✦ High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Sep 2025
Length
1,609 words

Smt.T.Kavitha Arram, Wo_Arram Chandan Kumar, Aged about 3g years, Occ.Housewife, R/o H.No.2-3 -64110112, Jaiswal Gardei, Near Little ilowei School, Amberpet, Hyderabad. Mohd Abdul tlhaja- Moinuddin, S/o Naseeruddin, Aged about 43 years, Occ.Business, F/o Mustabad Village and Mandal, Rajanna Sircilla District, Telangana State. Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cou( may be ...RESPONDENTS pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one ir Mandamus declaring the high-handed action of the r pressurizing the petitioners lo setfle the civil disputes I petitioner Nos. 1,2 and 4 and respondent Nos. 5 and 6 vij and OS.No.682 of 2025 on the file of Hon'ble principal Karimnagar in respect of the property admeasuring 105 Sr1 shed with a plinth area of 1 10 Sq. feet, the residential plol Sq. Yards and the residential plot admeasuring to an exter t covered by Sy.No.187, situated at Chinthakunta Village of I of Karimnagar District, more particularly shown as Schedrr 2024 and Schedule A and B in OS.No.682 of 2O2S respect the suits and to register the sale-deed/s and deliver the suit r favour of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 by calling the petitione No.4 police station, is highly iltegal, arbitrary, without jurisdi,; of lrlterim lnjunction order dated 1B-OS-2025 in lA.Nol247 of : 2025 besides in violation of Art.14, 21 , 300_A of Constitu various judgments of this Hon'ble Court as well as the Hc r consequently direct the respondent No. 4 not to pressurize th the civil disputes so also not to dispossess lhem from the ; covered by O.S.No. 335 of 2024 OS.No.682 of 2025 p,z Principal Junior Civil Judge at Karimnagar at the behest of r: 6, in the interest of .iustice. the nature of Writ of rspondent No. 4 in ending between the > OS.No.335 of 2024 lunior Civil Judge at yards along with Tin admeasuring 231.46 of 245.48 Sq. Yards, othapally (H) Mandal : B in OS.No.335 of vely and to withdraw chedule properties in "s to the respondent ion, flagrant violation 1025 in OS.No.682 of ion of lndia so also 'ble Apex Court and : petitioners to settle rit schedule property rding on the file of ;pondent Nos. 5 and lA NO: 1 OF 202s Petition under Section 15i CpC praying that in the ci.r the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court m€) the respondent No.4 not to pressurize the petitioners to s() with the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 so also not to disposser;r schedule B property in O.S.No. 335 of 2024, Schedule A arr 2025 pending on the file of principal Junior Civil Judge ir behest of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 during the pendency of tt r interest of justice. umstances stated in be pleased to direct tle the civil disputes them from the suit I B in OS.No.682 of Karimnagar at the Writ Petition, in the Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI C KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6: -- The Court made the following: ORDER 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVI .N KUMAR ORDER: WRIT PETITION No.293rt4 of 2025 Hearcl lc:rrned counsel for the petitioners and earned Assistant Govcrnment Pleacler for Home appearing for. responder t Nos.1 to 4. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for dispo:;r l at the admission stagc itself.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking the follora.i -rg prayer:- " to declare tlr rctiort of the rcspondent No.4 in prt: petitioners to scttle the ciuil disprrtcs peuling betTt)een 1 Nos.7, 2 nrul 4 nnd respotdent Nos.S and 6 oide O.S.No. and ().5. No.682 of 2025 on tlrc file of llott'ble principrl Irrrige nt Nl-arintnngnr, in respect o.f tlrc property adn.t Sq.ynrds, nlottg zoith Titt slrcd tuitlt n plinth nrea of 7,1 residentinl plot ndtnetsurirtg 237.46 Sq.yards nnd the r:. admetturrin g ta in c:itenl of 245.48 Sq.ynrds, co?eretl l! situded al AtinLlmktLntn Villnga of KoLhnptlly (H) Knimnngar District, nore pnrticLtlnrly slnton ns Sche,l No.335 of 2024 nid Scfudule A nnd B in OS No r respectiuely nnd to uithdrnto tlrc suits nnd to register t, and delitter tlrc suit sclrcr Lle proparties in t'aoourif resl:c and 6 by calling the petitionars to the respondent No.4 pol highly i llegnl, nrbitrnry, tL, itl tu t t j urisdiction, Jlngrnn, Interim Injunctnn order dnted 18.09.2025 in l.A. No.2.t O.5.No.682 of 2025 besides itt uiolation of Art. 14, 2-1 Constitutioq of lndin so nlso rnnotts jtrtlgmcnts of tltis I lL t zoell ns the Hon'ble Apex Court utd conscqtLently direct ttt No.4 not to pressu'ize the petitioncrs lo scttle the ciail dis not to dispossess tlrcm .from tlt suit sclrcdule propcrty .o,.) No.335 of 2024, O.5.No.682 of 2025, pending on tlu Jtt Junior Cittil ltdgc Knrinrnngur, nI the behest of resp t nnd 6." ;urizing the rc petitioner s35 of 2024 lunior Cittil rcuring 105 Sq.feet, the idential plot Sr1 No.187, Mnndal of 'le B in OS 82 o/ 2025 e snle deeds dent Nos.5 ce stntion is t iolntion of ' of 2025 in ttd 300A o.f bb Court as respondent rutes so tlso 'red by O.S. of P rincipal dent Nos.5

3. Brief facts statcrl in this writ peLition are tl-nt petit ( ners' clairns that their grandfathel i.c., Shaik Moulana Ali, l.ras succeeded 1arr, adrneasuring to an extent of Ac.01 .30 Gts, in Survcy No,1gZ situated at Chi r hakunta Village, Kothapally Manclal, Karimnagar l)istrict, from his ancest )rs. rt is further 2 subrdtted that from the above extent of land, certain extent of land was affected in SSRP Project and certain extent of land was grabbed by some land grabbers and only Ac.00.25 gts, (hereinafter referrecl as 'subiect rand') got remained with tl-rc petitioners a,tr in trre year 2006, pctitioner's names were rnutated in thc rcvenue rccorcls. The case of the petitioners is that on

08.05.2024, rcspondent Nos.S and 6, along with one Mr.Jagadisl.r Kumar Rao, tried to interfcre with the petitioners' peaceful possession o'er the subjcct propcrty, hcnce, the petitior-rcrs filed OS.No.335 of 2024 and O.S.No.6g2 of 2025 and the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Karimr.ragar, (hereir-rafter referrcd as 'Trial Court'), zride ir.rterim order dated 78.09.2025 in I.A.No.247 of 2025 in os.No.682 of 2025, restrained the rcspo,cient Nos.5 and 6 from interfering in thc subject propcrty. Further case of petitioners is that the respondent No.4 is calling the petitioners to the police station and is pressurizing them to vacate thc subject property ar-rd hand ovcr the possession to respondent Nos.5 and 6. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed.

4. Learned Assistant Govcrnment pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 placed on record instructions issued by the station House Officer, Kothapally Policc Station, Karimnagar District, wherein it is submitted that on 01.09-2025, the petitioners had approached the respondent No.2 and filed a reprcsentation z;idz C.No.1087ICCC/2025 dated 01.09.2025. On such representation, GD entry was made on 02.09.2O,25 aide page No.53 in Sl.No.13 and the petitioners were called to the police station for the purpose of enquiry. It is further submittecl that thc respondent authorities neithcr J interfere in the civil clisputes nor had pressurized the petitit t ers to hand over the possession of the subject property to respondent Nos.5 a I I 6

5. Recording the submissions made by learned couns rl appearing on either side and without expressing any opinion on the merrt of the case, this writ petition is dispose of ciirecting respondent authorit t ; to follow due procedure as contemplated under law for further course of er .ion

6. With the abovc dircction, this writ pctition ; disposed of Miscellaneous applicatiorrs, if anv pcnding, shall stand clrsr r . No order as to To, SD/-I .BHAVANI SWAMY ASSI: ;TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secreli Telangana, Hyderabad. riat, The State of

2. The Commissioner of Police, Karimnagar District at Karit 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Economic o Commissionerate building, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Disl r 4. The lnspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Poli building, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. 5. One CC to SRl. C KUIVAR, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court for the State o 7. Two CD Copies nagar. tence Wing, Police lt. )e Commissionerate telangana. [OUT] PVL BS EP, HIGH COURT DATED:2410912025 )( I o O EH S lA15 JAl{ 2U6 * l PAT t I :t ,z !)A .{i ORDER WP.No.29344 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS o? o\'*

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments