✦ High Court of India · 23 Sep 2025

Mrs. Damerla Bhavani v. '1 . The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 23 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
23 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,127 words

Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more parttcularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not receiving the application for electricity connections to the Petitioners property bearing Flat No. 201, in the building named as Sri Sai Dhamam vide built up area of '1600 Sq. Ft (out of total land admeasuring 200 Sq. Yds) in plot No. 1254 bearing H. No. 4-21-1254 in Sy. No. 78, situated at Venkatramana Colony, Gokul Plots, Hafeezpet Village, Serilingampally t\,4andal, Rangareddy District as illegal' arbitrary, unlust and consequently direct the respon application for the electricity connections and release required meters without any further delay ,. nts to receive the supply with lro power |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the r ':umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co r may be pleased to direct the Respondents to receive application of the Petitir ':r and release power supply with required meters to the petitioner property bear -'; Flat No 20f in the building named as Sri Sai Dhamam vide built up area of 1 100 sq. Ft (out of total land admeasuring 200 Sq. Yds) in plot No. 1254 bearing I No' 4-21-1254 in Sy' No. 78, situated at Venkatramana Colony, Gokul Plo,. Hafeezpet Village, Serilingampatly Mandal, Rangareddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s NIKITA GOENKA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : SRI N'SREEDHI'R REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI G-MADHUSUDHAI'.l REDDY The Court made the following ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAXA ORDER: W.P.No.28922 of 2o25 Pelilioner seeks a direction to respondents to receive her application and release service connection to her property bearing Flat No.2Ol, Sri Sai Dhamam, admeasuring 16O0 sq. ft (out of total land admeasuring 20O sq. yards) in plot No. 1254 bearing H.No.4- 2L-1254 in Sy.No.78 situated at Venkatramana Colony, Gokul Plots, Hafeezpet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioncr, learned Government Pleader for Enerry on behalf of Respondent No. 1, Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.5.

3. Ms. Nikita Goenka, learned counsel for petitioner submits that in similar circumstances, while dealing with Writ Petition No. 198O2 of 2025, this Court by order dt. lO.O7 .2025 directed the respondents authorities therein to release the service connection, and hence, requested this Court to pass similar order in this Writ Petition also. 2

4. Recentll,, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in )i eiendrq. Kumar BarJatga a. U.P. Aaas Ettam Vlkas Parishacl; , in the larger public interest, issued directions in addition the directives issued in Re: Directions in the matter of demoLit,. L of stntctures. Relevant for rhe purpose of this case are: "(iv) All the necessary service connections :uch as, Elcctriciry, water supply, sewerage c( reclion, etc., shall be given by the service p ':,vider / Board to the buildings only after the p r:duction of the completion / occupation certific t :. (u) Even after issuarce of completion c 'r lificzrte, deviation / violation if any contrar to [he planhing permission brought to the r )tice of the authority immediate steps be takr n by the said authority concerned, in accordz; -e with law, against the builder / owner / r ,:upant; and the official, who is responsible for : suance ol wrongful compietion / occupation r : -tificate shall be proceeded departmentally fortl v'ith. ("i) No permission / iicence to cond rr:t any business / lirade must be given :,y any authorities including local bodies ( States /Union Territories in any unar t rorised buikiing irrespective of it being resid, rrtial or commercial building. (vii) The development must be in conforn the zonal plan land usage. Any modifi such zonal plan and usage must be strictly following the rules in place consideration of the larger public inte the impact on the environment". ily u,ith il tion to : <en by liLnd in r:sl and

5. Since the prayer of petitioner in this writ petil ,.rn is ro receive her arpplication and release individual service colr(rcti()n Lo the aloreme n tiont:rl property, this Court, without going :Lto lhe me-'s I 2024 SCC Online sc 1767 of the matter, directs the respondents to receive the application of pctitioner and release service conncction to the subject property of the petitioner, subject to the petitioner complying with the directions issued by the Honble Supreme Court in RaJend.ra Kumar Barlatga's case (supra) and the statutory requirements prescribed by the local authorities.

6. The Writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. . I //TRUE COPY// SD/- C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G- SECTION OFFICER . The Principal Secretary, Power and Energy Department' Secretariat' State of Telangana at HYderabad. rne ciiirman dnd Managing Director, Southern Power Distribution company Ltd., of Telangana, Mint Compound, Hyderabad' it*" Srd"rrtJnd ino Engineei loperation l Southern .Power Distribution C"rpi[V liO., of T"elan-gana, Gachibowli Division' Hyderabad' ih; A;ri. Divisional En{ineer (Operational). Southern Power Distribution c"iipi"v Ltd., of Tetan"grna, Vaianthanagar section' Gachibowli' in" 6oniri.sibner, cre-atei ityderabad M-unicipal c^orporaJion. Hyderabad. . i*i, C-Ci t" Ci fOn ef.renCV, Hign Court for the State of Telangana at . o;;-ad 6 uvs tttklrR GoENKA, Advocate [oPUC] . o;; ac io SCrc.rvnonusuDHAN REDDY, Advoc^ate(oPUC) o;; ac io 5nr ru.snErDHAR REDDY' Advocate (oPUC) Hvderabad. [OUT]

0.Two CD CoPies To 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 o 1 SA GJP i,' '_ '-:- \ ()r.'\ i... 14 ,i1 ?025 \.. -">. \:\.- HIGH COURT DATED:2310912025 ORDER WP.No.28922 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments