High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of l\rrandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction ...RESPONDENTS (a) declaring the rejec;tion Apprication for passbook Data correctio n 2500044584 by the co'ector and District tulagistrate, siddipet District (rvedak), Terangana State as illegal and arbitrary (b) declaring the land of an extent of Ac..10-00 in Sy Nos.127i26, Ac.1_.19 guntas in Sy- No.127l3 0r E,andamairaran Vrrage, Murugu Mandar, siddipet District (Medak) is a private patta rand and that incrusion of the said rands in the rist of prohibited properties under Section 22-A of the Registration Act as iilegar, arbitrary, contrary t. the provisions of the Registration Act and viorative of Articre 300-4 of the Constituti,:n of lndia (c) consequenfly direct the respondents to derete the said rand of an extent of Ac. 10-00 in Sy l:,os.127126 and Ac.1_19 guntas in Sy No..127l3 of Bandamailaran Village [\,4ulugu lvlandal, Siddipet District (Medak) from the tist of prohibited properties. lA NO: 1 oF 2025 Petition under sr:ction 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in stupport of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the responderts herein to permit the petitioners to construct building/godown in their property of an extent of Ac.10-00 in Sy Nos.l27 /26, Ac. 1-19 guntas in sy No 1 27 r3 0f Bandamairaran Virage. [vurugu I\,4andar, Siddipet District (Medak); penrJing disposar of the above wnt petition Counsel for the petitioner: SRI p.BALAJI VARMA counsel for the Respondents: sRr L.RAVTNDER, AGp FoR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER TITIi IIONOT]RABI,E SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHi\TAN WRt'l'PETITION No.28845 of 2025 ORAL ORDER: I Ieard lcamcd counsel for the petitioners and Mr. L.Ravincler'. learr.red Assistant Govemment Pleader lor Revenue appearing firr the respondents

2. 'l'he I'etitioncrs hcrcin are clain.ring that they ale the absolute owners ancl possessors o f thc land admeasuring Ac. I 0-00 gts in Sy.No.l2712 (old No.l2716\, Ac.l-13 gts Sv.No. 127l-i and Ac.0-06 gts in Sy.No. l21l3E, total land admeasuring Ac. I l- l9 gts, situated at Bandamailararn Village, Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District. They have pulchased the subject property from freedom fighters

3. Referring to G.O.Ms.No. I I l0 dated 24.05.1960 and G.O.Ms.No.4i8 dated 24.03.1964, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that h'eedom lighters are entitled to alienate the property after completion of [0 years of assignment. Accordingly, they have alienated the subject property in favour of petitioners, on cornplction ol I0 yeals of assignment. Even then, the subject property is urentioned in the list of prohibited 2 v properties. 't'herefbre, petitioncrs herein havc subrnitted online application l\o.2500044584, to the respondent No..l with a request to delete l.he subject propcrty fi'onr thc list of prol'ribited propcrties. He has re.rectcd the sarre,"r,ith ottc u'orcl "Rejectcd",

4. Pe rus;tl ol the said rc-iection order wotrld reveal that respondent \o.3 has re.iectcd the request made by the petitioner with one wc,rd "Rejected". It is not a l'easonecl older. No reasons were assigned Any order passed without reasons is an order passed without application of nrind and it is norl-est. Theretbre, the irnpugned rejection order is liable to bc sct asicle.

5. In vi<:w of the albrcsaicl cliscussions, rvitlrout going into merits and dernerits of the casc. this Writ I']etitiotr is disposed of, setting aside the impugned rc.jcction order and the matter is remanded brlck to thc 3''r t'esponclcnt with a dircction to consider the aforesairl online applicatron No.2500044-584 subrnitted by the petitioneL uith a specific requcst to deletc thc subject properly frorn t['re list of prohibited plope rlies aud pass apltropriate orders strictly in ac:cordance with lar,r, alicsh, by putting the petitioner on notice and alfording hinr an opportunity. Respotrdent No.3 shall consider 1l-rc aloresaid two (l.O's and also convct'sion proceedings dated I5.r')6.1992 of respondent No.5. IIc sliall also considcr the 3 order dated 08 10.2023 in W.P.No.4l295 of 2017 of this Court in respect of thc samc village. I{owever, he shall cornplete the said exercise within a pcriocl ol60 days fi-orn thc date of receipt of copy of this order. Therc shall bc no ordcr as to costs. As a sequel, rniscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/- C. DEEPIKA S TANT REGI SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Se of Telangana tariat, Hyderabad, State

2. The chief commissioner of Land Administration, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad. \

3. The collector and District trilagistrate, Siddipet District (Medak), Telangana State.

4. The Revenue Divisional officer, Gajwel, siddipet District (Medak), Telangana State.

5. The Tahsildar, tr/ulugu Mandal, Siddipet District, Telangana State' 6. One CC to SRI P.BALAJI VARI!{A' Advocate [OPUC] T.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT]

8. Two CD CoPies BSR GJP L. HIGH COURT DATED:2310912025 ORDER WP.No.28845 of 2025 1I nH :i:ii ii ..-) t,r) -.,. t. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS od K \