✦ High Court of India · 23 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,154 words

Acts & Sections

Smt. Kota Sunitha, D/o. Gunapati Venkata Reddy, aged 44 years, Occ ; Household, R/o. Venugopala Puram Chamadala, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh. .....PETITIONER AND

1. The State Of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Power and Energy Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana, rep. by its Chairman AND Managing Director, Ivlint Compound, Hyderabad. 3. Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana, rep. by its Superintending Engineer (operation) Gachibowli Division, Hyderabad. 4. Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana, rep- by its Asst. Divisional Engineer (Operational) Chandanagar Section, Gachibowli.

5. Southern Power Drstribution Company Ltd., of Telangana, rep. by its Assistant Engineer (Operational) Chandanagar Sub Section, Gachibowli. 6. Greater Hyderabad l\ilunicipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, Serilingarupally Zone, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of Ihe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actton of the Respondents in not receiving the application for electricity connections to the Petitioners property bearing part of Plot No. 580, in survey No. 80, admeasuring 130 Sq. Yds (out of total admeasuring 200 Sq. Yds) situated at Prem Nagar, B Block, New Hafeezpet, Serrlingarnpa lly l\,4and rl, Rangareddy District as illegal, rrbitrary, unjust and consequently direct the respondents to receive the applica ic,n for the electricity connections and release the power supply with required rneters without any fu rther de lay. l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section i 5'l cpc praying that in the cir )umstances stated in the affidavrt filed in support of the petition, the High cour rray be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive application of the petition ,r and release power supply with required meters to the petitioner property bearin( i)art of plot No. 5g0, in survey No. 80, admeasuring i 30 sq. yds (out of totar : l,neasuring 200 Sq. Yds) situated at Prem Nagar, B Block, New Hafeezpet, Se lngampally [t/andal, Rangareddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s NIKITA GOENKA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Gp FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5 : SRI N.SREEDHAR F EDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDy The Court made the following ORDER - THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAXA ORDER: W.P.No.28937 of 2o25 Petitioner seeks a direction to respondents to receive her application and release service connection to her property bearing Plot No.580 in survey No.8O, admeasuring 13O sq. yards (out of total admeasuring 20O sq. yards) situated at Prem Nagar, B Block, New Hafeezpet, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioncr, learned Government Pleader for EnerS' on behalf of Respondent No'l, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 to 5 and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.6'

3. Ms. Nikita Goenka, learned counsel for pctitioner submits that in similar circumstances, while dealing with Writ Petition No. 19802 of 2025, this Court by order dt. |O-O7.2O25 directed the respondents authorities therein to release the service connection, and hence, requested this Court to pass similar order in this Writ Petition also.

4. Recently, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Raiendra Kumar Barjatga a. tl.P. Aaas Euam Vikas Parishad 1 , in the larger public interest, issued directions in addition to the directives I 2024 SCC Ontine SC 1767 2 issued in Re: Directions in the matter of d_emotitio;, of structures. Relevant for thc lturpose of this case are: "(iv) A11 the necessary service connections, sr_ch as, Elect-ricity, water supply, sewerage con t:ction, etc., shall be given by the service prr.,,ider / Board to the buildings only after the pr< cluction of the completion / occupation certihcat I (u) Even after issuance of completion ce t llcate, deviation / violation if any contrary _o the pian ning permission brought to the r I iice of the iruthority immediate steps be taker by the said :ruthority concerned, in accordan.t : with lavr', against the builder / owner / o< _- rpant; and the ofhcial, who is responsible for i ;suance of wrongful completion / occupation c( r- .ificate shall be proceeded departmentally forth.,, th. ("i) No permission / licence to condr L any business / trade must be given y1 &r1y authorities including local bodies ol States / Union Territories in arry unau I orised builcling irrespective of it being reside r tial or comrnercial building. (vii) The development must be in conform ti with the zonal plan land usage. Any modific i_ion to such zonai plan and usage must be tr l:en by strrcrly following the rules in place a nd in consideration of the larger public inter :,;t and the impact on the environment,,.

5. Since the prayer of petitioner in this writ petitr > r is to receive her applicati.r-r ,rnd release individual service cor rlcti.n ro trr. :r lo rc'rnc r.r tior-tcd Pr.opertv, this Court, without going r to the meri[s of the matter, dir-t:cts the respondents to receive thr lpplication of peLitioner- and release service conncction to the sub..rt properly of the petitroncr, subject to the petitioner compl. i-rg with the directions Court in Rajendra issuetl by the Hon'ble Supreme h 3 Kumar Barjatga's case (supra) and the statutory requirements prescribed by the local authorities

6. The Writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. / //TRUE COPY// SD/- C. DEEPIKA SI TANT REGIST ECTION OFFICER at, State Of

1. The Principal Secretary, Power and Energy Department S 2 3 4 Telang ana at Hyderabad The Ch airman and Managing Director, Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd', Telangana, Mint Compouhd, HYderaba d The Supenntending Engineer (oPeration), Southern Power Drstribution Company Ltd , of Telangana, Gachibowli Division, Hyderabad The Assistant Divrsional Eng ineer (Operational ), Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., of Telangana , Chandanagar Section , Gachibowli The Assis tant Engineer (OPe rational), Southern Powe r Drstnbution CompanY Ltd., Telang ana. Chandanagar Su b Section, Gachibowli The Co mmissioner, Greater Hyderabad MuniciPal Corporalion, Seriling a ru Pa llY Zo HYderabad. ? ;,i,;"bc;1o cp FoR ENERGy, High court for the srate of relangana at Hyderabad a b; cc to M/s NIKITA GoENKA Advocate [oPUQ u il; dc i; sRl r,r snre6i*nc REDDV, sc FoR TGSPDCL. Advocate [oPUC] io. o"" cc io SCr c MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, Advocate [oPUC] 11. Two CD CoPies IOUT'I 6 ne, To SA GJP .,,.-/'-: -,t-' 14 0r ml 'i...\ .:\ I HIGH COURT DATED:2310912025 ORDER WP.No.28937 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. I l3 l?r Iro

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments