The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of rhe constitutron of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the actron of the Respondent Nos.5 to 7 in interfering into the peaceful enJoyment of V.R.c convention in the. house premises No.7-1771187, in Survey Nos.184, 185 and 187 (part), which is situated at Pedda Amberpet Village, Abdullapurmet lvlandal, Rpnga Reddy District and trying to demolish the authorized v.R.c. convention of the petitioner without issuing any notice and without fcilowing the due process of law is illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 300-A of constitution of lndia and also violation of Principles of Natural Justrce consequen y direct the Respondent Nos.5 to 7 not to interfere into the peaceful enjoyment of V R'C convention Functional Hall of the Petitioner in the house premises No.7 177 /187 , rn Survey Nos.184, 185 and 187 (Part), which is situated at Pedda Amberpet Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distrrct and not to demolish the Functional Hall wrthout issuing any notice and without following the due process of law IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.5 to 7 not to interfere into the peaceful enjoyment of V R.C Convention Functional Hall of the Petitioner in the house premises No.7- 1771187 in Survey Nos.184, 185 and 187 (Part), which is situated at Pedda Amberpet Village, Abdullapurmet IVlandal, Ranga Reddy District and not to demolish the Functlon Hall without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petitton Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRt G. MADHUSUDAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI SINGIREDDY RAVINDER REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the Respondent No.6: AGP FOR IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4&7: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER I Y THE HONOT]RABLE SRI JUSTTCE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITTON No.28708 OF 2025 ORDER: (ORAL) This writ petitioner is fited by ttre petitioner seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.5 to 7 in trying to interfere with peaceful possession and enjol'rnent of the petitioner over the subjcct propefty i.e., V.R.C. Convention in premises bealing No 7- 177l187 in Survey Nos.184, 185 and 187 (Part) situated at Pedda Arnberpet Vitlage' Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distrrct, and also trying to demolish the same, without following due process ol law, as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Artictes t4, 15, 2t and 300A of the Constitution of India.

2. Heard Mr. Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counscl lor the petitioner' Mr. Singiniddy Ravinder Reddy, learned standing counsel for respondentNo.5-MunicipalityandleamedAssistantGovernment Pleader for Irrigation and Command Area Development for respondent I I No.6.

3. Learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Irrigation and CommandAreaDevelopmentproducedwritteninstructionsand e ( ' submiued that the srructures raised by th" p"ti;;:o.t'ilii",ii,ni, ,rr" Full Tank Level ofChouta Kunta Tank in Survey Nos.144, lg4, lg5, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, l9l and l9Z of pedda Amberpet Village, o,.p. No.28708 of2o25 Abdullapurnict Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and as such, necessary action rs bcing initiateci lor removing unauthorized constrrelron.

4. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed ot, directing respondent Nos.5 to 7 not to interfere with the possession ol the petitioner ove r the subject properly i.e., V.R.C. Convcntion bearing. prcrnises No.1-1771181 in Survey Nos. lg4, lg5 and lg7 (part) situared at Pcdda Ambcrpet Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Rcddy District, without following due process of law- However. this order shall not come in the way of the respondent Nos.5 to 7 in taking action against the petitioner by giving prior notice, affording opportunity ot hearing and pass orders, in accordance with law. No order as to costs As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in tlre ivrit petilion stand cl osed SD/.A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR a I SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, , I[" ,3J:?:[i!,1ff!?H"orvrA and uD Department, secretariar Buirdins. : 6!i,ffs,?ii,.o.l;!,x,ltJB?1.*:'rrjlfx*,f1","d Urban Deveropment r. tne uommrssaoner, Greater t-t-vOerbOjO .Ufuni" .-.-.reranoJna.H";;;;;il;,ji;;.;;- -.'-.1?**9.,3,poration;!p$[Sp*, 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 -*i cRb oepa'rtment. Sub- The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. the Commission",, tvtunic,p?tiiy","i6ooXnl"u"tp"t'.Ranoa Reddv District' rha rlenlrtv Execurive rl,tiX;J,'"iifirjrilt. Oivision-'t, ltirahimpatnam, Ranga Redd] urstrr:t: ih. r"r,tirari, Abdullapurmei triindat' Ranga Red^dy.District o ;:, bt i; S ft i ir 1 e 9 1 I' f,t.-t3,l^t' XBti[?Ji-'^l'. ry A N p,u uu f ,\ 5E$.138 *'E*]lE|n [?[, ; i;i i'h! stu-t. or r"r'ng'n; ; iHia"i'['o- tou r t Two ccs to cp FoR nEvl'rilii nEt'"c.1'r-i"i ih" strt. bl felanqana at Hvderabad IOUTI ohe CC to SRI G MADHUSUDAN REDDY- one cc to sRl slNGl nnvffiEfr'niEdi sC ion N/uNlclPALlr Y [oPUCl -SCTPR,GHI\4C IOPUCI --.,.. n 11 12 1 3. Two CD CoPies BIM BS \w I i : t t HIGH COURT DATED: 19t09t2O25 ORDER WP.No.2870B of 2025 CC TODAY I -, ,-.1Li i:. il t 1)(r 25SEPzffi .-t1 (,i II ,,..1 )'!,- -::') DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 1:.tod"^ l,ak Aow