The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioner/Accused in CC.No. '1583 of 2025 on the file of 1't Additional Junior Civil Judge-Cum-lX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Rangareddy District' at Kukatpally, in the interest of justice. NO: 1 OF Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the Petitioner/ Accused in CC.No.1583 of 2025 on the file of 1"t Additional Junior Civil Judge- Cum-lX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Rangareddy District at Kukatpally pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: lrt.Riddhi .Sig_qd.ap.u, .ryo__D_1nesl.r Tgmkar, Aged 2g years, Occ. pvt lmptoyee, R/o Ftat No.101, spR Arjun ctassi6 npis, ptol rbs5z,6-u-otrastr chandra Bose Nagar, New Hafeezpet, serilingam'p"tiv, ningiLddy oistrict_ 500049. .Petitioner/Respondent No.2 in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 ol2o2s And 1- The state of relangana,.through wps lr-coRRlDoR, Gachibowli, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Colrt at Hyderabad. 2 .RespondenuRespondent No.1 in r.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 202s Dinesh Temkar, S/o. Lqt: Fgf_"ndar T_emkar, Aged 2g years, Occ. pvt lmployee, R/o FIat No-.101, s?it Arjun ctassii RpiJ, ptoi N;.$i,5i-or,rsr, chandra Bose Nagar, New Hafeezpet, serilingimFl-liv, nangireddv dltru- 500049. ...Petitioner/Accused in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminaj PLtition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/Respondent No.2 to compornjtn" offences in CC.No.1583 of 2025 on the file of 1't Addit,onal Junior Civil Judge-Cum-tX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Rangareddy District at Kukatpally. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 t Petition under Section 359(2) BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Fetition, the Hith Court may be pleased to re^cord the compromise statement and qursn tne fioceedings in 'Judge-Crim-Xl CC.No.1583 of 2025 on the file of 1't Additional Junior Civit Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Ctass Ranga Reddy District at krlkatpaly in the interest of justice. This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri RAKTHAPU SHEKAR GoUD, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla' Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and of sri Bandi Matthew, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TTRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and COMMON ORDER: This Criminal Petition is fited by the petitioner/accused under section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against him in c.c.No.1583 of 202s on the file oi the I Additionat Junior Civil Judge-cum-lX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally, registered for the alleged offence punishable under section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused as well as respondent No.2lde facto complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal petitiorrl tne parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed to record compromise between them and to compound the offences.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions. t

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2o2s which disclose tr# sne has wiltingly / 2 c,tp-tB7E:2fri15 consented for compromise. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide orders dated 22.Og.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 04.10.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 is allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.1583 of 2025 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-lX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally, registered against the petitioner/accused are hereby quashed subject to the 'r, .. --_-A:.::,::i.rli"-- :ll-. 1: 3 L1'D. J Crlp t2337 _2025 petitioner/accused is paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ,,TRUE COPY// SD/. C.DEEPIKA ISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The I Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-lX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Kukatpally, Cyberabad.

2. The Station House Officer, Women Police Station lt Corridor, Gachibowli, Cyberabd.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to SRI RAKTHAPU SHEKAR GOUD, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI BANDI MATTHEW, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Along with Joint Memo is enclosed herewith) Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri Rakithapur Shekar Goud, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 15.10.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Secretary High Court Legal Services Committee Telangana, Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.121536 of

2025. NVB/PSL HIGH COURT DATED:1511012025 mt[rfitrN o r-{ u A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 ln/And GRLP.No.12337 of 2025 ( *rtE s T4 o* o "" ?oilrlt t * OWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AND I. Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 ^ I I I . t9 IN THE HIGH COURT EOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I.A.No CRL.P.No. IN oF 2025 oF 2025 BETWEEN: I 1 2 DINESH TEMKAR S/o. Late R4jendar Temkar, Aged 28 years, Occ: Rrt Employee, R/o Flat No.l,O1, SPR fiun Classic Apts, Plot No.537, Subhash Chandra Bose Nagar, New Hafeezpet, Serilingampall5r, R R District-500049. . . . . Petitioners/ Accused AND The State of Telangana, through WPS IT-CORRIDOR, Gachibowli, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad SMT RIDDHI SIGADAPU W/o. Dinesh Temkar, Aged 28 years, Occ: Pvt Employee, R/o, Flat No.1O1, SPR Arjun Classic Apts, Plot No.537, Subhash Chandra Bose Nagar, $ New Hafe ezpet, Serilingampally, R R District-So0049 ... . . Respondent/De-facto Complainant JOINT MEMO 1 It is submitted that the Respondent No.2 had lodged a Complaint dated 27-tL-2O24 before WPS-IT, CORRIDOR, GACHIBOWLI, Cyberabad Commissionerate, against the Petitioner herein. Pursuant to the said complaint Police registered a case as FIR No.183/2025 for the offences €/^/7./ \x I I I I 20 U/s.85 BNS, against the petitioner herein, subsequently without any proper investigation has filecl charge Sheet vide cc.No. 1583 of 2o2s on the fite of Honble 1"t Addl. Junior civil Judge, cuM IX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class Ranga Recldy District at Kukatpally and the petitioner narne has been shown as Accused.

2. It is submitted that after registering the above case and after liling t].e charge sheet, the Respondent No.2 and Petitioner herein decided to enter into compromise and withdraw the above case, accordingly the Respondent No.2 withdrawn the above case against the petitioners and also the issue has been settted between the parties and they both living together happily. 3- It is submitted that due to intervention of elders and well ! wishers the matter has been settled amicably between the parties,assuchitisjustandnecesSa-rytoquashthe above c-c case and to record the compro'mise statement between the Petitioners and Respondent No.2. It is therefore prayed that this Hon,ble court may be pleased to record the compromise statement and euash the proceedings t 2t against the Petitioners/Accused in CC.No. 1583 of 2025 on the file of Honble lsr Addl.Junior Civil Judge, CUM IX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally in the interest ofjustice and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Hen"ce, this Joint Memo. 2Z s4 PETITI(NER RESPONDENT NO.2 o, F-- COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS R R DISTRICT DArE: lSs.zozs COUNSEL N 2 I, s