The High Court · 2025

Gera Amrutha, Wo. G. Narsing Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ . Housewife, Wo.1A-7-8461147, Gowlipura, Mahakali Chicken Center, Gowlipura, Mekalamandi, Near Charminar Old City, Near Lal Dawaza, Aliabad Et Uppuguda, Hyderabad. Kondakala Kalamma, Wo. Sriramulu, Aged Et Occ not known to the Petitioner, R!to. Bakaram Village, Near Shivalayam Temple, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

10. Muthyalu, W/o. Madhu, Aged not known to the Petit < rer, Occ. Housewife, R/o., H.No. L4andal Ward No-17 of the GHtvlC, Chr npapet Village, Near Daggads Point, Hyderabad. ..RESPONDENTS petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of Inrii circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particula-l Writ of Mandamus, declaring the actron of the Unofficial trying to mutate their names or any third party names into t l praying that in the High Court may be r one in the nature of Rescondents herein re Revenue Records in respect of share of the Petitioneis Agriculture Land admr:; su ring Ac. 2-02 Gts., in Sy.No. 375 and 456/A,4 situated at Vattinagu lapally Villar e, Gand ipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as illegal and arbitrary action and ( direction, directing the Respondent No.4 nol appl cation/rep res en tation lor mutation of any third party n ] Records in the said Petitioner's Agriculture Land admeasur Sy.No.375 and 456/,4,4 situated at Vattinagulapally Villa,y Ranga Reddy District and further direct the Official R: consider the Petitioner Representation Dt. 1O.03.2O2a Respondents No.2 to 4 requesting the said Respondents f name into the Revenue Records of the Petitioner shi admeasuring Ac.2-O2 Gts., in Sy.No.375 and 456/44 situa:r cnsequently issue a .o entertain any ne into the Revenue ng Ac. 2-02 Gts., in :, Gandrpet l\,4andal, ;pondents herein to submrtted to the )r not to mutate any 'e Agriculture Land d at Vattinagulapally Village, Gandipet N4andal, Ranga Reddy Distflct forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section '15'1 CPC praying that in the c r )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour may be pleased to grant lnterim Direction, directing the Registering Authorit,r i.e- Sth Respondent herein not to entertain any documents submitted by the Lr cfficial Respondents herein for mutation of names into the Revenue Records with regard to the Petitioner share Agriculture Land admeasuring Ac.2-02 Ct ;., in Sy.No.375 and 456/4,4 situated at Vattinagulapally Village, Gandipet IV1€ 1dal. Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of ustice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKAT PRASAD UKKALAM Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. RAV|NDER, AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE IC LAK I I{MAN WRIT PETITION No.28901 of 202!i oRAL ORDER: Heard learned counsel for thc petitioner and l\l . L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government l'leader for Revenue ap1 earing for the respondents.

2. According to the petitioner, his father, late DrLr ari Sailu was the absolutc os,ner and possessor of land admeasurinp \c.2-02 gts in Sy.Nos.375iE,l: and 456/.44., situated at Vattinaguia ;atl1, Village, Gandipet Mandal, Itangareddy District. Petitioner lr s filed a suit vidE O.S.No 633 of 2022 against his father and re; rondent No.6, seeking perrnanent injunction. The said suit is pendir

1. During the pendency of the said suit, respondent Nos.6 to 10, l i r brothers and sisters are fi]'ing to obtain mutation proceedings in res rect of subject property rvithout putting the petitioner on notic: and without affording him an oppoftunity. ln paragraph No.6 of tl t writ affidavit, petitioner has specifically stated that the subject prr rerty is orally partitioned by his father. Therefore, petitioner ha representation dated 10.03.2025 to respondent Nos. request not to entertain any application submitted ; submitted a Ito4witha ry respondent Nos.6 to l0 for mutation of the subj ect property. Iherefore, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. 2 3 Though the petitioner is contending that he has submifted the aforesaid representation to respondent Nos.2 to 4, he has not fited proof of service of the said representation on the respondent Nos.2 to 4. Without filing proof of service, he cannot file the present writ petition alleging non-consideration of the said representation. Therefore, petitioner herein is not entitled for ariy relief much less relief sought in the present writ petition. This writ petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly, it is dismissed. However, liberry is granted to petitioner to submit online application to respondent Nos.2 to 5, with a requcst not to entertain any application submittcd by respondent Nos.6 to 10, seeking succession, mutation proceedings and issuance of E-Pattadar passbook in respect of subject property without putting the petitioner on notice and without affording him an opportunity and it is for the respondent Nos.2 to 5, to consider the same and dispose it of in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed' swAMY SISTANT REGISTRAR 'd/-K'BHA,ANI //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 2 4 One CC to SRl. VENKAT PRASAD UKKALAM Advo One CC to SRI L. RAVINDER, Advocate [OPUC] loPUCl TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE'HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana Two CD CoPies PVL (Y PMK - - =;;.S HIGH COURT DATED:2310912025 ORDER WP.No.28901 ot 2025 -\ r1[iC ffi i t1

1..t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS *{d+ &*