✦ High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Sep 2025
Length
1,138 words

Smt. Mathangi Srilatha, W/o Janardhan, Age: 40 Years, Occ: School Assistant, Head Master FCA, Zilla Parishad High School for Girls, Back side of Ramnatham Hospital, Madhira Town, Khammam district R/o H.No. 10-6- 'l 86/20, RaparthiNagar-2, Khammam AND ...PETITIONER

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Education), Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad.

2. Commissioner and Directorate of School Education, O/o Director of School Education, B-block. 2, Telephone Bhavan Rd, Saifabad, Khairtabad, Hyderabad, Telangana

3. The District Education Officer, Ramachandra Nagar Colony, Moti Nagar, Khammam, Telangana

4. Mandal Education Officer, Madhira town, Khammam district ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the name of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Gazetted Head Master (GHM) Grade ll as per G O tvls. No. 66 General Administration (Ser-C) Department Dt. 30-01-1991 and further as per G.O. Ms. No. 257, G.A. (Ser-C) Department, Dt. '10-06-1999, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of articles 14, '16, 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to promote the petitioner for the post of Gazetted Head Master (GHM) Grade ll as per G.O. Ms.No.66 General Administration (Ser-C) Department Dt. 30-( 1-1991 and further as per G.O. Ms. No. 257, G.A. (Ser-C) Department., Dt. 10-0{l 1999. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and include the name of he petitioner in the seniority list for promotion to the post of Gazetted Head Mas ter (GHM) Grade ll as per G.O.Ms.No.66 General Administration (Ser-C) Departr ent Dt. 30-01-1991 and further as per G.O.Ms.No.257, G.A. (Ser-C) Departme:r t., Dt. 10-06-1999, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt TARUN RAM AITHAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No.29077 0F 20.25 ORDER: With the consenr o[ both rhe parties, this Writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admissions stage.

2. This Writ Petition is hled under Arncle 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliet "...fo issue a turit, order or direction, more particul,a y, ote in the nature oJ urit of rrtanda ntus, declaritg the action of the respondents in not considering the name of tlrc petitioner for promotion to the post of Gozetted Head Master (GHM) Grode II as per G.O. Ms. No.66 General Administration (Ser-C) Department Dt. 3O-01-i991 and furthe.r as per G.O. Ms. No.257, O.A. (Ser C) DeparTme ., A. 10-06-1999, as illegal. arbitrary, unjust and in tiolalion of articles 14, 16, j9 and 21 of Constitution of Indn ond consequently d.irect the respond.ents to promote the petitioner for ttrc post of Gazetted Head Master (GHM) Grade ll as per G.O. ltfs. No.66 OeneraL Administration (*r-C) Department Dt. 30 0l 1991 ond furlher as per G.O. Ms. No.2S7, G.A. (Ser-C) Departtetlt.. Dt. lO 06 1999 and pass..."

3. Heard Sri Tarun Ram Aitham, learned counsel for the petitioner, and learned Govcrnment Pleader for Services-I, on behalf of the responden ts

4. karned counsel for the petitioner submits that while the petitioner was \{rorking as School Assistant/ in-charge Head Master (FAC), Zitla Parishad High School for Girls, Madhira, Khammam, an ACB case uide Crime No.O2 / RCT-KMM/ 2023 was registered against her, lor the olfencc punishable under Sections 7(a) and 7(b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and a charge sheet was 2 filed therein, which was numbered as C.C.No.23 ot 1,025 on rhe file of the Special Court for SpE and ACB Cass-cu r r-lll Additional District and Sessions Judge, Warangal. In conn )ction with her involvement in the ACB case, the petitioner u,er: placed under suspension on 26.02.2023, and was later reinstaLe. into service on O2.O7.2025. While the things stood thus, apptica r rns u,ere called for from the eligible candidates for promotion o the post of Gazetted Head Master Grade-ll. It is submitted tl-: r the petitioner has been continuously working as School Assistarr (Mathematics) from O8. 1O.2002, and is thus fully eligible a r d entitled for promotion to the said post. Therefore, thc petition: . submitted her However, thc reslto ldents are not application on O2.O8.2O25. .round o[ her considering her case for promotion, on the involvement in the ACB case. Therefore , learnc J this Court to direct the respondents to consider petitioner for promotion to the post o[ Gazcrl( ( Head Master (Grade-II) in terms of the orders issued in G.O i\4 ;. No.257 dated 10.06.1999. he case of the counsel prays Learned Government pleader for thc respr r clenls submits

5. that the ACB case filed against thc petitio,r:r adjudication, and therefore, shc is not eligible lor 1r ()motion to the post of Gazetted Head Mastcr Grade-ll. Hoqr r:r, rt is fairly pending IS la*ry t!'z '\' 3 submitted that the respondents will consider her case for promotion in terms of G.O.Ms.No.2S7 dated 10.06. l99g 6' Having regard to the submissions made by rearned counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Gazetted Head Master (Grade_II), as and when promotions are effected, strictry in terms of the orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.257, General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06. 1999. Miscellaneous petitions pcncling, il any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs SD/-S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO AS STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER To,

6. The Principal Secretary (Education), Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad, State of Telangana. The Commissioner and Directorate of School Education, O/o Director of SChool Education. B-block, 2, Telephone Bhavan Rd' Saifabad, Khairtabad, Hyderabad, Telangana The District Education Officer, Ramachandra Nagar Colony, Moti Nagar' Khammam, Telangana. Mandal Education Officer, Madhira town, Khammam district One CC to SRI TARUN RAI\,'! AITHAM, Advocate [OPUCI Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES l, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT] Two CD Copies

7. PMK BS NT HIGH COURT DATE D :2 410912025 ORDER WP.No,29077 of Z02S lE s !1.o ( 2 ? JAN ?$ZE , =. * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETTTION WITHOUT COSTS (ro b' \

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments