The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crimlnal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Petitioner's Quash Petition; to quash the CC. No. 2565 of 2024. ...Respondents/Complainant l.A. NO: 2OF 2025 Between: Smt. Mandapati Soni, W/o M. An,iani, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Housewife, Fl/o. Flat No. G4, Kaikala Mahalaxmi Residency, Fl/o. Plot No. 32, Beside Sri Chaitanya School, Manikonda. ... Petitioner/Defacto Complainant AND

1. Mandapati Anjani Prakash, S/o M. Kanakarathnam, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Private employee, Ri/o. Flat No. G4, Kaikala Mahalaxmi Residency, R!/o. Plot No. 32, Beside Sri Chaitanya School, Manikonda. ... RespondenUPetitioner/Accused

2. The State Hyderabad of Telangana, Rep by Public Pros: ;utor, High Court at ...Res 1 onde nUCom plainant Petition under Section 3sg(2) of BNSS praying tha n the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition the High cou,t may be pleased to record the compromise basing upon the acco-r panyin! affidavit and consequently quash the cc. No. 2565 of 2024 which is perr ling on the file of the lx Additional Judiciat Magistrate of first class, Rang: Reddy District, at Kukatpally. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusinc he fvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing he arguments of Sri Marupaka Pranav Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner ;r d Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public prosecutor on behalf of the ::spondent No.1 and of Sri K. Raj Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA I.A.No.2 OF 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.'t2853 OF 2025 COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused seeking to quash the proceedings against him in C C No.2565 of 2024 on lie file of learned lX Additional Judicial [\4agistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally, registered for the offences under Section 85 of BNS and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. Heard Sri lvl. Pranav Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State and Sri K. Raj Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.2 3 lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner- accused as well as respondent No.2-cle facfo complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, LA.No.2 of 2025 has been filed by respondent No.2 seeking to record compromise and quash the proceedings in the present C.C

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petition 2 ETD,] 'rl I,.No 12851oI2025

5. Perused the affidavit filed by the de facir complainant l.A No.2 of 2025, which discloses that she has willit;ly consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter nto compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by ap::aring along with their respective counsel before the High Courl Legal Services Committee, yide order, dated 06.10.2025, passed by -ris Court 6 Pursuant to the above said direction issued i y this Court, the parties along wrth their respective counsel have ap: :ared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State c I Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Committee has id€ I tified the parties and submitted a report, dated 15 10.2025, stating thrr the parties were identified and they have wilfully and without any coe r ;ion entered into com p rom rse 7 ln view of the above, l.A.No.2 of 2025 is allowe c Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings r C.C.No.2565 of 2024 on the file of learned lX Additional Judicial l\1 lgistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally, agains the petitioner- accused are hereby quashed subject to the petitione r accused paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousa r I Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Fiyh Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five \ \ l ETD..I Crl P.No 12851 of202i Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates'Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry. lvliscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY/i SD/. T. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR El-/ SECTION OFFICER To, Kukatpally Kukatpally, Cyberabad

1. The lX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class, Ranga Reddy District at 2. The I Additional Junior civil Judge cum lX Additional Metropolitan tVlagistrate, 3 The Station House officer, wPS - tr coRRtDoR (cyberabad) potice station, 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at 5. One CC to Sri Marupaka Pranav Kumar, Advocate tOpUCI 6. One CC to Sri K. Raj Kumar, Advocate tOpUCl 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] Cyberabad ABK /SA Along with a copy of Joint Memo of Compromise Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand onry ) has been paid by Sri Marupaka Pranav Kumar, counsel for the petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble court vide order dated 27.1o.202s as Rs. s,0001 ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Secretary, High court Legal Services committee, High court for the State of relangana" and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates' Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 125599 olZO2S and Receipt No. 171 1 datedOT_11_2OZS. HIGH COURT DATED: 2711012025 ,i COMMON ORDER l.A.No.2 of 2025 ln/And CRLP.No.12853 of 2025 '1< ' o7 s l- 2 70n !i .J aI a * ALLOWING THE l.A.No.2 of 2025 AND THE CRIMINAL PETITION L0 \?" , BtrFORE THE HON'BL E HIGII CO URT FOR TIJD STATE OF TELANGANA A1'HYD ERABAD Crl. Pctition No ltx> oF 2025 Bet$,ecr.r: Mandapati Anjani Prakash S/o M. Kanakarathnam, Agcd about 5O ycars, Occ: privatc employce, R/o. Flat No. G4, Kaikala Mahalaxmi heiid.,-r.y, It/o. Plot No.32, Beside Sri Chaitanya School, Manikonda. ..PtrTrTrONtrR/ACCUSED AND i. 'l'ite State of 1'clangana, . Rcp by Public Prosectrtor c-o"U- C<.!1f :'de r abatl J 2. Srnt. Mandap:rti Soni W/o M. Anjanr, Agcd about 47 years, Occ: Houservifc, R/o. Irlat No. G4, Kaikala Mahalaxmi Rcsidency, Ri o. Plot No. 32, Besidc Sri Ch:ritanya School, Manikonda. "a,, ... RESPONDENl./ COMPLATNANT JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE Thc Par[ies to the present Crl.p. submit that Responclent No.2 is rnarricd to Petitioner happily and that she was a major according to her on thc datc of marriage, and that pctitio.cr is the father of hcr infant child. 'l'hc1'havc filed their respcctive affidavits along with a compromise perition, and prescntly, tlrc follorving Joint Memo is filed recording the following:

1. The Petitioner submits that, the present pctition is prefered by thc Petit.ioner herein to quash the proceedings against pe titioncr/ Accused in c.c. No. 2565 of 2024, on the file of IX Addl Judicial Magistrare of rrrsr- Class, Ranga Rcddy District, At Kukal_pally. The C.C. is registercd for the offcnce under Section 85 BNS & 4 of Dowry prohibition Act. ,^^F\ a XA- AYr n Sd"4 -..1 (

2. It is subrnitt<:cl that thc ntro,r" 3n-ptuint rvhic_ r'as thc basis of the Dc[acLo Conrpiair.t I .rt and pr:titioner arc LIsc. ,fhe afors111s111i6,,1,,cl C.C. rs la wtlc and husband. 3. It is sllbntittcd tlr:rt thc (iuc tc some cliffe rr: nc,,_r: I and )efzrcto Oomplrrin;rn[, tlrr:1, 21." husband a1d rr i r cornplaint is lalse. an.l latcr or_r Chargesheet 11;;1.; mcl'rtroned C Cl. rvhich u.ar rx Addl Judicrar r,,*,.;;"',:;;:":";:""1'_:::, KLr k ir I p.r ll-\ . clrvcr:r-r thc I)e trtioncr :urrl the zrbove saici llk:d in the ab61.s ti 2024 on the filc of jlcrld,y District, At

4. IL is suirrnitte(l rltat thc Delacto Complain:r,t, .1.:cl pe tioner are hapPrJ-v Lvi.;1 r,gcthcr ;r.d ha'c arnicabll, settled th(,i- cliff<,rcncr:s and the abovc mentiorrr.cl C.C scrves no l)u1-posc as both the _ 3facto Complainant artd i\ccuscd ltar.c rcsolved thcir rlificrcnccs ar (.rCtl' CS ,lIt(j l.esidinp. logol l1g1 napnrl! arrd rlr p,,litr,)irot- is rr.lvine ltl),,t) tlle ftr11,,,r r r ; turlqmerrts nf lhe _ ,i,,,, , , 1794 oJ 2O1S) & Jttcndra Raghuuanuashi And fthers V, Bo.bito. Raghuuanuasht And others ( Crintinal Appeal No. 44? of 2O7S ). 'fhe partir:s h:rvi: filed tltcir rcspcctive alll<l;r,.; s, along with a 5. com])r orn isc pcl lro1, sliy .* happirv n,:; :ied and rravc ar.r minor crrld roscrrrer t,.,,,:l:: ,:;:.,t::l Iror thc a bor.es tateci I'iH"::::*lJI.:;$i::ir:,.,"-J*1I^1:::r':",T#:; ga ii cidy District, At Kukatpary, basing upon the present.loint Memo. HYDI'IiABAI) DArE: /Q-oozozs PtrTI1]ONER r-lt J;'"t RF I 'ONDENT No. 2 ,\^ -,^r? tCl n-n rt r\ ^