1, Ir/ulakalapalli Surendra Chari v. 1. State of Telangana

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No.3 and 4 in calling the Petitioner to the Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda at the instance of the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 and forcing the petitioner to settle the financial issues of third parties and the respondent no.5 and 6 is as illegal, arbitrary and against to Law and consequently direct the respondent No.3 and 4 not to insist the petitioner to attend before the Uppal Police Station, Rachakonda without there being any complaint registered against the petitioner at the instance of respondent Nos.S and 6. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the citr Jmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nr ty be pleased direct the respondent No. 3 and 4 not to call the Petitioner to the ( ppal Police Station, Rachakonda without there being any complaint registered a Tainst the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. G ESWARAIAH Counsel forthe Respondent No. 1 to 4: SRI G. ANIKETH RE )DY, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No. 5 to 6: -- The Court made the following: ORDER .1 I i I + t I j I i , I t J .t i ; t t i THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.28748 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri G Aniketh Reddy' learnecl Assistant Government Pleader for Homc appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at thc aimissiorr stage itself' -

2.Thiswritpetitionhasbeenfiledseekingthefollowingprayer:- "to declare the nction of the respontlenf No3 and 4 in calling tlu Petitioner to the Uppal bolice Station' Rnchttkondn nt the instance of tlrc resporulent Nos'S nnrl 6 and fotcing the petitioner to settle the 'n'.,ir"riLi issues of third pnrties nid the-retp'ndcn.t no'S and 6 is as 'i)i'"g*i,- nii,r:,rry'antl against to Lato antl consequently -dtrect 'rrr)i"rar"t Noi nnd 4 itot to insist the pctitioner.to attend before tlrc t Innnl Polire Station' Rnchakonda toithutt tlrcre being any complaint. i:;i';,;,1';;"i,;;;'i"' piit-"* 't the instance of respondent Nos'S antt 6." 3. Brief facts in this writ Petition as stated are that the petitioners apart from their private jobs are doing small real estate business and eking out their livety hood. It is submitted that through mutual friends' petitioners got to know about one Sri C S Iteddy The case of the petitioners is that on 18 09 2025 at about 5 PM, respondent Nos 5 and 6 came to the petitioners' office and have taken petitioner No 2 with therr' Hence' petitioner No 1 dialed 100 and lodged a complaint Further case of the petitioners is that on 19 09 '2025 ' respondent No.3 calted the petitioners and demanded to pay some amount to respondent Nos.5 and 6 and enquired the whereabouts of Sri C S Reddy' Thereafter, respondent authorities wcre halassing the petitioners by calling him to the policc station and insisting them to pay amount to respondent Nos.5 and 6. Aggricved by the same' this writ petition is filed , I I I I l ---..*{ .i- \. F+H t\

4. Learncd Assistant Gor,'crnrnent Pleadcr for F[, mc appcarirriJ for 2 respondent Nos.1 to 4 placed on rcco;'ci irstructions is:ri cl by Sub-Inspestor of Police, Uppal I'olice Station, iiacFakonda Commissio: erate, rarherein it is stated that on 18.09.2025 at27.30, petitioner No.1 gavc a ( ( mplaint stating ihat respondent No.5 and other have thlcatened then ar J has taken arvay petitioncr No.2 frorn Chai Dunia, situatcd in Uppal 3hagayat. On such complaint, GD cntry was madc and at 21.40 houls, rctitioner No.1 has withdrawn his cornplaint stating that petitioner No.2 I ad came back and undertaking to that effect was also givcn by petitiorrt:r No.1. It is further submitted that rcspondcnt Nos.5 ancl 6 l.ravc not madc ar i, complaint agailrt petitioners, hencc, thc question of calling the petition.:t o the police staLion and harassing tl.rem c{oes not arisc

5. Recording thc subrnissions rnadc by learncd c,) rnsel appearing on either side, without cxpressing any opinion on the meritr; rf thc casc, this writ petition is disposcd of directing the respondent autho ities to follow due proceclure as contemplated undcr law before initrat ng any action on petitioners

6. With thc abovc direction, this writ petitior 1S disposed of Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand c ( sed. No order as to i t SD/- B. REKHA RANI SI;TANT REGISTRATT ----.-- //TRUE COPY// \ sEcTroN oFFtcER To, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. '1 . The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretar at, Saifabad, 2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissiorrr rate. 3. The Station House Officer, Uppal Police Station, Uppal, Rachakonda. 4. The Sub-inceptor of Police, Uppal Police Station, Uppal Rachakonda V c ? 1.o) c I 9n" cc to SRI G. ESWARataTJ an.,^^^.^ [6,fi t.: ffi f B:?f E :. iWI 55i:r:: ? "'-' MMT GJP jPn: t?] te o r re r a n g a n a ro U rl HIGH COURT DATED:2210912025 I I \ ORDER WP.No.28748 of 2025 ,,', . i ',:r i i:l: W ):., '+ 1 DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITON WITHOUT COSTS \t 19 lrI