The High Court · 2025

5. P. Udaya Sri, w/o G. lt4urali ltilohan aged about 34 years, Occ Rio H.No. 2-257l1,Gandhi Nagar Colony Jadcherla, Village lt4ahabubnagar Distrrct, Telangana. House wife, and N4andal ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an approprrate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein in taking action against the respondents No. 4 & 5 pursuant to the complaint dt. 30-08-2025 in spite of repeated visits made by the petitioner , as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust. and consequently, direct the respondent No. 3 herein to register a criminal case against the respondent i No ,1 and 5 forthwith act upon the complaint dt. 30-08-2025 and take action in a I :ordance with Law lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in th€, I 'cuntstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Ccr l may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 herern to register a crirr i ia ,lase against the respondents No. 4 & 5 pursuant to the petitioner complain. lt. 30-08-2025, during pendency of the main Writ Petition wlth the interest of .1ust r e Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MANDA ADAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: AGP FOR HOMt: Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : --- The Court made the following: ORDER a.) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SH RAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.2941O of 2025 l'his writ pctition is filcd seeking the follou,ing prayer: "...cleclannq the inaction of the Respondent Nos.2 ancl 3 herein in laking action against the respondents No.4 otld 5 pursuant to the complaint dt.30.08.2025 in spite of repeated ursits made bg the petitioner as beinq illegal, ctrbitrary and urtjust artd cortsequently direct respondent No.3 herein to reqister a ciminal case aqainst the resportdettts No.4 and 5 and fortfut'ith act upon the complaint dt.30.08.2025 and take action in ctccordance utith La ut..."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. I to 3. With their consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal. Notice to respondent Nos.4 and 5 is herebv dispensed u,ith

3. The facts of the case in brief as stated are that petitioner clairns to be absolute owner and possessor of house propertv admeasu ring 57 4 .28 sq.vds., i,it Jadcherla Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District purchased ) uide Doc.No.14956 12021 dated 15.11.202 1 regrstered the office of SRO, Jadcherla Mandal, Iv ahabubnagar 111 Drstrict. It is submitted that respondent No. -1 atrd .5 s lro are pet.itiorrer's brother-in lan, and sister hi.rl ( ired a plan to grab the petitiorler's housc propel'tr/ \ rithollI z ir.r' tttanrtur of right zrnd locked the said house aud kept tht kc"'s in their custody, as thc petitione r is sta-r,ing in SanlirL Redd-r'for the purpose of business. In that regard, petitiorrr: has lodgecl a complaint before respondcnt No.2 requestinl, o take action argainst rcspondent Nos.4 and 5 on 30.08.2 ( 25. Hon'ever, no action has been ir-ritiated till date. Q, :stioninll the same, the present writ petition is filed. zl. The Sub Inspector ol Police. ..1:rr:herla l)olice Station. Mahabubnagar District has placr 1 a co1;,v of lnstructions through learned Assistant Government Plcader for Home and would submit that 1 asir-rg on the complainr of the petitioner d:r.ted 3t) t8.2025, the resp<>ndent police has macle a GD Entrt, r nd taken up er-rquiry. During the enquiry, it is revealed t rt neithc:r- the pctitioner's mother nor the petitioner's si:;1t r is found in thc subject house "i-rh fn.t thel, arc residir-1 in USA. It is : I i ! I l l t: i l i I l I Y 3 further submitted that since the dispute is with regard to house propertlr, the complaint ol tl'ie petitioner was closed :rs 'Civil in Nature' on 23.O9.2O25 and suggested the petitioner to approach appropriate Court for redressal and informed the samc to t}-rc petitiotlcr' As sltch respondent No.3 cot-rductecl er-rquiry and closed tl-re complaint as 'Civil in Nature'and the allegation that respondent No 3 has not conducted enquiry is false and baseless atld accordingly prayed to dismiss the \\'rit petition.

5. In that vieu' of the matter, since thc complaint of the petitioner has already been closecl as civil in nature' this writ petition is clisposed of s'ith a d irection to respondent authorities to follorv d ue procedure as contemplated under of lalr' for further course of action, if any. Needless to state, petitioner may seek appropriate remedy as availabie under lau'. Miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs' SD/- A.SREENIVAS REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1 2 The Princioal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat Secretariat Buildings' iii" bi"t" 6it;langani HYderabad' The Superintendent of Police(SP) ' Jadcherla ' tr/lahabubnagar District' Telangana

3. The Station House Officer, Jadcherla Police station J; lcherla lvlahabubnagar District, Telangana

4. One CC to SRI IVANDA ADAlVl. Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State rf Telangana [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies PVL GJP 7 I HIGH COURT DATED:1511012025 f II SEH o(. Ox.: ..\ (r. i 6 rtB lUla .cl J. * U: jfy,f * o ORDER WP.No.29410 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @L'f^" B\\