smt lMaddisetti Nirmara v. pass

Counsel for the Respondent's No's 1 TO 4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSIINIAN \IRIT PETITION No.283 70 of 2025 ORAL ORDER: Heard leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H.Somaiah Ezra Sastri, leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment.

2. Petitioner herein is claiming that she is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.09.00 guntas in Sy.No. 1 89/4 (old Sy.No.189/8), situated at Chintagurthi Village, Raghunathapalem Mandal, Khammam Division and District. In proofofthe same, she has filed copies latest pattadar passbook and title deed. According to the petitioner, it is a patta land. In the latest pattadar passbook also, it is mentioned as patta land. Even then, the subject property is mentioned in the list of prohibited properlies. Therefore, she has submitted online application during Revenue Sadassu t.ide application No.26140070064, dated

09.06.2025, to respondent No.2 rvith a request to delete the subject property from the list of prohibited properties. Despite receiving and acknolvledging the said application, respondent No.2 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction ofrespondent No.2, petitioner filed the present writ petition. 2 \€. \- , -;+"ili i. Y, :i EN!

3. \\'hereas, Ieamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Assignment, on instructions, lvould submit that respondent No 2 will consider the application submitted by the petitioner, strictly in accordance rvith the procedure laid dolvn under law,

4. \'ide report dated 30.12.2024, respondent No.4 informed respondent No.2 that the petitioner's name is mentioned as pattadar in respect of the aforesaid propert,u- till now. E'"-en then, respondent No.3 rejected the request made by the petitioner. Respondent No 2 has to consider the said report ofrespondent No.4.

5. In the light of the above discussion, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider the said online application. dated 09.06.2025, t'ide I.D.No'26140070064' submitted by' the petitioner durine Rer.enue Sadassu and pass appropriate orCers strictly' in accordance with lar'r bi" putting the petitionel and all intetested parties on notice and aftbrding them an opporlunitl.. If respondent No.2 is not inclined to accept the request made by' the petitioner, he shall assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order and communicate the same to the petitioner' He shall complete the entire exercise within sixty (60) days from --r 3 the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII D .K.BHAVANI SWAMY TANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

4. tl' The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, State of Telangana, Hyderabad The District Collector, Khammam, District The Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam Revenue Division, Khammam The Tahsildar, Raghunadhapalem Mandal, Khammam District One CC to SRl. ASHOK REDDY KANATHALA Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court forthe State of Telangana. TOUTJ

7. Two CD Copies MBC GJP I ( HIGH COURT DATED:18/09/2025 ORDER WP.No.28370 of 2025 ,..':' +: -Jr 1f- STA.I: 1 [6 ',i,'! ,c :,) r'* n,"st \YRIT PETITIO\ IS DISPOSED OF \\'ITH OUT COST J \"