1. Kamal Prasad v. Mahant Sanjay Das

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI VEMPATI MALLIKARJUN SHASTRY The Court made the following: ORDER Ttre Hon'ble Smr. Iustrce Renuka'l _un Civil Revision Petition No.3321 of 2024 Ordc r: l hc (.ivil Rcvisron Pctition is hted bv the peurioners/Ll{s asstievecl b), thc orclcr passccl in l.r\.No.615 ol 2()24 ir: I.i\.No.607 ol 20llin().S.No.l.\t-{,,i2()17..1"r".1 tl.].09.21121 bvt['rt -L\ fr.rnior(-ir.il ILrclgc. (-itr' ( -ivil (-or.rrr, I lr'.lcrrllltl 2 Hceld Sti \lol'rcl. \cLran. lcarned corurscl ftrr thc rcr-isior.t pctitror'rcrs/plainriifl ;rrrrl Sri Vcnrpati N'{allikarjur-r Shestrl', lcarnctl cr.ru rr sc I [or rcsp<,nclclrt/clcfcncllnt 3 tnitialh, rhc rlcccrscd pcutioncr No.1 filcd suit irr ( ).S.\o.1,31+ ()f -llllt st cliinu pcrpcrLral in junctron rilarnst thc solc rcsl-ronclcnt s irh rcspccr to rhc propcrw consisting l I opcn plot o[ lancl s'ith srnrll h()uscs uclrnclstrrin.g 152 sq.vcls., bcari l1 NI(lFI No.14- 9-611 situatccl xt -l unr('r'aI Ilazrrr'. [ [vderabad. 'I'l c ca:ie of thc I)eriu()nc.rs is that rirc cit ccascri l)!'rtLi()ncr No..1 sras tltc orvner ancl p()sscssor of thc suit schr:clrrlc I)r()r)crtv arrd t>ut oI sai<l pr()Pern', 2i s11.vds. u ls lct orrl to thirr-l perrit s. \\'hc'rr tl-re tcl llrtrs cot'ntnirtcrl __.aa.i \ -- 2 dcfault, suit for evic[on has becn filcd and tenaflts failecl to comPlv rvith thc cvrcrion orclcrs. 'l'hc pcurioncrs filccl rvrit pctitiorr a|rd thc same was alk.rrved. whcn thc resp<tndcnt madc an xtrcmPt t, r intcrtcrt' rvith thc posscssion r>[ thc dcceascci pcutiiiner o\-cr the surt schcdr-rlc propcrw, a policc complainr was sought to bc givcn and rvhen thc same \vas re fuscd, thc suit fcrr pe rpctual ln juncuon wls filcd ] n seicl suit, L,\.No.6 0l of 2Ol1 was filcd sceking tcmP()rary iniunction Saitl pctition $,as e <xr,ed qrant1ng rurnporan iniuncu<tn r.iclc orclcr datccl

06.11.2023.'lhcrcaftcr, LA.No.6l5 c,f 2024 rvas filccl sccking poli<.c aid for inlplcmcnring thc orde rs in I.;\.No.607 <tf 201 r-.1-loNcvcr, seirl I.A has bccn dismisscd at-rd thcrcftrre, the Prescnt revision is filecl' 1 \ pctusal oi impugocd ordcr shows that thc pcriti"ncrs hercin arc claiming to bc in pt.rsscssion oF thc suit scl-redule proPcrn' and thc s,Inlc rs rcfutcd bt thc rcspondent. l'hc rcspr>nclcnt claimctl that thcre is no thrcat ol disposscssion bv him. Flaving considcrccl the rir.al contcntions, rhc lcarnecl -I'rial Court hcld that thcrc is n.) str()ns er.idence to provc tl-urt thc tespondent is violating the order and thltt tlrere is intmcdiate risk oI cLsposscssion. trurthcr obscn,ation is tnirtlc 3 about grving policc complaint an<l pohce not taking :Ln',' ?rction 2s thc rrlttcr is civil ir-r rrlturc. 'l'he situ:ttior.r according to :l-c lt::trncd 'I'rial ( -ourt shorvs tlrat thct'c is no nccrl oi urgcrtt policc lLctir,,'t, as such, dismtsscd thc pe tition. .'\ugrier ccl br the samc, the P-(scrtt rcviston ts prclcrrcd ()n thc grourtd that tlrc lcarnccl 'l'rial Court llessed thc irnpuorrccl orclc'r or crlooking tlrc scttlcd propositi'r r ol- larv that granting c-,f polrcc aid is rtot a lhr our t() thc Pctitl()nt'r Lrut rt bounden clufi' to implctncnt tl'rc tct-n1 )( )re r\ irriLrnctron ordcr in rr: rruc lcttcr and spirit. r\ s such, irrrvcrl tlrer thc itt'tptrgnccl orclcr be set esirlc -5 l'hc rccord shos,s thar l suit in O.S.No.lfl l-1 ol- 2011 for pcrpctual injur-rction rvas l'ilcd alorrs r.''ith I.A.No.60l r.[ 2()17 sccking tcmpor2rr\ iniurrction. 'l hc lcarnccl 'l'rral (-ourt has allc t'ccl thc petition scclong tclnp()rata' inittnctron a[tcr hcrrrLng both panics arlcl marking l')xs.l)1 to l){. ()nlv rvhcn thc 'I riel (-t-,urt conclud:tl thrtr therc is Prtma facic casc. balancc of c<,ruvcrricrrcc and irrc;,erablt, krss, thc tcmPoran' llllLrrlcLt()n w1ls grantccl. ( )ncc tctnprtrafl ilrlurrctlon vas grantcd th:rt too aftcr considcring tncrits of rhc casc brirh tht: Parties, it is bount-lcn rlutr ot- thc (,ourt tt.r intple rncnt thc sarnc i t casc oi Furtl-rcr 4 'I interference. 'l'he finding o[ rhc lcarncd 'l'ria1 Court that thcrc was an occasion [<rr thc rcr-ision petrtroncrs t() approach thc police ft>r gl.rng complaint against the attemprs ro clisposscss thcrn, that too during (lourt vacati<>n, thcrc is a need t() grenr policc aid. 'I'l-rc policc rvhen thc revision pctrtioners apprcachcd clrectly have dcclincd to take complainr ()n thc ground rhar thc dispr.rrc is cir,il in naturc. If s<_r, rvhen the peuuoncrs approachetl rhc (.orrrt lirr irnplcrncn tation of rhe temporary injunction orclcr granrccl in I..\.No.607 (\f 201,7, thcrc is a neecl to grant thc samc 6 T'hc contcntions of thc lcarncd counscl for respondcnt that temporary rn jtrnctron rvas obrainccl rn I.A.No.601 oF 2011 I:y misleading thc (-ourt, that rhc pctlti()ners zrc not in posscssion ancl that the rcspondents never triccl to intcrlcre s,rth drcir possession and that thcre is no thrcat oi disposscssion arc all contradrcdng thc version presented by thc rcr.isr<)n pcriri()ncrs hcrcio. l'he vcry fact oI thc petitioncrs approacl-ring rhe policc shorvs that thcrc is s()me c\rcnr rvhich warrantcd actlon ()n the part r>f the policc tc, prutcct pr)sscssi( )n .f the petiti.ncrs. \\'hen rhcrc is thrcat ,f iolauon r.rI thc tcrnpr.tarr f, injunct-ton grantcd bv the Court, rvhcrcin, therc is t :ituation of the partles approachinq thc pohce, thc nccd ftrr gratrt of rlllict'aid can bc cxaminccl..\s srrch. tl-rc impugnccl ortlct is liable to I>c strt astcle 1 Accorrlirrglr,, the (.ivil Ilcvision Pctition r. rllovicd sctdng asiclc the impugrrccl order passcd in l.r\.No.615 ol20 l-l in l-A-No.607 of 2011 in (),S No. 1fJ1-1 ol 2017. tlarcd ()-1.(19.2( )24 hi thc \X Junior (.ivrl .f udgc, (.Lrr (-ivil (-ourt, I lrtlcrabad. Consctltr,. rrtlt', tl-re said I.,\.No.615 ctl 2021 is ellou'cd. No c()sts Pcnclirrrr tnisceliancous pcriti()rts, iI l, rr . slrall stand close d To, SD/. G.JYOTHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY//

1. The XX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court' at Hydrrabad' 2. One CC to SRl. Ir/IOHAMMAD ADNAN Advocate [OPUCI 3. One CC to SRI VEMPATI MALLIKARJUN SHASTRY I'dvocate IOPUC] 4 Two CD Copies TPK/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:2311012025 ORDER CRP.No.3321 ot 2024 ( o IH: s f4 i.( ( o o 21 iloU lS, ( z aI t Or: \ ,sn,r rC$ EO * CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS ALI.OWED fi b^- \'t