ Service, R:io. BDt, B hanoor Vi,ise-, F;i#i.fi vanii r. ir"nr rJiiv Eliri"t (Respondent No.3 & 4 h.erein are brought on record as t I :s., of Respondent No l Barta Maila Reddy) fnt t" nS ""Y'"Li;r.rryt ..... Respondents/Res I ondents Petition under Section .j 51 .CpC praying that in the ()i cumstances stated in,the.affidavit fited in support of the peiitio;: in" i-ign Courl may be pteased ro 1ll9w.T_e.-Sgcond Appeat No 534 "t iooi in i;r;. of .orp,, mise Deed/petirion dated 28/02t2025 fited by appeilants t.A. NO: 10 F 2007(sA MP. NO: 1144 0F 2007) ,..pinJ"-nts herein "nO Petition under Section i 51- CpC praying that in the c r :umstances stated in the affidavit fited in support ot tne petition] in"'Higt Cor 1 may be pteased ir:'g ?n interim injunction restraining tre iespLnoents ar r their men from interfering with. the petitioners poJ."..io"--5io enjoyrr rnt of rhe rand admeasurinq Ac. 6.26 quntas S.No.2AS of Ahrnoor Ville 3e, patancheruvu Mandar, Medak District ,ini"n is suit scneo,ire pi"r""v in () i.no. 104/.1989 0n *:Jl"j:["rffurt of the Addt District Mrnrii-"r'il'ng, Redcl , pendins disposat IA NO: 10F 2018 tnpp"ar Petition under Section-'r51 .cpc praying that in the cir( umstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the peiitio;, ih" riign court r ray be preased to raise the fo'owing substantiar question;i i;; .as additior rr ground in the Memorandum of Grounds of the above i""ono u/ rether the Lower appellate court is not in error in hording ttiiE*. ar is invaric rnd iregar on the ground that previous permission ,noJ,. ,L..-+i of A.p(T il-r1r,""",, ."0 Agricurturar Lands Act was not obtained oetor"'prrcnase ot tht: rand under Ex.A1 without, there statemen fired by the 1st respondent/3'd defendant,.withor^,1!".1q ueinj any evidence r, I oo*, liu.pI.ti", ?!d y'Jh:rllhere being nay issue on it i.e. nJn obtr,n,ng per. ssion under Sec. 47 ot A P (T A ) Tenancv and Agricurtur"r rr"J. ntt before p r chasing the rand under Ex.A1 which resurted i" ;;;;i;g-p;;iroi#"r"o irrepir abte toss to the appellants herein. .being any preading in tne -wriitln- r.A. NO: 2 oF 2007 MP. NO:1145 oF 2007 Petition under section. 151. cpc praying that in the circL'.nstances stated in the affidavit fited in suooort of tne petiiionl ini'iirgn C_ou rt me1 be pteased stay the operation of the judsment,no aJ"-r""-iri"iiiiYi_roo, in t,.;No. 18 of 19e7 on the file of the II Additionar District and Sessions Judge [FTC] Medak at Sangareddy, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel forthe Appeilants : SRl. KTRAN REDDY MALLARAPU Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4: Md. HANEEF FARHAN Counsel for the Respondents: SRI V SAryAM REDDY SECOND APPE AL NO: 955 0F 2007: Between: Puppalagudem Satyanarayana (died), (died) by LRs. 1. Smt.Anthamma, W/o. puppaltgudem Satyanarayana, Aged -Fatancheruvu years, Occ. Household, Rl/o.Bihanoor Viliage, Medak District. about 40 Mandal, 2. Kuma.ri Shashikala, D/o.p.Satyanara.yana, aged about years. 17, Minor, 3. Kumari Sujana, D/o. late p.Satyanaraya na, aged about years. .14, Minor. Rl/o. Bhanoor Viilage, patancneiuvu fr4inOai, M""drk Districi.- 4. Venkatesh, S/o. late p Satyanarayana, gged about years, .12, Minor, Rl/o. Fl/o. Bhanoor Viilage, pata ncheiuvu nlllnOat, lrieJ, I Oi.tri6t. Bhanoor Viilage, patancheiuvu M;d;i, la-"or[-o]itri.t - (Appellants 2,3,4 are minors rep.by their mother smt.Anthamma the 1 st appellant herein) 5. Uppalagudem Shankaraiah, S/o Komaraiah, aged about 36 years, occ. Agrl. (All are Rt/o Bhanoor. Village, patancheru Mandal, Medak District.) (Appettants No.2 to 4 beinghinora. R;p. by iftir motheiirO-nairii guardian, Smt.Anthamma, 1dt appellant neirein I - AND APPELLANTS 1 2 3 4 q Barla Mallareddv. S/o Janoareddy, aged about 70 yrs., Agriculture R/o Bhanoor Vilage' patanchen utinilr,"nredr*t<" Di#& "' Puppalaoudem Srisailam. S/o papaiah Agriculture F/o Bhanoor Village Patancheru Mandal, Medak District. Puppalagudem Komaraiah. S/o Laxmaiah Agriculture Rl/o Bhanoor Village Patancheru Mandal, Medak District. Smt. Shankaramma, Wo Fakeeraiah House hold Rt/o Bhanoor Village Patancheru Mandat, Medak District.died feiLn{ nifi]o t a Vtde SJparate Sheet attached Puppala_gudem Manikyam, S/o. Fakeeriah, aged about 55 yrs, Rl/o. Bhanoor Village, Patancheru Mindit, Sangaredoy tji;tii;i *"""'

6. Puppalagudem Ramdas, S/o. Fakeeriah, aged about 52 rrs, Ft/o. Bhanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy District.

7. Chevella Rukkamma, W/o. Ramulu , aged about 60 yrs, )cc. Housewife, R/o. Mokila Village, Shankarpally Mandal, Rangareddy Distric . B. Kamsamma, W/o. Durgaiah, aged about 50 yrs, Occ. Hrr rsewife, R/o. Kanjerla Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Distric .

9. Yadamma, , Wo. Mallesham, aged about 40 yrs, Occ. I-1, ,usehold, R/o. Station Nagulapally Village, Ramachandrapuram, Sang:r eddy District. '10. Peddapuram Narsimlu, S/o. Kistaiah, aged about 60 yrs /o. Bhanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy District. 1'l . risailam, S/o. Kistaiah, aged about 58 yrs, Rl/o. Bhanoc r Village, patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy District.

12. Srinivas, S/o. Kistaiah, aged about 54 yrs, Rl/o. Bhanoor village, patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy District.

13. Komuraiah, S/o. Kistaiah, aged about 52 yrs, Rt/o. Bhanor r Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy District. RR 5 to 13 are rrought on record as LRs of the deceased Respondent No.4 vide Court Order I ated 2611212018 in lA No.4 of 2018 in SA No.955 of 2OO7. '14. Barla Raghupathi Reddy, Sio. Late Barla Malla Reddy, F1 ed tr/ajor, Occ Private Service, PUo. A-122, BDL Township, Bhanooivil i ge, paiancheru [Vlandal, Sangareddy District.

15.Barla Sanjeev_Reddy, S/o. Late Barla Malla Reddy, Agerl \4ajor, Occ private Service, Rl/o. Plot No. 45, Laheri colony, Bhanoor Village, ra[ancheru Mandal, Sangareddy District. RESPONDENTS lA NO: 5 OF 2018 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the cirr r mstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nay be pleased to permit the petitioners herein to serve the proposed LRs i.e., R :spondents 5 to 13 Respondents herein by way of substituted service by publishir I the said notice of L.R. Petition, condone delay petition for condoning the delay o 2896 days in filing the above L.R. Petition and also a petition to set aside the ir ,atement in Telugu Daily Newspapers i.e., Eenadu Or Sakshi which are I ring circulated in Patancheru area of Sanga Reddy District, pass lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ.r nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may )e pleased may be pleased to petitioners to raise the following substantial clr estion of law as additional ground in the Memorandum of Grounds of the aoo v r Second Appeal : Whether the Lower appellate court is not in error in holding tt- at Ex. Al is invalid and illegal on the ground that previous permission under Sec. 47 of A.p.(T.A.) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act was not obtained before purchase of the land under Ex.A1 without there being any pleading in the plaint filed by the 1st respondent/plaintiff, without there being any evidence by both the parties and without there being any issue on it i.e. non obtaining permission under sec. 47 of A.P (T.A.) Tenancy and Agricultural lands Act before purchasing the land under Ex.Al which resulted in causing prejudice and irreparable loss to the appellants herein and pass Counsel for the Appellants : KTRAN REDDy MALLARAPU Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : M/s R. VINOD REDDY The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMA]? JUKANTI I.A.No.4 of 2O2S In and SECOND APPEAL No.S34 of2OO7 SECOND APPEAL No.955 of 2OO1z -?.1 td COMMON JUDGMENT: Second Appeal No.534 of 2OO7 is filed I v appellants challenging the judgment and decree, dated 2t.O2.2OO7, in A.S.No.1B of 1997 on the file of II Additiona District and Sessions Judge (F"TC), Ivledak, at Salgareddy. wherein the judgment arrd decree passed by Additional Distri :t Munsrf, at Sangareddy, in O.S.No.104 of 1989, dated 27.12.1996, rvas dismissed.

2. Second Appeal No.955 of 2OOZ is filed b , appellzrnts challenging the judgment and decree, dated 2ii, O2.2OOZ. in A.S.No. 17 of 7997 on the file of II Additional )istrict and Sessions Judge (FTC), Medak, at Sangareddy, co rhrming the judgment and decree passed by Additional Distri< t Munsif, at Sangareddy, in O.S.No.171 of 1988, dated,27.12.l)96.

3. Heard learned counsel for appellants in l.A.Nos.534 and 955 of 2OO7 and learned counsel for resl ondents in S.A.Nos.534 ancl 955 of 2OO7 2 JAK. J sA 514 & 955 2007 4 As the issue involved in both the second appeals is one same, both the matters are heard together 5 For convenience, facts in S.A'No'53 4 of 2OO7 are being referred

6. Appellants herein are respondents in A S'No '18 of 1997 and plaintiffs in O.S.No.1O4 of 1989' Respondents herein are Iegal representatives of appellant in A S'No' I 8 of 1997 and defendant No.3 in O.S.No.104 of 1989'

7. O.S.No.1O4 of 1989 was filed by plaintiffs (appellants herein) before the Additional District lVlunsif' at Sangareddy' seeking specific performance of the contract against defendant No.3 (respondent No' 1 herein) Trial Court by judgment and decree dated2T '12'1996 allou'ed the suit'

8. Aggrieved by the judgment and decrce dated 27 '12'1996 in O.S.No.104 of 1989, respondent No' 1 herein filed A S'No' 18 of 1997 before the II Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Medak, at Sangareddy' First Appcllate Court' vide judgment and decree d,ated' 28 02'2O07' allowed A'S'No'18 of lggT by setting aside the judgment and decree dated 3 JAK, J iA 534 & 955 2007

27.12.1996 in O.S'No.1O4 of 1989' Aggrieved ry the same, -s/appellants the present second appeal is filed by piainr 1 herein g. I.A.No.4 of 2025 is filed seeking permissior to allor'"' the second appezrl in terms of compromise deed dat',- I 28 02'2025 entered into betr'rreen the parties'

10. On 17.O7 .2025, this Court directed the pzu t ies to appear before the High Court Legal Services C'r nmittee for identification of the parties, along with their :ounsels, in terms of the compromise deed dated 28'02'2( 25 annexed with I.A.No.4 of 2025. A report was submitted b ' High Court Legal Services Committee stating that hve plaint'i fs could not be identified. A Memo dated 20'11'2025 is filec on behalf of appellants, wherein a copy of the family memb: -s certificate and the famil-v tree along with aadhar cards are zr tnexed' 1 1. On 24.11.2025, learned counsel foI appellemts submitted that as changes in the names after rr rrriage were carried out, identification of the individuals (pz rties to the cases) was negated by High Court Legal Servict r Committee on the earlier occaslon 4 JAK. J sA 534 & 955 2007

12. It is submitted that I.A.No.S of 2025 is filed seeking amendment to the cause title and requested the Court to refer the matter to High Court Legal Services Committee for identification of parties, along with their aadhar cards' as their names were changed after marriage ' This Court' after perusing the contents of I-A.No'S of 2025 ald order dated 17.O7 .2025 passed in I.A.No.4 of 2025, requested the High Court Legal Services Committee to '''erifv the documents and identify the five individuais (parties to the cases)'

13. Administrative Ofhcer, Telangana State Legal Services Authority, submitted the report on 24'll'2025' the contents of the report are as follows: "[t is respectfulty submitted that Sn Kiran Reddy Mallarapu, Counsel for the Petitioners/ l^ppellants and Sn Md. Haneef Farhan, Counsel for ttre Respondents' have appearcd before me today I'e, on 24-17-2025' in ot.di".,." to the orders d,ated 24-11-2025 of the Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telargana, along with I heir re"p".trr. parties who are being identihed by them' in continuation of the carl.ier report dated 17 -O7 -2025- It is further submitted that I have gone through the Order dated 24-ll-2o25 of the Hon'ble High Court wherein, the Hon'ble High Court permitted to amend t1.e cause title and directed the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee to submit a report after identifying the parties along with their identity cards, of the five persons- It is respectfully submltted that previously ot 17 -O7 - 2025, t.rre Peltioner/ Appellant No'2 - Kumari Shashika-la' I 5 JAK. J sA 534 & 955 2007 Petitioner/Appellalt No.3 - Kumari Sujana, F Appellant No.9 - Chevalla Rukkamma, t Appellant No.1O - Kamsamma could not be ide their names were not tallied with their Aadhar ( accordingly this office has submitted the rep which petitions for amendment of Cause permission of the Hon'ble High Court were flled a the orders therein the Hon'ble High Court pe r amend the cause title in respect of tf Pctitioners/Appellant Nos. 2,3,9 & 10 as Pctitioner/Appellant No.4 - Venkatesha, thoug,l identified earlier. In the light of the said ord: Hon'ble High Court, the above Petitioners/Appc, 2,3,9 & 10 as well as Petitioner/ Appellant present and accordingly I have verihed the partic r their names i.e. Kumari Shashika.la (r) Pec Sumitra, Kumari Sujana (! Katne Sujatha, Rukkamma @ Kammeta Rukkamma and Karns Nagulapalli Shankaramma as well as Ven,( Puppalagudem Venkatesh, respectively a.l identihcation is established. Copies of their Aadlr which are endorsed by the counsel and the r enclosed herewith. The copy of the Identity Car counsel are also enclosed herewith." :titioner/ :titioner/ ltified as ards and lrt upon 'itle and 1d as per nitted to 3 above well as he was 's of the ant Nos. No.4 are lars with lapuram Chevella lmma @ rtesh @ I Lr Cards, ame a-re ls of the

14. In view of the affidavit hled, compromis t deed dated

28.02.2025 filed along with I.A.No.4 of 2025 ar d the report dated 24.11.2025 of the High Court Legal Servirrr s Committee for the State of Telangana, that identification of he parties is carried out, the statement made across the Bar by both the counsels that the matter is compromised, this O rurt is of the opinion that no furth er orders need to be pa ; ied in these matters. ..f-_riE! \ \ \ 6 JAK, J - sA 534 & 955 2007

15. For reasons aforesaid' I'A'No'4 of 2025 is ordered and S.A.No.534 of 2OO7 is closed in terms of the compromise entered. ln view of the orders tn S.A.No.534 ol 2OO7 S.A.No.955 of 2OO7 also stands closed. No order as to costs ' Miscellaneous applications pending' if any' shall stand closed Sd/- A.V.S. PRASAD DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To \

1. One CC to SRl. KIRAN REDDY MALLARAPU Advoiate IOPUCI i. o;; cc io vlt R. vlNoD REDDY ADVoCATE (oPUc) 3. One CC to Md. HANEEF FARHAAN ;. o;; cc io snr v. sAwAM REDDY, ADVoCATE (oPUC) 5. Two CD CoPies W I i l i I HIGH COURT DATED:25 t11t2025 r i t( Et\ 1 TAS 2 3 Ji\il ?{]21 -t * COMMON JUDGMENT l.A.No.4 OF 2O2S IN/AND SA.No.534 & 9SS OF 2OOl ORDERING I.A. & CLOSING THE APPEALS \ 1L IN THE COURT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF ]UDICATURE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD r.A. NO. OF 2025 IN S.A.NO. 534 0F 2007 Between: . Pu ppa lag ud emsatya na raya n a Died by LR's ,

1. Smt. Anthamma Wo. Pu ppalag udemSatya na rayana Aged about 4O yrs, Occ: Household, R/o. Bhanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist.

2. Kumari Shashikala D/o. P. Satynarayana, Aged about 28 yrs,

3. Kumari Sujana D/o. P. Satyanarayana/ aged 24 yrs..,

4. Venkatesh S/o. Late P. Satyanarayana, Aged about 22 yrs, R/o. Bhanoor village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy District.

5. Puppalagudem Shankaramma, S/o. Late. Fakeeraiah Died For LR,s

6. Puppalagudem Shankaraiya S/o. Late Komuraiah aged about : 57 yrs. Occ; Employee R/o. Bhanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist. 1 . e9 . ddu4 Yry:ffi 7 , s..,rev W 4 3 ,8. Died 9 o 1 a) ,lYlti"i;u.l 161 w6M rl. Res pond en t no. 4 14 lt. N.L 16I 77 )

5. Died @ ffi*:.4#^.*.* fgA ""'(2c--aj'--J- 'I 5 Co

7. Puppalagudem Manikyam S/o. Fakeeriah, Aged about about 55yrs, R/o. Bhanoor (V) Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist'

8. Puppalagudem Ramdas S/o.Fakeeriah, (Died for LR's )

9. Chevella Rukkamma W/o. Ramulu, Aged about about60yrs, Occ: Housewife R/o. Mokilf, Village, ShankarpallyMandal, RangareddY Dist.

11. Kamsamma W/o. Durgaiah, Aged about soyrs., Occ: Housewife, R/o. Kanjerla Village, Patancheru Mandal, SangareddY Dist. Yadamma W/o. Mallesham, Aged about 40 Yrs, Occ; Household, R/o. Station NagulaPallY Village, Ra mcha nd ra p u ra m, Sangareddy Dist' t2. Peddapuram Narsimlu S/o. Kistaiah, Aged about 5B yrs, R/o. Bhanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist. 1 ' , spb6t4 ,b.aa i{ 3 Jy 4 klV.Y:'-

5. Died a.,ffe"#gr B. Died 11 ,r,?,18i'a* ,rf$l, ,5t 4 Yr^a^',-...".- 17.\A EN!. 4 Respondent no L6&r.- 5 Afr;ffiffi (4,a.#1q...

10. T4 (.1, ,t-T)_ + I cosr"+^trtw- ;)-- ,,1 o Pa6e 3 of 21 13 t4 Srisailam S/o. Kistaiah, Aged about 54 yrs, R/o. Bhanoor'(V) Patacheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist. Srinivas S/o. Kistaiah, Aged about 54 yrs,R/o. Bhanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist.

15. Komuraiah S/o. Kistaiah. Aged about 52 yrs, R/o. Bhf,noor (V),Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist. (Appellant no.7 to 15 are Legal representetives of Appellant No. 5) 16 P Padma W/o. Late Ramdas aged about 48 yrs, Occ; Housewife, Bhanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist.

17. P. Vamshi S/o Late Ramdas Aged about 26 yrs, Occ: Agricultural R/o. Bhanoor Village,Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist. (The appellant no. 16 and 17 are brought on record as LR,s of Late Ramdas Appellant no.B) Petitioners/ Appellants 7'v'e,bt, ' 3. 433{ ra6o*, @/,- ') Jyfl 4 e__

5. Died B. Died 9

10. 72" ^) ?,M-p ,r..@ ,UB .JrP.,-l 13 rf\, 6 P:n_ CY Ar

74.', f: fl'ia po-t^< L 4-nnr',n- ,, ('!-+' E-5> / @ Respondent no. 4 L i Page 4 of 2l AND

1. Barla Mattareddy, died per LR,s 2. Puppalagudem Srisailam s/o. papaiah, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Bhanoor village, patanc-heru Mandal, Sangareddy District. J 4 5 Puppalagrudem Komuraiah S/o. Laxmaiah@ Lasmai; h, died (The respondent no. 2 ,ld not necessary party tc he compromise and no relief sought against them and n"rporaJnt NO. i and 3 as shown as formal parties to the compromise) .3.3r" Barla Sanjeeva Reddy, s/o. Late Barla Malla Reddy, Aged about 64 years, R/o. plot No.45, Lahari Colony, Bhanoor village, patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dil;r rict. Barla Raghupathi Reddy, S/o. Late Barla Malla Reddy, Aged about 61 yrs, Occ: Service, R/o. BDI Bhanur, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy District. (14th and 15th respondent, u." Legal Representatives rf deceased 1.t respondent, Late Barla Malla Reddy) (The Respondent no. 4 and 5 are brought on record e: LRs) .. Responde tts/Respsn6..1r. &tb,t r&#r351 ,W 44.,_ 3

5. Died f6's'a 6t %+/

04.* B. Died &Ttr 9 1- d o t4. A

10. B) t-ar,t" c.-. ds,*- 15 B ( D.Fl8sd)all

11. (*x-l 16@- Yd..!eJ..t'.( 77 h rs@- Respondent no. 4 arr i 5 f E OM ION FILED !r/oRDER-XXIII RU LE-3 OF CPC I R/ W SECTION 15 10FC PC BETWEEN THE PETITION ERS/A PELLA NTS I RESPECT OF SUIT SC HEDULE PROPERTY i.E, LAND B EARING SY.N o 289. EXT. A . 6.09 GTS., SITUATED AT BHANO OR (V), PATANCHERU ( M), SANGAREDDY DIST . T.S.

1. The Petitioners / Appellant No. 1 Late puppalagudem Satyanarayana and appellant no.6 puppalagudem Shankaraiah have filed suit for specific performance of the Agreement or sare dated 23.04. 7967 an Ext. Ac.6.26 gts., as against Barla Malla Reddy (1't Respondent herein), puppalagudem papaiah (father of 2nd Respondent herein), puppalagudem Komuraiah (3.d respondent herein) seeking rerief for specific and performance of contract of sale respect dated 23.04.1967 as against the BarlaMalla Reddy (1.r Respondent herein), Defendant No.3 in the suit O.S. No. 104 of 1989) with regard to land bearing Sy. No.2B9 to the extenf of 6.26 gts., situated at Bhanoor (v), patancheru (M), Sangareddy Dist., T.S.

1. s"d&d 2 Xr.ie(-/ , J?k ?{:C-ooa 5' Q47i;,ffi B. Died 9 1 1

11. ftiz- 16 ^3./ ,,u_P* lL'tl 74 u wE&Respondent no. 4

17. 13 +..;,&1,o

1..- a

5. Died t^K'lKaF,'t'44- # $)/ffi";"s- t) 10. PTJ lZo-r'rSo.v'',"-v- 5 PaEe 6 of ZL *

2. Barla Malla Reddy S,/o. Janga Reddy i.e 1,t r:spondent herein has filed suit OS..NO 77t OF 19BB for perpetual rnjunction as against Pullalagudem papaiah and Srishailam and pul :lagudem Komraiah , Satayanarayana and shankaraiah vide OS.tO.171 of 19Bg both suits were tried together and thereby the triar ."rn o;..;";;" ;; OS.NO. lO4 OF 1989 directed B. Malla Reddy o execute sale deed in favour of the plaintiffs in respect of land bet ring sy.no 2g9 to an ext. of 6.26 gts., situated at Bhanoor village. .r re suit filed by Barla Mallareddy in OS.NO t7l OF 19BB for perpetu. I injunction the said suit was dismissed.

3. The Respondent no.1 namely B. Malla RedtJ , preferred appeal before the Hon,ble Dist. Court Medak at Sanc; reddy the same is transferred to II addl. Dist.Judge Medak at Sangareddy. Vide AS.NO 17 0F 7997. A: o s No 171 of 1eBB, ;:il:L,TJj;T"J,;l]'H::j"lT"jl: prefered appeal as against the judgment and lecrees passed in O.S no. 7O4 of 1989vide AS. NO 18 OF 1997 onthe fite ;r;r;r, Dist. Judge at Sangareddy.

7. es " Q.l d-r 4 , $,43i* 3 oy- \-z

5. Died ,i:.1*d B. Died ( +rffi)!,u; 8i"J"2, a)o 14. @ E&, Respondent no. 4 arr I 5 ,tmp (.e,L 10 '.. \ \r*)-- o PaEe 7 of Zl

4. While the appeals are pending puppalagudem Satyanarayana S/o Fakeeraian died, his LRs were brought on record as Respondents as Appellant No. 1 to 5 as his legal heirs.

5. The appeal AS.NO. 17 OF LggT arising out of the judgment and decree passed in OS.NO. 171 of 19BB and AS.NO. 18 OF 1997 as against the judgment and decrees 104 of 1989 was keenly contdsted by the both parties. After hearing both side the II Addr. Dist Judge arrowed the appear AS.No 17 oF tggT and arso AS 18 OF 7997 by passing common judgment dt:2a/2/2OO7.

6. The appellants herein preferred second appeal as against judgment and decree passed in AS. 17 OF lggT the second appeal is numbered as A.S.NO 9S5 OF 2OO7 the hon.ble high court granted stay suspending the judgment and decree passed in AS 17 & 1B by the II Addl. Dist. Judge at sangareddy, the appellant also preferred another appeal AS .NO. 534 of 2007 as againstjudgment and decree passed in AS 18 OF lgg7. 7' eg" ej61/ 2' s.4s!{ ) J'/a 4

5. Died ?,XY-aoo 6. Qt db,'l'- I

11. 2 - -) -.,t n,\ r56JJ;?€6 B. Died "ffi -1 a) o 74 f,etL \ T l"J|t^4a"S"rhr.14- 1s. ( 0:-tL

16. w ta. I g(4L Respondent no. 4and5 0 page 8 of 2l rrJl"

7. While the matter stood appellant No. 5 namr ly puppalagudem .. Shankaramma Wo Late Fakeeraiah, Oiea tr,, ving behind herself 3 Sons namely 1. Lat Fa kee ra ia h, r r,, 0", *,oo "ojT"T[],.:) l, lli" " :fl ::: Late Puppalagudem Ramdas, S/o Late t. t ee.aiur,. The 1,tson Satyanarayana who is pupparasudem mun*# :;j" ;:'::_::"_; ;"*":J# I: nanrely p Ramdas ar j,ll'ilil:'::J,,,,Jo,i""J,r;,: j:,: su bseq u e n tr y o, rr",u nio himself his wife p. padr *'o Late Ramdas' Aged about 48 yrs .occ: Housewife R,zo. ,r"u (v) patancheru 4, Sangareddy Dist. and also name p. Uu..nlunoo. S/o' Late Ramdas Aqt:r I about 26 yrs, occ: Agricurtural azo. enurool - (v) Patancheru M, Sarr lareddy Dist. B. The Respondent No. 1 namely Barla Malla Rer :rar: :*:: Redc v arso died reavins behind himserr nis twl ;" sons namely B' sanjeer a Reddy s/o. Late Malla Reddy, aged ab son name y u *",n,o""i,l XiJi,I;"lll,fi"i]iiJ];,ll;:":[: There are no other legal represe nta tives. Accordir rgly two sons who t .k.-=_

5. Died J 4 ,. ,. il614 , &lss{ w**, @tbt*- B. Died

11. l-\!,_ "t 7 I ,;ISBS,.l'} ?*tl 8@ Respondent no. 4

77. @, a- J 5 ;-,ffi| U orrftg,,l )q.ft^r".-t"1\L 10 t15 are the LRs of Respondent No. 1 is brought Respondents No. 4&5. The. R.espondent No.2 Puppalagudem Komuraiah and Papaiah were no made formal parties to the suit and no relief is them as such he their LRs are not necessary com prom ise. on record as & 3 namely more they a re sought against pa rties to the

9. It is submitted that, while the matter stood thus, as per the advice of elder and well wishers both parties have sat together and came to an amicable settlement to settle the dispute and also to put end to the long litigation since 1987 onwards. Accordingly, as per the advice of the elders and well wishers both parties in respect of schedule of property available on the spot land bearing sy.no 289, Ext. Ac. 6.099ts., Situated at Bhanoor (V), Patancheru (M), Sangareddy Dist.

10. Barla Malla Reddy i.e first respondent herein as executed regd. sale deed in favour of Puppalagudem Papaiah and his children to an ext. of Ac.3.12 gts., t. eg. al$,l o 3 , $J"xt' Jt 7 g+-

8. Died .J ./ trN*1) vJ 1

11. A.iLffi ,u.w ?'$ I d s@t 4

5. Died -?.W,: ",ot.g+ 1s Respondent no 4 5 @ page tO of 2l of his share as thr tu'' Papaiah was alsr holder and ,n" f puppa asudem,;,"J::: ;,Tg;*;,;i,l ::,fi""T:il* Laxmaiah one of the share holder who purchasc n ,u1".!l'"o"oetr hased the property to the said rrrarra neoJ exr. of Ac.3.12 gts., " ,;; oau,-" execute and his nominees uly favourof laxmaiah j,per his desire to urt, 'n his srlbre in respect t"' "; ";t .",* j,j with derin ite 0",,r".]lj'' rllji"i rlli"T;*

71. It is submitted thar as respondent no.1 rl not executed *"r0. ,,'' }i"[:ilTil::' "". ;;;:ff*T*f fl :l Fakeera ah gts., of land in sy.no zsq ." ^.:.'::"'tnt'e Total Ext. Ac. 6.26 289' as such they fik: performance of contra I a suit for specific of sale ou'ing on t le contract of sale dated 23-04-Inur, ,r,.'f sale considera,,", *",, position already delive ";. il#::t:::' ff 23 / 4 / 7s 6 T,rhere is r"rl,i^1 sale deed i, ruror.';;..i'", found r he rand u.rr ro.'1",i'.n"*. "lrn;":f::H,:;ffi:: 0n rhe 0",; left over except thrr -";' ''rort$'4,hA#"t fiSa"4 ,,y\*. ) J'/'t 4H.,o - 5. Died B. Died

11. (TI 16. , P,56. "rr6 q. J .) o?,€,8;, ":m i, (:9. EHL Respondent no. 4 ar( +. ,(k-r.l-1.-r4_ m,, v i'5 b! ^-P1 Pa6e 11 of 21 But not an ext. of land Ac.6.26 gts., available on the spot. As per 'the advice elder and weil-wishers the both parties have settred the dispute in respect of land available on the spot i.e Ac.6.09 gts. only in Sy.No.289 situated at Bhanor village patancheru mandal. 1'2' It is humbry, submitted that, as per the advice of the werl wishers and elders the petitioners / Appellants herein have agreed andtccepted to restrict their claim in respect of land bearing Sy. No. 289, to the extent of Ac. 4.27 gts.., only and they are not claiming remaining Act 1 .28 gts. . . of the land as per the advice of the elders the said Ac 1.28 gts., of land shall be enjoyed as owners and possessors of LRs of BarlaMalla Reddynamely B.Sanjeeva Reddy and B. Raghupathi Reddy.

13. It is submitted that, the Respondents / Defendants No.4&5 LRs of Barla Malla Reddy have accepted to execute Regd. Sale Deed in favour of the appellants and their nominees as per their share and possession as shown in the sketch map to the Ext. Of Ac. 4.21 gts., In Sy. No.2B9, Situated at Bhanoor (V), patancheru(M), Sangareddy Dist., T.S. 1 ^o'' o.) I o e/A.r-,f ?8";/ry, 6,,,p_ AAgu{, s';a 4:z- 4

5. Died

8. Died 9 p_r ,,. .1, ltTa 16@ rt63n,fft7, c.lt ,r.w o 14. Reslohdent no. 4

10. K{<-ryrnrgr- Atfl- 1a".q"-.a-3".rv.1r..o rs6*=-oD=- I 5 PaEe 12 of 22

14. It is submitted that after purchase (,1 the property the ..documents dt: 23/4/ 1967 there wasan oral partition took place between four brothers each brothers got Ac..13 gts. each i.e p Papaiah, Laxmaiah, Fakiraiah, Komaraiah Ur I said oral division specifically shown in plan annexure to this conr rromise deed. 15. As per the shares of the appellants . re concerned the Resp.ondent / Respondents No.4&5i.e LRs ot Barla Malla Reddy shall execute sale deed as per the desire cl the appellants as follows:

1. An of extent P Satyana rayana 1to Specifically shown in plan attached to the conr ,romise of Ac.0.Z1gts., towards to his LRs i.e Appellant rr r share of 4 herein. petition.

2. An of extent oF Ac.2lgts.., of land shall be, registered in the name of the Manikyam i.e LRs of Appellant No.7. Specifically shown in plan attached to the compromise petit ion.

3. An ext.of Ac O.21gts., in Sy.No. 289 is to be rer ister in the name Legal representative of Ramdas i.e padma and /amshi Appellant No.16&17. Specifically shown in plan irr tached to the compromise petition.

1. a"pJb, , &dXg{ F,*'d*i!W*- 3 5,/U 4 )ELi---

5. Died

11. &.'t 16 ?. B. Died ffih:" ;*y6 O Fg"P 15. €@A Respondent no. .A I Ao

9. lLr o 1 4 Po 17 <O,Y-olqm*-t t 5 i

4. An ext. of Ac.2.38 gts., land is belonging to appellant no.6 Puppalagudem Shanakariah including his family members who are not parties to the suit and the said property to be register in the name of P. Shanakariah or his nominee to an ext. of Ac. 2.38 gts. in Sy.No. 289 situated Bhanoor village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist. Specifically shown in plan attached to the cogrpromise petition.

5. It is submitted that the remairiing ext. of land 1.28 gts., is retained by LR's of Barla Malla Reddy i.e Respondent No. 4 and 5 they are concern only Ac. 1.28 gts. of land Specifically shown in plan attached to the compromise petition.

6. The appellants are restricting / confirmation their rights to an ext. of Ac. 4.27 gts., in Sy.no 289. the Respondent No.4 and 5 shall execute regd. sale deed immediately after compromise decree passed by this Hon'ble Court. The appellant shall not claim an ext. Ac.1.28 gts. of land belonging to Respondent no. 4 and 5 as per the said settlement.

16. It is submitted that, the Petitioners / Appellants and Respondent / Respondents No. 4&5 have amicably settled the matter out of the court. It is also specifically admitted by the respondent no.4 and 5.If any documents, are created by B. Mallareddy i.e respondent "w 11 L"r+ ,UB , i) Adi{= ryu w ,@ru*- \ )." BAO' a) B. Died L2 13 4 o ";;* d1 o 4 ?,r ,r.6 @b Ede Respondent no. 4 5

5. Died

10. (

15. ip)-- ,v- I ( Page L4 of 2t no.3 herein, subsequent to agreement sale c:: 23/4/7967 all the -. documents invalid it will not affect the right cf the appellants to an ext. oF Ac.4.2l gts., oF land belong to appelrr nts. The documents are created subsequently document dt: 23/4t1967 i.e R4 and R5 are deemed to be cancel they have no legal :; rnctity in the eye of law so called, the Gift deeds documents execL ted by Late B.Malla Reddy during the pendency of the suit/appe ,l infavour of Barla Jaydkrishna Reddy vide Doct. No, 29729 of 2116 and regd. Gift Settlement Deed document executed in favou. of Barla Srikanth Reddy vide Doct. No.29728 ot 2076, and also r tgistered Gift deed document No. 297 27 of 2076 executed in favt rr of B. Sadashiva Reddy are invalid under law. The said docrr nents are created during pendency of suit though resistant or,1 :r passed by the Hon'ble High court, Barla Mallareddy created dtrr,vs 5.16 document which are invalid not binding upon the appel,ani . The Respondent no. 4and 5 are alone responsible to answer the r laim setup by the above said persons. As the said document ;t3 created during substance of agreement of sale dt: 23/4/1967 ar C also possession with purchaser. in view of admitted agreement o sale deed of Dt: 23-4-7967 and possession with purchaser. t. eo.eter{ , h,63A"[ 3 J,yu -EDied Ora-!- 3,2'-+5 o6, 7l. ?i as ,3t a) A t"ffi:

16.9L a \77 13 4 fulr--s. oiua g ffih. d?o{9'L $.(L-4 'l r_ U.rr4 t<o..n{4r.-rt l /F@z Respondent no. 4 arJ 5 l Pa6e 15 of 21 If any claim setup by alleged purchaser in respect of land in Sy.No.289 it will not atfect the rights of the appellants in respect of 4.27 gts in Sy.No.2B9 Situated at Bhanoor Village, patancheru Mandal, Sangareddy Dist. The socalled document created by B. Malalreddy father of the respondent 4 and 5. The Respondent no. 4 and 5here are alone responsible claims any third party it will not affect rights of appellant in respect Sy.No.2B9 4.21 gts. If any claims within the family members of. the appellants they have to sort of their dispute in respect of Sy.No.2B9 to an ext. of Ac 4.21 gts., the same will not affect the right of the respondent no..4 and 5 to an ext. of Ac. 1.28 gts.an Sy.No.289 situated at Bhanoor Village, Is specificaliy show in the sketch map annexed to this compromise, As the purchasers and the doc.no 23_4_1967 are in possession and enjoyment of the above said property. After death of Fakiraiah the appellant no.1 and thereafter LR,s of in possession and appellant no.6 is also in possession in respect of Sy.No.2B9 which is specifically shown in the map annexed to the compromise. , s.r,3 ({= sy ffi"* B. Died 3 st$Q) 1fr8

2. 1 eg . U$4 ":t6: r,( r,r,r4 tu.E>_ 13 B@ Respondbnt no. 4 4 9, z-

5. Died

10. z-Y.+tlr^.g- Ls,<-x.- .5 I I paBe 1G ot 21

17. It is submitted that, as per the advice of the elders. the Respondents No.4&S have accepted to setUe t 1e dispute with the Petitioners/Appella nts srs.. or and as ,". ;: ':"Jffi:"j";: ;r"iffi;n;j :: Bhanoor (V), patancheru(M), Sangareddy Dist LS. the appellants shall not claim any right in respect of 1-.28 gts., )f land retained by the respondent no. 4 and 5 and exclusiv: y belong to the respotrdent No.4 and 5 as per the compromise. 18. It is submitted that, the Respondents No, Sanjeeva Reddy and B. Raghupathi Reddy L Reddy, do hereby admit that the appeilant t absolute owners and possessors of land to the E> Sy.No. 289, Situated at Bhanoor (V), patanchert Dist. And if any third_party claims have no legal : of law in respect of the No. 2Be, Ext. Ac. . rr'J::TIr:::T::'J:j::, (M); Sangareddy Dist. And the Respondents absolute owners of the remaining land to the Ext. , &5namelyB. F s of Bada Malla r e alone are the L Ac. 4.21gts.., in ' (M), Sangareddy ;, nctity in the eye ; opellants i.e. Sy. (V), Patancheru I o. 4&5are the :'Ac. 1.28 gts.in Sy.No.2B9. 7'*.!$t , tt,.4ag{ Yfr'frryd/^r) 3 ),ft B. Died

5. Died t 4& ) I 9 k-t5J f563*YrtrE,:, {%xt- 15 77 s@- Respondent'no. 4 5 l(olrzro-Se.rtrn-vr-- q ,i:w ,u.@-- L- PaBe 17 of 2L

19. It is Further submitted that during the pendency of the above said cases, the Respondent No. 4 namelyr parla Sanjeeva Reddy executed a relinquishment deed on 15-08-2023 in favour of Respondent No. 5 i.e. Barla Raghupathi Reddy who is none other than his own brother. Accordingly, the Respondent No.4 relinquished his right of y2 share out of 1.28 gts., oF land whatever infavpur Respondent No.5 in respect of the above-mentioned lands. As such Respondent No.4 or his l6gal heirs, have no any sort of right, Interest, claim or future claim in respect of his right of share as he already relinquished his right of share in respect his half share in above said Ac.1.289ts in Sy.No.2B9.

20. As per the understanding between the Lrt of BarlaMallareddy namely Barla Sanjivreddy, and Barla Ragupathireddy, Barla Sanjivreddy has accepted not to claim any part oF Sy.No.2B9 except to an ext. of Ac.1.2B gts., fell, to their share. However they Respondents no.4 and 5 shall execute regd. sale deed in pursuance of the dt: 23/4/L967 in favour of Appellant has mentioned para 15 oF compromise and the Appellant herein shall not have any objectionAc.l.2B gts of land in Sy.No.2B9 it is exclusives belonging to LR's Barla Mallareddy. , "3,5a 3{' S,rSu 4

5. Died

1. u "elt{ ?,4" €6&) 6 Wwry ,, ffi,,rfJ!!e t-rf Yoel t".".^4-- t6.@,-' n U) {-5 B. Died 9 t:

10. w Atz n-u 13 o L4 P6y PL] E@ Respondent no. 4 '.r LAaJ t.L- 15 5 Aft'U' c Po.aA A

1. It is submitted that, the appellants also prefer appeal as against the judgment and,decree pass in AS No 17 OF 1997 the said ,,t2 aooeal second is numbered as'W.955 OF .l )07 on the file this \'//,n' ' py Hon'ble court the said appdal arising out of t re OS.NO. 171 OF 1988. That Is suit for perceptual Injunction f led by Barla Malla Reddy. It is submitted that the LR's of Barla ltl rlla Reddy i.e Barla Sanliv Reddy and Barla Ragupathi Reddy are r dmitting that their father namely Barla Malla reddy has delive -, rd vacant physical possession in respect of Sy. No.289 to an ex[ , of Ac.13.12 gts., in favour of the purchaser. In pursuance of th: agreement of sale dt: 23/4/$67, Since the date of purchase he purchaser are exclusive ooil&TAord.rHt,o8n]ovrn"nt of progr, ,rtv with absolute rights. Hencd appeal"E 955 OF 2OO7 may >e allowed to the Extent of Ac. 4.27 gts., as shown in the sket,: r plan attached to the compromise petition.

22. It is submitted that the respondent no 4 an I 5 namely Barla Sanjiv Reddy and Barla Ragupahti reddy r,r I o are the legal representative late Barla Malla Reddy are the her:by admitted that the land to an ext. of Ac.4.27 gts., in Sy. No.28) situated Bhanoor village, is in exclusive position and enjoyment of lhe appellants. 1'<s "n|il,l , $.5a9{ ) s?h 4 \:

5. Died U Y ,,ffi.r, .6 Va- ar-L+- uw- 1 ?Jy 1

8. Died 9 C 1 '&,\ W l\t4ar1t?t\ a) o (,;i*"

15. rs83"1'o) 1 l<-o-r.t4*.* \y- ;)-- ,, @, lqfts- Respondent no. 4 5 2)) Page 19 of 2l I shown in the sketch plan annexed to the compromise, In view of the admission and acceptance of the position of the appellants by Barla Sanjiv Reddy and Barla Raghupathi reddy and respondent No.4 and 5 the appellant's preferred second appeal AS NO. 955/2007 may be allowed by setting aside the judgment passing AS NO. 77 OF 1997. The said second appeal arising out of OS.171 OF 19BB i.e suit for perpetual injunction inview of the admission respond no.4 and 5 the appellants 6re in possession inrespect of Ac.4.2l gts. Sy.No. 289 situated at Bhanoor Village, Patancheru mandal, Sangareddy Dist. second 534 of 2OO7 may be allowed by setting aside the judgment in AS 18 OF 7997 to the ext. of Ac.4.21 gts., in Sy. No.289 which is specially shown plan annex to the compromise petition. Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to allow second appeal in terms of the compromise partly Ext. Ac.4.2lgts... only and rest of land Ext. Ac. 1.28 gts... in favour of the Respondent No.4 and 5i. eBarlaSanjivreddy and Barla Raghupathi Reddy, LR's of Late Barla Malla Reddy. Accordingly, the Respondent no.4 and 5 namely Barla Sanjivreddy and Barla Raghupathireddy directed to execute the sale deed iori the name of the appellants either in their name of Ir 1. *.rlil 2 "3, #+Sf, J'rk 4

5. Died fi'H*,,do,rL 2 1_) ?s6A .5e,a 1 B. Died 9 ki:L **

10.. e) oro.l:g"y 15 1 <_-/

77. @ EHq Respondent no. 4 5 11 (t-L"l rc@- y^J+"*r. n$ .Ji Ya.WZ.*-r".tl PaEe 20 of 27 nominees to an ext. of 4 )1 dt- i^ -.. ^, (v). patancheru (M), ,_i"1l.iX;,'].,t:l;,,rrt situared ar Bhanoor a,owed withour costs and the Responde", *:t. JT::r.::I:J:; execute Regd. Sale Deed in the name of the t"-" apprr lants either in rheir name or rheir nominee.;;_:; -:"=_.:] es name to an Ext. of Ac. 1 21 gts.., in Sy. No. 289 as follows:_ a P. Satyanarayana died for LR,s An ext. of O.Zt gts., in Sy.No.289 to fhe appelt: nt no.1 to 4 LR,s of P.satyanrayana.

1. Smt. Anthamma W/r 0",, 4 0 y r s, 17^"0. K/o. Bhanoor Village, patancheru sangareddy Dist. 2. Kumari Shashikala D, oguo u;rii;;;'" ";.:,i#I"Hio:d". tlanOat, u/o' P' Satvnaravana, satva na ra y,,a

3. Kumarisujana D/o. p. Satyna Narayana, aged 24 yrs., 4. Venkatesha S/o. Late p. Satyna Narayana, Aged about 22 y rs, 1' o-ot$.r , b.443{ w3 !i'7afl,**_ B. Died

17. Art-4

16.& I2-ar_4 (;Bi^*u)

72.' 13?EP 77 b Respondent no. 4 tsr& 74 4 \.). -

5. Died :ffiI rea) !, r 1tr-r- _# ,rJL"i-- n rL* E-ahAAyhrurr._ ,iA; PaEe 27 of Zt Ac.0.2lgts., of land in Sy.No.2B9 is to be registered in the name of p. Man'ikyami.e Appeilant no. 7 herein and 0.21 gts, of rand in the name in the name of Ramdas i.e appe[ant no. 16 and 17to an ext. of Ac. 2.38 gts, is to be registered in the name of Appelant no. 6 and his share holders as per the desire of the appellant no. 6, appellant no. 6 namely Pu[aragudemshankaraiah. AIr are resident situated at Bhanoor (V), Patancheru (M), Sangareddy Dist., as per the plan enclosed to the compromise in the interest of justice and.equity. 5dg { , s,v 1--.rg oQl6r, , rN'fieiot, "), 'Jz t @a4)- B. Died 4 9

11. hr-l 0 75 93L "( o 74. %w& lry- ,rF,56fr"S)

17. @ Petitioners / Appellants.

5. Died 1 ,.-'e.- !I gt 6,,45 k^"n,r.4"^ q.

15. Date: Lq -02-2A25 Place: Hyderabad T rou g Counsel. ls@_ Respondent-4 & Respondent-5. Through Counsel t '<J (IJ OH q)bo((J ;-. o_{ (g .:a {J t-{ E(d 15 C\JOM 'r55 OJ qJ <l) rr< cr) Cf) -{J c(J EEl PIan Annexure of Com romir e Deed "South" Land of Hari B Puppalagrr dem Antharnlna ^Y/. Sat5zanarayana & Lr's a to 4 Ac.O_Zt-Gts Puppalagrrdern N{arlikyarr r S/o Fakeeraia-tr . Appealertt l\fo.7 Ac-O_21-Gts t-pp+."rdern padrna W/ o It arndas - * V:ryhi Appealent No.1Z s. r, L,r's of Appealent No-g, Ac.O- j 11-Gts Puppalagrrdern SFrankaraiaI- S/o I(ornurai aI. & Ottrers Legal Heirs, Appealent No.6 Ac.2_It l-Gts B- :1- IRagFrupaflri Iiedd1. Etarla. Sani =zz;,J_7^";=Lt-=1?., IRes.pond errt }.fc, - 3-;? Ac-1_2g-Gts .<_. |'t 'F< 6 TJ o m >-' L{o CJ CU fE{ FJam ct) qJ = ILerrr

1. ,, "o-i b4 aining lancl in Sunze5z Ni ,:r."43i'd 3 W "ZL <>-2gg ,

5. Died 6

11. lLT 16 7 @a)t- B. Died ,r?$S^A Yntf

77. 9 ITt-4 c1,r{Tffi- '"r, (,y 1s.tr (ae4 10 Counsel for Respondent no. e titi nerlAp pe lla n ts ffit4z M$v.. Y s-r 4 5 Peti:.i >ners pe lla nts r { .tI l.; (r h; I