The High Court · 2025

9. Boini Srinivis, S/o Boini Hanumappa, Age 37 yrs, Caste Mudiraj, Occ Agrl, R/o H. No. 1- 27 Marepally (V) PeddemulMandal, Vikarabad District 10,89inj $riniym, $;/s Boinj Ramapps, Age 31 yrs, Cagte Mudir4' Occ Agflr Rlo H. No. 1- 96 Marepally (V) Peddemul Mandal, Vikarabad District

11.Gali Chiranjivi, S/o Janardhan, Age 26 yrs, Caste tt4lr19iraj, Ogg.Ag.tl, R/o H. No. 1- 34{1 ThormamidiVillage, Bantwaram Mandal, Vikarabad District ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to { 1 AND

1. The Sfiate of Telangana, Rep by the Public FrosecutorHigh Couit at Hyderabad ...Respondent : I I I ' Fe',i#.Lrfi hYt,5sT,:Hl_1e,; District. -11#J:i FH5"H,1 t#,il?, k3,:e#,, ... RespondenUDefacto Complainant Petition under section 528 of, BNig.praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds or criminai'p"tition, tn" H,gh court may be pleased to quash the proceedtng-s in sc. r-ro zoo of 2012 on irre file of the court of sc sr court, L.B. Nagar,hlnsr. n"o'jv-*nich has been taken on fire against the Petitioner/Accused Eerein toi t'" oEnces under sections 323, 324, 506, r/w 34 rpc, and section 3(1)(r) (s) of scrl.J'6r, pon ACT 2015. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 petition under section s2g BNss.praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds sr cr"imn'ai F.titiuo, fl-" H,d; court may be pleased to stayr the p'oceedings in sc. rrro. ioo of 2017 on t-he fire of the court of sc ST Court, L.B. Naqai nrr!" n"roy-,-incruding the appearance of the Petitioner in Court. 9f, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between fi{iiul.:HXft t},yt,$:fr :,l?'"#ffi ,?;JJ:,83:5#,Ttil1ilgy*3;?#n, District. ...RespondenUDefacto Complainant AND 1Biil$?:'R?ePfl i:qr"unl'"r?r"l,fr"ff 'a;f;"",r,iilrh.?1.?,[Y.ioii! 2 3

4. Pgini Narsimulu, S/o Boini Ram fi:ffitli.,5E:ft,?l;;3,"'fl4i'Jissn,tfl,:lj"y,'v,,1"?:f?yb?3ii,,;,occ Asri, R/o E:'ilt le"#ffll a}i,,i fifi ' r'S?T.fi;,1fl :,# il f i *AT: Jtsg nroHiG:'T:eo'n,r-'ii"i'iU'df Fffffi;nnfi j.l jil'v,*t#lt".y$fl lfi t,occAsri, R/';il'ri;.;-'i5 r\,i*,i,;rii l'u*?S1Bffi,f,Xfl:,ilt"ri,.:,X'J:Jts:iraj, occ Asri, 3:?3}xf,,'J*Yllr'flEF3lf3#lffi:,f.'"i?s;t""yts?iffiko".onn,Rbii

5. Qgini Venkatappa, S/o Boini Laxr 6fi rqj, o cc As r,, R/o

7. pgini.Narsimulu, S/o Boini Laxm Rio H iGl i _ 2 6, r\,ri,i#;ir y &j H?tB?,, nrf, l l,1'x, f,?:f", y5fl-{;ll o cc As rr, .l 8ffi :,,{-[fl ff1*Bi1,,P^X'fl"?if"1;$'ffi j,lJ:v,i.#:B,y3?1,,?koccAgr,,R/oH 'ffiJiltfi'::',1'rrtffi ,P""*lli,Xftfi'il"?if"ilnriff lJ,,?,9?:L?yBfl liloccAsrr, 'oE:'ilf :{'15'3ii,?l?5i,j?.,ffi :ltrS,f,,i^l:,lJ,t:.i3Hl:y8[T,,?LoccAst'r,R/o ttcaticUffi ;iJ?,*?jlilff ,:?t,Affi n?g,l',i'r",x'ji,,\,lfj,?#r.8,*?,tiR/oH ... Petitioner/Accused AND 1 The state of relangana, Rep by the public prosecutor High court at Hyderabad Petition under Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circurnstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminai petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to file the present quash petitionlo compound the non- compoundable offences under sections 323, 324,506, r/w 34 lpC, and Section 3(1X0 (s) of SCs and STs POA ACT 2015 in SC. No 206 ot 2017 on the file of the Court of SC ST Court, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy. ..Respondent l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminai Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the proceedin-g oy way oi compounding the offences against the Petitioner in SC. No 206 of-2017 on-the file of the Court of SC ST Court, L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon .hearing the arguments of Sri Malla Reddy Sankati, Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TTRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and GOMMON ORDER: 1. This criminal Petition is fited seeking the court to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 11 in s.c.No.206 of 2017, on the file of the special court for scs & srs (PoA) Act at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, registered for the offences punishable under sections 323, 324 and 506 rtw 34 of l.P.C. and Section 3(1XrXs) of SCs & STs (pOA) Act, 2015. 2- lt is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 11 as wetl as the learned counset for respondent No.2/de facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to compound the offences and to record cbmpromise between both the parties.

3. The learned Additional Pubric prosecutor has opposed the compromise petitions.

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l-A-Nos.2 & 3 of 2o2s which discloses that he has willingly consented for compromise. since the parties were willing to enter \ \\ .l .: 2 Crlp-12681 EfD, J -2025 intocompromise,theyweregivenachancetosettlethematterby appearingalongwiththeirrespectivecounselbeforetheHighCourt LegalservicesCommifteefortheStateofTelanganavideorders dated2s.og.2o25passedbythisCourt.Thereafter,theSecretary, High court Legal services committee is directed to identify the parties and submit a report to that effect'

5.PursuanttotheabovesaiddirectionissuedbythisCourt,the partiesalongwiththeirrespectivecounselhaveappearedbeforethe HighCourtLegalservicesCommitteefortheStateofTelanganaand the secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 13-10-2025 stating that the parties were identifiedandtheyhavewillfully,withoutanyGoercion,enteredinto compromise.

6.lnviewoftheabove'l'A'Nos'2and3of2O2Sareallowed' consequenily, the criminal Petition is atlowed and the proceedings s.c.No.206 0f 2017,on the file of the special court for scs & srs Act at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District' registered against petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 11, are hereby quashed subject to petitioners paying an amount of Rs'5'000/- (Rupees Five Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare and Rs.5,000/- ) , 3 ETD. J Crlp_|2681 _2025 (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the High court Legal services committee for the state of retangana, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and fire proof of the same before the Registry. 7 - Miscellaneous apprications, if any pending, shail stand crosed. \ To, SD/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO REGTSTRAR _/ //TRUE COPYII ON OFFICER 1 The Special Court SC & ST at LB Nagar, Hyderabad 2. The station House officer, peddemuiporice station, Ranga Reddy 3. Two ccs to public prosecutor, High court tor tre state of relangana at 4. One CC to Sri Malla Reddy Sankati, Advocate tOpUCl 5. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] W ABK /PSL Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise Note: Totar Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand onry )-Has been paid by sri Malla Reddy sankati, counsel for the Petitioners as directed by the Hon,ble court vide order dated 24.10.202s as Rs. s,oOo/- ( Rupees Five thousand onry ) to the "Director, sainik werfare, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the High court Legal services committee for the state of Telangana, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 122192 of 2025 and Receipt No. 1736 dated 21-11_2OZS. ,t t1 ff!84 .l Il * s .vt ' . rif..1 ' . .:;,, HIGH COURT DATED: 2411012025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.12681 ot 2O25 l ALLOWING THE I.A.Nos.2 and 3 ot 2025 AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION IN THE COURT 20 OF TELENGANA BETWEEN: @ Anjappa I. Boini Anjilappa S/o Boini Ashappa, Age: 28 yrs, Caste: Mudiraj, Occ: Agrl, R/o H. No. I-gg, Marepally (v) Peddernul Mandal, Vikarabad Disfricr

2. Boini yadappa S/o Boini Ashaor Y,0,.0,"'#:':[1i:Tr: }1i::f:?oi,lllt peddemur ,": r,fi ?i,;: irunaul

3. Boini Narsimulu S/o Boini Balaona ano. .tt .ryrai.u.;,"'oi;:'f;,:ffr'; Marepally ry) peddemul Vikarabad Disrrict ril; .i:; ilunaut,

4. Boini Narsimulu #FI #, #ff::,,, 19 rJaaerur rurunou r,'iilr*raua f,:": iil:; ;T"' ^lJ,t

5. Boini Venkahppa S/oBoini Luxmuo, .Y*'; ;; ffr :#i'iJ.i :1r,"' yil:::,r1! reodem,r M;;; ,1*u,uaua

6. Chapali Ravi 36 vrs, casre: Mudiraj, :::,tffiiff::fr 1ge: -'' Peddem u r r,"o,i, T:i;#ffi[ffirrv ryj" i\ I 2t

7. Boini Narsimulu S/o Laxmappa, Age: 3l yrs,caste: Occ: Agrl, R/o H.No. l_26 Marepally (V) peddernul Mandal, Vikr;;;;;isricr Mudiraj, Naresh g..Boini S/oBoini Ra rVrudiraj, "#Hi, ffi ,il:l -.#*, #il::l,r ru pJoi",,, r,,r"i, vikarabad

9. Boini Srinivas S/o Boini Han iVrud iraj, o;;; ffi?lfi: ;J I: r.*,., Ivlarepally (V) peddem District ul Mandal,Vikarabad

10. Boini Srinivas S/o Boini Ramar .yro,.,i ;*','T.i:i,lr:.r:,il:' (v) peddemrr i _.r?'., rurunaui, iirca,uaua "Yil::l,t I L Gali Chiraniivi S/o Janardhun, ig", 26 yrs,Caste: Mudiraj, occ: Agrl, R/o H. No ,ro,iin"r Banfwara m Mandal, Vikarabad District ^r,0, u,,,u*., i;o,,. Hj,l:l[:f rera nsatnaRep by,fy I'f;:ffJffiTIYderabad -__ trirst Partylpetitioner :::,Tff[fj' Age: 65 vrs, casre: Lambada (s.r), p"aa",nlii'rur"ul;TTffi #fT,l,Y"'anpattvYiuage, ___Respondents I.. Itis have decid submitted that the petitioner ed to live amicabry a,d incordiar ."tu,ion.2. as well a.s the Respondent/complainant )----:= - I a I I I i I i I I i i 1 .j I The2'dRespondent along with him husband' who from his childhood days working with and staying with the first petitioner at'him.residence and as are rvell known to each other' -'\'i -. ,' I ' i .. *ate

3.Laterlstpetitionerhadmaritaldisputeswithhimhusbandleadingtoa divorcb between them. Beirig toyal to the husband the 2nd respondent and him husband had disputes with the l't petitioner who was the divorced wife' 4. Unfortunately certain unpleasant disputes took pffi at the instigation of third parties.against the Petitioner and the,2nd Respondent and have come to realizethe good.iid Auyt they had with the petitioner and Respoddent' " i., .i t

5. As such theldrespondentanddiscussed.withthepetitionerandhim to have an amicable and peaceful existence to which the petitioner' family In the said circumstances the Petitioner herein on the one side and the 2nd 6. Respondent, entered into a Memorandum of compromise dtd- a7-09-2025 by which they decided to close the cases frled by them against each other'

7. Accordingly the petitioner withd.rew on the file of the Hon'ble High Court which he filed against the 2"d respondent, for enhancement of sentence, _bv Hon'ble Court as withdrawn: g. The second responded and petitioner state that they weib instigated by third parties inimical to the petitioner and today they realize that there is no need for any enmity or strained relations for them with the petitiondr' In these circumstalces both the parties herein pray that this Hon'ble court to record the compromise and quash the proceeding by w4y of compounding the offences againsr the petitioner in sc. No 206 of 2017 onth" frl" of the courr of o :-{ SC ST Court, L.b.nagar, Rang4 Reddyand pass such other further orders as:re deemed just and "TYry in the circumstances of the case. i \ I A96 L7' l. Rathod Laxman Petitioner / Respondent No-2 D.brfl,b) L. BoirilAnjilappa @ AnjaPPa s 7''4/l

2. Boini Yadappa .-- -r i"- '-' r g,,f,al.z, -

4. Boini Narsimulu ,B o

7. Narsimulu *{\ gJ' 9 'b)' 10. Boini Srinivas s7a&r&J 5. Boini Venkatappa F.F'{

8. Boini Naresh Cs) &fidt'fr I l. Gali Chiranjivi , F,hls,,"' 3. Boini Narsimulu ,uW \

6. Chapali Ravi > @ rg'44 9. Boini Srinivas FIRST PARTY -lr a i