High Court · 2025

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in lhe nature of Writ of [V]andamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.5 to 7 2 3 4 5 b 7 rn interfering rnto the peacefur enjoyment of V-R.c. Godown in the house premises No 9-'1 14l5, in survey Nos. 18g (part) and 1gl (part), which is situated at Pedda Amberpet Vi'age, Abdurapurmet .vlandar, Ranga Reddy District and trying to demorish the authorized V.R.c. Godown of the petitioner without issuing any notice and without forowing the due process of raw by coruding with the pubric representatives of the petitioner is iregar, arbitrary, un constitutiona r and violation of Articres 14' 15' 21 and 300-4 of constitutron of rndia and arso violation of principres of Naturar Justice consequenry direct the Respondent Nos.S to 7 not to interfere into the peaceful enjoyment of V.R_C. Godown of the Petitioners in the house premises No.9-.1 14l5, in Survey Nos..l89 (part) and 1g1 (Part), which rs situated at pedda Amberpet Village, Abdullapurmet Mandat, Ranga Reddy District and not to demorish the Godown without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law. lA NO: 1 o F 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.5 to 7 not to interfere into *re peacefur enjoyment of v R C' Godown of the petitioners in the house premises No.g-114l5, in survey Nos.1B9 (Part) & 191 (part), which is situated at pedda Amberpet Village, Abdurrapurmet Mandar' Ranga Reddy District and not to demorish the Godown without issuing any notice and without forowing the due process of raw pending disposal of the Writ petrtion. Counsel for the petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : Gp FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondents No.4&7 : Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.S : SRI M.RAVINDER REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALTY Counsel for the Respondents No.6 : Gp FOR IRRIGATION & CAD The Court made the following: ORDER **ry ,/ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WR.IT PETITION No.28895 6 2tJ25 t ORDER: The writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus lo declare the action of the respondents Nos.5 to 7 in interfering with the peaceful enjoyment of V.R.C. Godown in the house premises No.9-11415 in Sy.Nos.189 (Part) and 191 (Part) situated at Pedcia Amberpet Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and trying to demolish the authorized V.R.C. Godown of the petitioners without issuing any notice and without following the due process oi iaw by colluding wlth the public representatives as iilegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles t4, 15,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent Nos's to 7 not to intert'ere with the peaceful enjoyment of V.R.C. Godown ano not to demolish the Godown without issuing any notice.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Singiredr:y Ravinder Reddy, learned standing counsel for respondent No.5 - Municipality and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation and Command Area Development.

3. Learned standing counsel for the respondent No.5 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation and Command Area Development. submitted that the godown of the petitioner is q { ') '\ in house premises No.g-114/5, Sy.Nos.189 (part) and 191 (part) situated at Pedda Amberpet Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and is constructed in the FTL area of Chouta kunta Tank, Pedda Amberpet and as such, necessary action is being initiated ior removrng unauthorized construction.

4. In the circumstances, the respondents No.5 to 7 are directed not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners without following due process of raw. However, this order shafl not come in the way of the respondents No.5 to 7 in taking action against the petiticners bv giving prior notice, affording opportunity of hearing and pass orders, in accordar:ce with lay/. The writ petition is Miscellanecus petitions, if any l-here shali De no order as to costs. disposed of according ly. pending, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G. SECTION OFFICER State of Telanga na, Hyderabad.

1. The Principal Secretary, TMAUD Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, 2. The Commissioner, [\4unicipal Administration and Urban Development 3. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Telangana, Department (MAUD), Telangana, Hyderabad. Hyderabad.

4. The District Collector, Ranga Ranga Reddy District. 5. The I\4unicipality, Pedda Amberpet, Ranga Reddy District, Commissioner. 6. The Deputy fxecutive Engineer, lrrigation and CAD Department, Sub- 7. The Tahsildar, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District B, One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advodate. [OPUC] 9 Two CCs to GP FOR TMCPL ADTVIN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Division-1, lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District.

10.Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Telangana. [OUT] Hyderabad. [OUT]

11.Two CCs to GP FOR IRRIGATION & CAD, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

12.One CC to SRI M.RAVINDER REDDY, SC for Municipality, Pedda Amberpet. loPUCl '13 Two CD Copies. BSK BS -n}t.*-_ _.,**-r -.1&;-""'q'€r----.re:a:1---:-.v.-=-..:,.-.*fr*l,-.- -att*-- ''.'--{i,:}:g To, HIGH COURT DATED:2210912025 CC TODAY ORDER WP.No.28895 of 2025 ) i-i ,,., i.'i .\.: ' ./ ,), --.:: 2'l :ltP ,'r,l{5 C-: t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS /s /t l3 /?