The High Court · 2025

- 2.Smt.t\/adiraluChetana'Wo.BramhamdamP-h.anindraSivaKishore,Aged4l ;;;,'o;; S;ii*;re Emotovee R/o H No 3-3-5t2tDt2, B.ha-rat Nasar Colonv' Stri-'et ttto.z. Ramanthdpui, Amberpel. Hyderabad-50001 3 ... ResPondents PetitionunderSectionS28ofBNSSprayingthatinthecircumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR No' 213 of 2O23 on the file of WPS INSP (DD) Hyd (HYderabad)' t.A. NO :3OF 2024 Between: Smt. Madiraiu Chetana, Wo. Bramhamdam Phanrn-dra Siva Kishore' Aged 41 ;;=.-O;;. So'ftware Emptovee, Rlo H No 3-3-5/2/Dt2.Bharal Nagar Colony' Stiir.t r.fo z. iamanthdpui, Amberpet. Hyderabad-SOO013 ...Petitioner / Defacto Complainant ANO l sri Bramhamdam phanindra siva Kishore, S/o. Late B.V.s. Raman, Aoed 43 vrs, occ. software Emprovee, Rlo H No.3-J-stiiod anirail.iuiJi iorony, Street No 2 Ramanthapur, Amberpet, Hvol,"oro, TLLfi"?iJsiiSdii "' 2. Brahmandarn ,Aruna Rekha, Wo. Late B.V.S.Raman, Aoed 65 vrs Occ_ Pensioner, R/r H.No..3_3_512tDt2, Bh",ri N;gr;-'d.i;"";, !i,."rJi rv".Z, Ramanthapur,,\mberpet, Hyderabad, felangina_50001 3 Rep by GPA Holder Bramhamdam phanindra Siva Kishore 3 rhe state orreransana, throush rrr,,";::'#;::ffi::'J:Trs tA1' A2 Hyderabad Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the [vemorandum of Grounds of criminar petition,the Hrgh court may be pleased to record rhe compromise and quash the proceedings rn FrR No. 213 of 2023 on the fire of wps rNSp (DD) Hyd (Hyderabad) and be preased to pass This Petition c.ming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N Krishna sumanth, Advocate for the petitioners and the Additionar pubric prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 'r and of sri Venugopar Jurakanti, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following Common Order : 7 \ \ HON'BLE SMT. JUS'TTCE JUWADT SRIDEVI I.A.No.3 o t2024 in/and CRIMINAL PET TTION No.l 2992 a f2024 CO MMON oRDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS by the petitioners/accused Nos'l and 2 to quash the proceedings against them in F'I'R'No'213 of 2O23 of Women PoliceStation,INSP(DD),Hyderabad,registeredforthe offences punishable under Sections 498,\' 417 and506 of IPC' It is submitteC by learned counsel appearing for the 2. petitioners as well as the respondent No'2' that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition' the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly' I'A'No'3 of 2024 has been fited to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences'

3. Vide order dated 07'01'2025' this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee' High Court for the State ofTelangana' Hyderabad' for identihcation and to submit a report. , 2

4. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High C,ourt Legal Services Committee, has identified the pafties and submitted a report, dated 09.01 .2025 andthe same is placed on record.

5. In vir:w of the above, I.A.No.3 of 2024 i-s allowed. Consequently, this Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos. l and 2 in F.I.R.No.2l .) of 2023 of Women police Station, tNSp (DD), Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/- MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR .sJCTION OFFICER I To,

1. The Xlll Additional Chief Mekopolitan Magistrate at Nampally Hyderabad 2 The Station House Officer, WPS INSP (DD) Hyderabad PS, Hyderabad District

3. Two CCs to the f)ublic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri N Krishna Sumanth, Advocate [OPUC] 5 One CC to Sri Venugopal Julaknati, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies I Along with the Oopy of the Joint lVlemo of Compromise ] Vtugh W t).! Lr' HIGH COURT DATED:2210112025 COMMON ORDER l.A.No.3 of 2024 in / and CRLP.No.12992 ot 2024

1.r.i: S l4/ ( F o 3 0 iA;,i Zi(r t a€g6,61refF t ( a ,+ ALLOWING BOTH THE I.A. & THE CRLP q Od' JY $v -5 v' ( IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHESTATEOFTELANGANA AT IIYDEIIABAD CRLP NO oF 2024 Between: 1. Sri Bramharhdam Phanindra SivaKishore, S/o: Late B.V.S.Raman, Aged: 43 yrp, Occ: Software EmPloYee, R /o r'H.No.3 -3 - 5 /2lD /2, Bharat Nagar Colony, Street No.2; Ramanthapur, Amberpet, Hyderab ad, Telangana-500013.

2. Brahmandam Aruna Rekha, Wo. Late B.V.S.Raman, Aged: 65 yrs, Occ: Pensioner, R/o: H.No.3-3-5/2tD12, Bharat Nagar Colony, S treet No.2, Ramanthapur, Amberpet, Hyderab ad, Telangana-500013. Rep by GPA Holder Bramhanidam Phanindra Siva Kishore

1. The State ofTelangana Through Public Prosecutor of High Court at Hyderabad.

2. Smt. Madiraju Chetan4 Wo Bramhamdam Phanindra SivaKishore, Aged: 41 yrs, Occ: Software EmPloYee, R"/o: H.No.3-3-5l2lDlz, Bharat Nagar Colony, Street No.2, Ramanthapur, Amberpet. Hyderabad-500013. ...Petitioner/Al &A2 ...Respondents JOINT MEMO FTI,ED BYTHE PEI'ITIONERS AND 2ND RESPONDENT

1. The Petitioners are accused in FIR No. 213 0f 20230n the file ofwps INSP (DD) Hyd (Hyderabad) for the offence under Section 498-A,417,506 of IPC { 2' respondent cnter( d into c( That crue irLtervention of erders and we, wishers, trre petitioner ancr the 2,d p arti es h erero n u,.. ... o, ul1;ol; ffi::T:* j :[ #,o*:, J:::,,; settle their difl'erences and , of the same the 2nd res|ondenr intends ro withdraw rhe present ."#ll;;t-**e That due to rhe intervention of erders and well-wishers the petitioners and 3' the 2nd rupondent has entered into compromise. 4. That the l.t petitioner and 2nd respondent has e t0'2o24and as per;he said MoU the r.,petitioner anltr:i Jr###i,iJ; FCOp No. t!3 4tZOZq on the file of the Hon,ble F Disrricr ar L'B.Naga;' seeking dissorution or,rarriage ilffi:i::,:anga 5' That the 2'd respondent has undertaken to withdraw the FIR No. 213 0f Reddv 2023 dated I I _04_201t 3. 6' That ar the :laims between both the parties arising out of their matrimoniar Iife past' present and future have been settled as fuiry and fina,y. 7 That the petitioners and 2nd respondent undertake that no further case shall be filed against each ,rther in the nature "f.iril ;;; criminal nature and rhey shar nor inrerrere in :acrr;;;";",;':::::"'' l'1 other life hereafter and they are free to read their independent lives r.r,ithout indirect interrerence: and borh side ramlies shar ha,.e "r,J;J',[1J:::ffi: --, As such we have filed a petition seeking the Flon'ble Court to record the compromise. The contents mentioned in the said compromise petition are true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. The said compromise is without any undue influence from entered with our free will and consent anyone. Hence, we are filing the present Joint Memo' .and I-Ience the Joint Memo' B DAM P}IANINDRA SIVA KUMAR AMARUNAREKHA B Rep by GPA Holder Brimhamdam Phanindra Siva Kishore , ,E ,,i. ]ii Iri liltI | 'ill l'i ,i l'r lL i 1 i I I r I CO SE,L F R PETITIONERS MADIRAru CHETANA COTINSEL FOR 2ND RESPONDENT I