✦ High Court of India · 07 Nov 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 07 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
07 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,050 words

Smt. Haji Begum @ Maleka Begum, Dlo: Late Qasim Shareef, Occ: Household H.No.4-1 1-59, lnside Dargah Mir Mahamood Qibla Aftapur, Ra.jendemagar, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND

7. The State of Telangana represented by its, Prl. Secretary, (Home) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. Asst Commissioner of Police, ffice of the Asst Commissioner of police, Rajendra Nagar, Cybarabad Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District Station House Officer, Rajendranagar Police Station, Qybarabad, Hyderabad Ranga Reddy District. Smt. Kanees Shareef, W/o: late Azam Shareef, House wife, H.No.4-1 1-157, lnside Dargah Hazaral lvlir Mohamood Aulia Attapur, Rajendemagar, Hyderabad. Naseem Shareef, W/o: late Azam Shareef, House wife, H.No.4-1 1-157, lnside Dargah Hazarat lrlir Mohamood Aulia Attapur, Rajendemagar, Hyderabad. Shahed Shareef , S/o: late Azam Shareef, Business, H. No. 4-11-1 57, lnside Dargah Hazarat Mir Mohamood Aulia Aftapur, Rajendemagar, Hyderabad Qasim shareef S/o late Azam Shareef, Business, H.l'lo. 4-1 1-157, lnside Dargah Hazarat Mir Mohamood Aulia Attapur, Rajendemagar, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Artrcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to declare the inaction of the Respondent police 1 to 3 in rendering police help in favour of Petrtioners and to preserve the agricultural Land bearing Sy.No. Sy.No.32B (4.2o).32st1(o0.08),330 (00.32),333/1(2ooo Sq.Yards),333/3 (03 24), 335/1(Ac.10.0O), 335/2 (07.14), situated at Aftapur Villa re, Rajender Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, covered by order dated 20l0t/2015 passed by this Honble court in W.P No. 2622312015 and W.P.M.F.No 3{066/2015 as being arbitrary, illegal and un-constitutional and consequently dirr:, t the Respondents 1 to 3 to render police proction forthwith to protect the agrir ultural Land bearing Sy:No. Sy.No.328 (4.2o),329/1(00.08), 330 (00.32), 333/1(2 )00 Sq.Yards), 333/3 (03.24), r335/1(Ac.10.00), 335/2 (07.14),situated at Attar rr Village, Rajender Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District in the interest of justicr: l.A. NO: 't OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 51737 0F 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci :umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma 7 be pleased to direct the Respondents 'l to 3 to render protection forthwith to t r )tect the agricultural Land bearing Sy. No. Sy.No.328 (4.20), 32911(00.08), 3:( (00.32), 333/1(2000 Sq.Yards), 333/3 (03.24), 335/1(Ac.10.00), 33512 (07.14) situated at Afrapur Village, Rajender Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District l.A. l{O: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 3007 oF 2016) Between: Syed Saleem, Son of Ahmed, aged 35 years, Occ: Business, lt/o: D.NO.13-6- 437110, Quader Bagh, Bahaduryarjung Colony, Near Pillar No 38, Hyderabad. AND 1. Smt. Haji Begum Maleka Begum, D/o: Late Qasim Str, reef, Occ: Household H.No. 4-11-59, lnside Dargah Mir Mahamood Qibla A apur, Rajendemagar, Hyderabad ....lmplead Petitioner (Propc : ed Respondent no.8) ...Resp,: rdent(Writ Petitioner)

2. The State of Telangana represented by its, Prl. Secretary Home) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. Asst Commissioner of Police., Office of the Asst Commisr;i rner of police, Rajendra Nagar, Cybarabad Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy D I trict

4. Station House Officer, Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyb: 'abad, Hyderabad Ranga Reddy District.

5. Smt. Kanees Shareef W/o late Azam Shareef, Aged aboL t 48 years, 6. Naseem Shareef, W/o: late Azam Shareef, aged about 41t parc,. 7. Shahed Shareef, S/o: late Azam Shareef, aged about 24 y >ars, 8. Qasim share6f, S/o: late Azam Shareef, aged about 20 yr: rrs, -All are Business, H.No.4-1 1-157, lnside Datgah ltuarat Mir Mohamood Aulia Attapur, Rajendemagar, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit the petitioner to implead as Respondent No. 8 in the Writ Petition 1n the interest of jubtice : Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. KIRANODYA KUMAR,REPRESENTING SRI M. RADHAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 7: M/S MEHERCHANDT'lORl Counsel for the Proposed Respondents: M/S R. K. CHITTA The Court made the following: ORDER THE HOII'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAI{ITI RAMAII RISHITA REDDY .WRIT PETTTION No. z1(X)78 of 20 1.5 ORDER,: This writ petition is filed seeking following 'elief: "To issue an order, writ or direction, more pa.rticularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus dectaring the inaction of respondent Nos.I to 3 in rendering police help in favour of petitioners and to preserve the agricultural land bearing Survey Nos.328 (4.201, 3291r (oo.O8), 330 (00.321, 333/ I (2OOo sq.yards), 333/3 (03.24), 33s/ 1 (Ac.1o.Oo), 335/2 (O7.L41, situated at Artapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District covered by order dated 20.08.2015 passed by this Court in W.p.No.26223 of 20lS and W.P.M.P.No.34066 of 2OI5 as i[egal, arbitrary and consequently direct respondert Nos.l to 3 to render police protection forthwith to protect the agricultural land bearing Survey Nos.328 (4.2O), 329/ l (00.081, 330 (00.32), 333/l (2000 sq.yards), 333/3 (c.3.241, 335/ I (Ac.10.OO), 33512 (OZ.t4), situated at Attapur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District." 2 2- When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P. Kiranodaya Kumar, learned counsel representing Mr. M. Radha Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that he has no instructions in the matter. It appears that petitioner is nowhere interested in pursuing the litigation and this Court has no other option except to dismiss the present writ petition for non-prosecution.

3. In the result, writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any in s, shall stand closed. -SD/-T. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, TJ BS

1. One CC to Sri M. Radhakrishna, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to M/s. Meherchand Nori, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Tno CCs to GP for Home , High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad {OU[

4. One CC to M/s. R. K. Chitta, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies (f HIGH COURT DATED:0711112025 1 ( [5 i:'--.- 2026 7- t srnr :l + ORDER WP.No.40078 of 2015 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOF] NON. PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS @Fel 4, ok'- *^l,lYott

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments