The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction rnore particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandariaus, declaring the inaction of Respondent No.3 to 6 for non- issuing of the digital Patta pass book in the name of Petitioner in respect of land Adm.Ac.00-0SGts.,inSy.No.l04ier,situatedinPallabuzuruVillage'Narayanpet Mandal and District and direct the Respondent No. 3 to 6 to demolish the illegal and unauthorized structures raised by Respondent No. 7 in and over the land Adm.Ac.oo-08Gts.,inSy.No.104/GssituatedinPallabuzuruVillage,Narayanpet Mandal and District and direct the Respondent No. 3 to 5 to issue the digital patta pass book in favour of the Petitioner in respect of land Adm. Ac. 00-08 Gts., in Sy.No.104/e9, situated in Pallabuzuru Village, Narayanpet Mandal and District' lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cout: restrain the Respondent No.3 to 7 from inaugurating tl t illegally constructed in and over the patta land of the Peti'i Gts., in Sy.No;104/e9, situated in Pallabuzuru village, Nar ;umstances stated in may be pleased to Commercial shops ,ner Adm. Ac.00- 0B ryanpet Mandal and District lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courl direct the Respondent No.3 to 6 to dispose the online applic No. 2500005855, dated 30-01-2025 and Bhubhar:1l 8R2500000371 dated 11-08-2025 made by the petitioner ir Ac.00-08 Gts., in Sy.No.104ier, situated in Pallabuzurtr ;umstances stated in may be pleased To rtion vide application ri application No. 'espect of land Adm. village, Narayanpet Mandal and District Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.KUMARA SWAMY FOR Si ll POLICE VENKAT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l,3 TO 5: GP FOR REVEIIJ JE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR MPCL ADMN E, JRBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA Fll DDY, SC FOR REDDY MPCL Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI Dr. N.UMA SHANK,I 1, SC FOR AMC The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE E.V.VENUCTOPAL WRIT PETTTION No.2895O of2025 ORDER: Heard Sri B.Kumara Swamy, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr.N.Uma Shankar, learned Standing Counsel for Agriculture Market Committee, appearing on behalf of respondent No.7 and Sri Puttal Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.6 Municipality. perused the record.

2. l,earned counsel for the petitioner u,ould submit that the petitioner is the General power of Attorney Holder of legal heirs of the protected tenant in respect of land admeasuring Ac.O.O8 gutnas in Sy.No. LO4 /AA, situated in Pallabuzuru Village, Narayanapet Mandal and District. The original landlords are in possession and enjoyment of the property and accordingly their narnes were entered into the pattadar books by virtue of succession and accordingly 38-E certificate under the provisions of the A.p (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, I95O was issued by respondent no.4- Revenue Divisional Officer, 2 Narayanpet vide fine No.B/5005/75/2 an.. the original owners are in cultivation of the said land . -om l9S4-55 onwards. The legal heirs of the original protr ( t tenant have also been in enjoyment of the possession of tL : propertlz by virtue of succeSsion and their narnes har: been duly reflected in the old ROR records and as well r s in the new ROR, as well as in the Pahanies and their narr es have been entered into the pattadar passbooks.

3. It is further submitted that when the I rtitioner and other 38E holders obtained the revenue recorc s in the year 2019, then only they came to know that their names rvere deleted in the revenue records in possessor. i nd pattadar columns and the lands are reflecting as Government land/ Sarkari, without any proceedings. Aggr eved by the action of official respondents, the petitioner alc rg with 3gE certificate holders made a representation befort respondent No.3 on 05.11.2019, though it is acknowledll ,d, the said revenue records have not been rectified. Tt r reafter, the petitioner made online application yide application No.2500005855, dated 30.01.2025 (new [i ru Bharati petition No.BR25OOOOO371) for issuance of p,r;sbook and 3 mutation of names in revenue records. But, so far no action has been taken by the respondent despite the enquiry has been conducted by the Revenue Inspector on

18.08.2025 and filed report to the respondent No.5. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is frled by the petitioner seeking to pass direction to the respondent authorities.

4. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader ' for Revenue would submit that respondent authorities will consider the representations in accerdance with law.

5. l,earned Standing Counsel for respondent No.6 would submit that respondent No.6 is only formal party

6. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.7 would submit that the land in question has been allocated to respondent No.7 Agriculture Market Committee, Narayanpet and necessar5/ construction is under progress. Hence, he would seek to dismiss the writ petition.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and 4 learned Standing Counsel and after exam i material placed, this Court deems it approlr respondent No.3 to consider the applicatior petitioner on 31.OL.2025 arld examine the sz.r necessary notices to all the interested pit granting opportunity of hearing and pas s orders in accordance with law as expeditiousl preferably within a period of eight (0g) weeks I of receipt of a copy of this order. In. the nr parties to this writ petition are directed to marr Quo obtaining as on today in respect of property in all respects. ration of the iate to direct filed by the ee by issuing ties and by appropriate 'as possible 'om the date :antime, the tain Status- the subject

8. With the above directions, this writ petition disposed of. There shall be no order as to costr; 1S Miscellaneous applications, if any pen 1ing, shall stand closed SD/. s , ,.C.SULEKHA r iTANT REGTSTRAR / DEVI //TRUE COPY// To I

1. The Principal Secreta ry, Revenue Department, S Hyde rabad, State of Telangana. 2. The Principal Secreta ry, Municipal Administra tion and Ur Havi ng office at Sec reta riat, Hyderabad, Sta te of Telangi 3.7he Distri ct Collector, Narayanp et District. 4. The Re venue Divisional Officer, Narayan pet District, Tel: 5. The Ta hsildar, Nara yanpet Ma ndal, Nara yanpet District 6. The Commissioner Narayanpet Munici pality, Nara yanpe 7. The Secreta ry, Ag flcu Iture Market Com mittee, Na rayanp( Mandal, Narayanpet District. 8. One CC to SRI POLICE VENKAT REDDY, Ad vocate loF 9. Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE High Court for the State Hyderabad. [OUTl SECTION OFFICER z Building, t rn Development, lt a. rr gana State_ )istrict. )i Narayanpet rf telangana, at C^Jd. .. l ,. GJP ts sEl By[0#xs,#,0,5._?3x ,%J3,fiJrBB[ropuc] E$ dk-e- HIGH COURT DATED:1411012025 ORDER WP.No.28950 of 2025 i= ;i lHE S fA ( t f" ,t\l:.. *\?: 6 rlB lt)it tl 7l (:r .}.i * lg.,r-,_91 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS KS af"-l"e