P. Venkat Reddy v. Authority, Uppal, Ranga Reddy District East
Case at a glance
- Bench
- S ANANDA REDDY
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 19(1)(g), 226
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 207
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, especially, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the seizure of the petitioner vehicle bearing No. AP 11T 7623 vide vehicle check report No. 2850736 dt. 18-5-2005 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to release the petitioner vehicle bearing No. AP11T 7623 immediately and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CH.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR TRANSPORT The Court at the admission stage made the following:
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the action of the respondents in not releasing his vehicle bearing No.AP11T 7623 seized by the respondents on certain alleged irregularities specified in the Vehicle Check Report No.2850736 dated
18.05.2005. According to the petitioner, even if certain irregularities have been committed, for any proposed action, the authorities have to conduct an enquiry under Section 207 of the Motor Vehicles Act,
1988. It is stated that such an enquiry is still pending and pending the enquiry, the vehicle has to be released in terms of the order of the Division Bench of this Court. Therefore, he sought a direction for release of his vehicle. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Transport appearing for the respondents. In the circumstances, the respondents are directed to release the petitioner’s vehicle within a period of one week on condition of the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only), on payment of tax, if any due, and further on condition of the petitioner giving an undertaking that he shall not alienate or encumber the vehicle, pending completion of the enquiry proposed by the respondents. It is made clear that the release of the vehicle as well as the payment of Rs.5,000/- by the petitioner shall be subject to the outcome of the enquiry and the order that is going to be passed by the respondents. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. _______________
07.06.2005 Note: Sent the Operative portion by wire at party’s cost. (b/o) VGB To 1 The Additional Registering Authority, Regional Transport Authority, Uppal, Ranga Reddy District East. 2 The Motor Vehicle Inspector, D.L. Testing Ground, Nagole, Hyderabad. 3 2CCs to the Government Pleader for Transport, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. (OUT) 4 2CD copies.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.