High Court · 2025

Gullapalli Sridhar, son of late Sri G.Satyanarayana, Aged about 51 yearb, Occupation Business, resident Of 361/SRT, S.R.Nagar, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND 1- State of Telangana, Represented by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. 3. Station House Officer, Sanje,eva Reddy Nagar Police Station, S.R. Nagar, Hyderabad.

4. Lt.Col.Gullapalli Kutumba Rao, son of late G.Satyananyana, aged about 56 years, Occupation Retd. Army, resident of 8-36, Vea Vihar, AWHO Colony, Trimulgherry, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cot-rrt may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction, preferably a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial respondent in respect of property bearing House No.361/L3, M.C.H.No.7-1-6211377, admeasuring 166.6€ sq. yards consisting of ground floor 125O sft. and first floor 1250 sft. total measuring 2500 sq. feet situated at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad, as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia by setting aside the said action and pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, direct the Respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere with the' disputes between Petitioner and Respondent No.4 being civil in nature in respect of the property bearing House No.361/L3, M.c.H.No.z-1-6211371, admeasuring 166.66 sq. yards consisting of ground floor 1250 sft. and first floor 1250 sft. total measuring 2500 sq. feet situated at sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 1 0F:2017(WpMp. NO: 14247 0F 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 1 to 3 not to interfere with the disputes between Petitioner and Respondent No.4 being civil in nature in respect of the property bearing House No.361/L3, M.C.H.No .7-1-G21|3TT, admeasuring 166.66 sq. yards consisting of ground floor 1250 sft. and firstfloor 1250, sft. total measuring 2500 sq. feet situatrld at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Writ Pel.ition. l.A. NO: 2 OF 1!017(WPMP. NO: 31068 OF 2017) Between: Lt.col.G.rllapalli Ku!_umba Rao, son gf late G.satyanarayana, aged about 56 ye.ars, c,ccupqtion Rgtd..Arpy, resident of 8-36,-vea vihar, AWHO colony, Trim ulgl' erry, Secunderabad. ...PETITIONER AND

1. Gullapalli Sridhar, son of late _s-ri ^g.gqtyaqarayana, Aged about 51 years, 2. State ol relangana,..Represented by its secretary, Home Department, Occupat on Business, resident Of 361/SRT, S.R.Nagar, tTyderabad. Secretar at Buildings, Hyderabad. 3. Commisr;ioner of Police, Hyderabad. 4. station llouse officer, sanjeeva Reddy Nagar police Station, s.R. Nagar, Hyderab;ad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the offir:ial respondent authorities to remove the petitioner from the premises hearing House No. 361/L3, M.c.H. No.7-1 -621t371 admeasuring 166.66 sq. yarcls consisting of ground floor 1250 sft. and first floor 1250 sft.. total measuring 2500 sq. feet situated at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad by registering a case against the petitioner herein and to dismiss the writ petition. COUNSCI fOr thE PCtitiONET: MS. P.KRISHNA KEERTANA' REP.,FOR SRI CH.SIDDHARTHA SARMA counset for the Respondent No.l to 3: SRI R.LN(MIKANTH REDDY' AGP FOR HOME counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI The Court made the following: ORDER { THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No. {1451 oF 2017 OR This Writ Petition is filed under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia seeking lhe following relief: "...fo r'ssue any appropriate Writ, Oder or direction, preferably a Wit in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the officiat respondents in inbrtering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial rcspondent in respect of prcpefi beaing House No. 361/t-3, M.C.H. No.7-1-621R77, admeasuring 166.66 :;q.yards consisting of ground floor 1250 sft. and first floor 1250 sft. total measuring 2500 sq. feet situated at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad, as being illegal, abitnry and viotative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia by sefting aside the said action and pending drbposa/ of the above Writ petition, direct the Respondents I to 3 not to inteiere with the disputes between Petitioner and Respondent No-4 being civil in nature in respect of the propedy bearing House No. 361/L3, M.C.H. No.7-1-621871, admeasuring 166.66 sq. yards consisting of ground floor 1250 sft. and firsi floor 1250 sft. total measuring 2500 sq. feet, situated at Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad, and fo pass such other order or fufther orders..."

2. I have: heard Ms. P. Krishna Keertana, learned counsel, representing Mr.ch.siddha(ha Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. Larxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government preader for Home, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this petition has been filed contending that the respondents/Police authorities were interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondent in respect of house property and this Court considering the merits had passed an interim order on 31.03.2017 directing the Police not to interfere with the civil matters and liberty was given to the petitioner to approach the D.C.P. concerned to bring it to his notice, and that order had substantially redressed the grievance of the petitioner.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the respondents/Police never interfering with the personal life or private affairs of the petitioner as contested.

5. I have perused the material on record.

6. Having regard to the submission that the interim order granted by this Court had redressed the grievance of the petitioner, making the interim order absolute disposing of this petition is found appropriate. Accordingly, the respondents/Police authorities are directed to restrain from interference with the civil matters of the petitioner, life and liberty of the petitioner, save and except, strictly in accordance with law' J

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings Telangana.

2. The Commissioner of police, Hyderabad. II TI II , State of The Str:tion House Officer, Sanieeva Reddy Nagar police Station, S.R. Nagar, Hyderarbad. One Crl to SRI CH.STDDHARTHA SARMA, Advocate tOpUCl One C,3 to SRI VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI, Advocate tOpUCI Two C:Cs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies

5. o.

7. BSR BM NT HIGH COURT DATED:2610812025 3 E WP.No.11451 o12017 ir '(HE S .J ? ? JAll 2026 o() * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ($' "t',\l'. L.