High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass order or orders or directions one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the in-action of the Respondent no. 2 in disposing the Review Application No. E-N359132 filed on 30-07 -2024 before the Respondent No. 2 under section 18 of the TS-bPASS Act, 2020 as per the orders dated '19-07- 2024 of the Hon'ble High Court passed in W.P,No. 19'109 of 2O24 with respect to the consideration of building permissron for 1 Ground plus 2 Upper Floors in plots no. 1 to '16 of the petitioner's land bearing Sy.No. 44 part, of net plots area admeasuring 7149.76 Sq.Mtrs of Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.. as illegal, arbitary and against the principles of natural justice consequently direct Respondent No. 2 to dispose the Review Application No. E-N359'132 filed on 30-07 -2024 before the Respondent No. 2 under sectron 1B of the TS-bPASS Acl,2020 as per the orders dated 19-07-2024 of the Hon'ble High Court passed in W.P.No. 19109 of 2024 by givrrrg direction to the Respondent no. 3 to consider petitioner's aoplication No. 000 1 72lGHMC 1007 I I SLP 1 12024-BP dated 06-01 -2025 for granting permission to construct the buildinry by receiving the necessary permission fee as per the act. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court ma y be pleased to direct the officials of the Respondent no. 3 to remove the footpat.h laid before the main gate of the p-.trtioner's land bearing Sy.No. 44 part, of net plots area admeasuring 7149.16 Sq.Mtrs of Gachibowli Village, Seriling;rmpally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District immediately to avoid inconvenience to his way to enter his vehicles in to his Iancl and proper in the circumstances of the casr). Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI R.BALA SUBRAMANYAM Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DE\/ Counsel for Respondent No.2&3 : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY. SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE B. VIIAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29027 OF 2025 ORDEII (oRAL) Tiris writ petition is llled by the petitioner seeking to declare the action or respondents No.2 and 3 in not taking any action pursuant to his revlew rrpplication dated 30.07.2024 with regard to the building permission for ground + 2 upper floors in Plot Nos. I to 16, admeasuriitg

7149.76 square meters in Sun,ey No.44 part, situated at Gachiboivli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as being illegal. arbitrar; and unconstitutional.

2. Ij,,:ard Mr. R.Balasubrahmanyam, leamed counsel lbr the petitioni'i; Mr. G.Madhusudan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel lbr GHMC. appearing ior resporrdents No.2 and 3; and perused the rnaterial on recorii.

3. The casc of the petitioner is that his building pennission applicatir.rn dated 06.01.2024 in respect of the subject propertl' 1br construct ion ol ground | 2 upper lloors was revoked by lctter daleci

05.07.2(,)4- Challenging tht: same, the petitioner filed W.P. No.19109 o1 2024 an(. the sar.ne u,as disposed of by the order dated 19.07.2024 by giving liberty to the petitioller to avail rernedy of revie* ap,plic:ili,-rrr \ .- 'l-'1 2 belore the respordcnt authorities. In compliance of the said older, the petitioner t'ilc<l re view application dated 30.07.1024 unde r Sectirrn I 8 of .Ielangana State Building Permission Approval and S,:lf tlerrification System Act, 202)) [for short 'Act'] before respondents ,rlo.2 and 3 challenging tlre revocation order ude Lr.No.00011?,lGt{NlC10079l SI-P1/2024-8P da ed 05.07.2024. The grievance of the petitionr:r is that so far the review aoplication has not been enteftained and ordcrs have not been passed. As the re is inordinate delay on the part of- rhe re., pondent authorities in disposing of the rev I e\\' application of the p<'titioner, she was constraine(l to approach this Cour1.

4. Leamed Starrding Counsel for GIIMC subrnitted that .hr reVlcw application o1'the p,etitioner will be dul1, considered as exlteditiously as possible.

5. In the circunrsr:ances, this writ petition is disposed of rlirecting respondents No.2 md 3 to consider the review application dated

30.07.2024 rvith regard to the building permission lbr gror.urd'1 2 upper floors in Plot Nos.i :o 16, admeasuring 7149.7 6 square nretors 'i Survey No.-14 part, situatec at Gachibowli Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy l)istrict. by giving opportunitl, of hearing to the pr titioner, ) and pasr; appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four (4, weeks from the date of receipt of a copy ol this ordcr. There stLsll be no order as to costs. A: a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ ;retition, stand closed. SD/-G. JYO ANT REGIS R -.-2 //TRUE COPY// TION OFFICER To, '1 . The Principal Secretary, MA Secretariat, State of Telan 2. The Chairman, The District Building Committee, GHtVlC, Tank Bund, , Hyderabad. Hyderabad.

3. The Commissioner. Greater Hyderabad Muncipal Corporation, Tankbund, Hyderabad.

4. One CC to SRI R BALA SUBRAMANYAM, Advocate lOPUCl 5. Two CCs to GP FOR IVICPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 6 One CC to SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC. IOPUCI 7. Two CD Copies. \ d.BSK S HIGH COURT DATED:1411012025 I ,)\' \ ")\ -) L} I04L T Yi,,'\ee ORDER WP.No.2902'l ot 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I ,r{