✦ High Court of India · 17 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 17 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
17 Oct 2025
Length
1,337 words

These M.A.C.M.As' are settled before Lok Adalat vide common Award dated 13'09'2O25 passed by the Lok Adalat Bench of High Court Legal Services Committee' High Court for the State of Telangana' Hyderabad' In view of the same, nothing remains in 'the present M.A.C.M.As

2. Accordingly, these M'A'C'M'As' are disposed of in of the common Award dated 13'O9'2025 passed by of High Court Legal Servrces for the State of Telangana' the Lok Adalat Bcnch Committee, High Court Hyderabad. There shall be no order as to costs' Interim order and miscellaneous petitions' if any' pending in these M'A'c'M'As shallstlnd tlt#:^**t* ASSISTANT REG REDDY ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To

1. The Chairman Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District ' ir;s;;';iw;naPirtnv' (with records) 2. One CC to SRI J SANDHYA RANI' Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI' PAVAN KUMAR Y V ' 4. Two CD CoPies Lok-Adalat Award enclosed in both MACMA's' Advocate [OPUCI KWPRk t -='.--'-; -- - HIGH COURT BRMR,J DATED:1711012025 t1 S ft -/1 - <Q\ ', ) i, - 1 I i o tq P * COMMON JUDGMENT MAGMA.N0.2142 AND 2490 OF 2013 DISPOSING OF BOTH THE MACMA IN TERMS OF AWARD PASSED BY LOK.ADALAT ra\9 {^ Yr- - ad-\l?e / '/ ./ SEH -o HTGTI ,LOK shL d '/,;,-t \ ,/ - BEfORE THE-IrOK-ADA L-AT-. HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVIC ES COM,I |TTEE FOR TH E STATE OF TELANGA NA HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legat Services Authorities Act 1987 (Central Act)] Date:1 3.09-'20 25 Present: 1. Hon,ble Justice G.Sri Devi, (Former Judge of High Court for the Stale ot Telangana) Chairman

2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member --t E I (,*#ffi;i*.ffi*) AGI|NST- -- o.P. No.23 ot 2O12 otd o.P.No.3 58of2 008 (On the fite of the Motor Accidents Ctai ms Tribunat-cum- Additionat Distri ct Judge at Wanaparthy) Between:- Mohd. Nooruddin, S/o. Ahmed,Ati, Age: 37 years, Occ: Business, R/o.NrR corony, Kothakota Vlrage i',u.,lriii ,rllJnlilffi;. District.

1. M/s..Jatandhar constructions, rep. By Jatandha r. S/o. r SilJflffi :,:",]1il$:l#:i;;fi r;,H,iiflititl:ii1i;lill?tXl; jtE;ili,,""o*,", AND .... AppellqBVCtaimant

2. The lClCl Lombard Genera rrrronoo,.,iisi,ln:r'E:'jdr,;:ffi ,i;:i({ll;,!:1r:l j:; j::: j,if (poricy No:3003/ (Respondent No' 1 remained exparte and did not contest the claim of the appettant in the court betow. Hence, nu.'is ,naJe ortf .'p'r#rr=l p..,y and no notice is necessary to R_1 in this appeat) 1s5s* i oo / ooo, r;i;;'i;'i;-_o:2,_ifu to 20_02_2008) ^/ rf*r... Counsel for Appeltant/Ctaimant sri J.Sandhya Rani, Advocate/ Sri V.Gopat yadav, Advocate 'Respondents Counsel for Respondent No. Z/ lnsurance Company Sri N.Mohan Krishna, Advocite Representative of rnsurance company : sri Mohammed Abdut shabbeer, rhis appear havins been rererred ,".::Ili#fi1;:":r"i,tJ:il.",at and arter hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso ,n" 0.".r, ,i" i;;; ;;,, passed: Com pensation Awarded by the Tribunat AWARD ( p Rs 50 000 tUu eth da et UR ee s re nterest t tza Ion I I If I t v 7@ 5 oth usan q r na d Un m )v from t eh p ro o p ad et rtion et a e It p oc sts It tt It no t Awarded (Setttement Reached) in the Lok Adatat order passed in MVOP No.2: of 2) ,t- by the Motor Accidents Tribunat-cum-Additionat District Ju I io at Wanaparthy. SE8 (, Hrclr Cc[,rR LO( -l t Sri Mohammed Abdu[ Shabbeer, Sr Respondent No.2-lnsurance Comp r ior Manaler-Legat Ctaims for the a ly has appeared beforc the Lok Adalat and represented that the I r DeUant/ Petitioner/Ctaimant has i ervi cis Au !1$! !y,- W-arr a pa r,t hJ, appeared before tfre Dlstrict Lgga I No.2-lnsurance rConlpany that It is reported by the Responde, during the pendency of this Appc; t both the parti.gs.haye,mutuaity entered into a compromise and se-'led the matter. 'in)pursudnce ot the same, the Appel[ant/ Petition( r 'Ctaimant has agreed to receive an amount of Rs.2,28,488/- ([ r :ees Two lakhs twenty-eight thousand four hundred and eighty t ight onty) towards futt ahd finat setttement of his claim in addition r I the amount already deposited and the lnsurance Company has ag-r e,d to pay the same towards fu[ and fina[ setttement of the ctai r . According[y, compromise is recorded and the Award is passed I ,lore the Lok Adalat. ln view of the above said settletr€ tt, the lnsurance Company has agreed to deposit the above said ,rr r,lunt with'in a period of six (6) weeks from the date of reteipt :f copy of this Award, after deducting the amount that was d,rl osited, if any. ln the event of default or detay in making such d: rosit, the Ctaimant/Petitioner/ Appellant is entitted to ctaim inter ) t as awarded by the Tribunat. Apportionment of Compensation, if any Additional Direction(s):

1. The Appettant/Petitioner/Ctaimant is entitled to th€ efund of Court Fee paid in this case.

2. The amount already deposited by the lnsurance Corn rrny, if any, shatt be given credit to.

3. Soon after deposit by the lnsurance Company, the AE )ettant/ petitioner/Ctaimant is pe,rmitted to withdraw their entire share amount. ln token of consent for the above setttement and r rard, the parties and their counse[ have signed this award in our presence. ln terms of the compromise arrived at between thl parties, this case stands disposed of. \ .\ l\ r-l flVa hl No k2-- Lola t\ Nhcnh. elLta e0l3 tlEi'di iF olJ EP()l; t ii1- r',." {a t F-e:;,^r;,r'i !-1t (r. i l I I I ;r .-.:,.i Fy L . nr;orvdLlf L5,T 1"LJ'r'r Sothr,I ts) k"-#\4 -vq4 fl"S'\-)""-^-- Yddd, )) r ,-': r- r r-i:att..:.'rr ! I SEF $s,s H t , Sratc d1 *cr'' 4rrHRman) a- @ =rO EI GEi€RAI coa? ccc ai. oarrrE tEt_ to. *t I - obt- - rca t 50 ,) act udJ-*4 Couil,::;l i'c; i:h t,-d'qh J-*:A ""J,' Cfi;i il'l': (r! c (Senior 0iitrict Legat Wan ) J AuthoritY ce5 v- \,\E fsER-

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments