✦ High Court of India · 18 Sep 2025

Smt. Vittala Savithri v. The State of Telangana

Case Details High Court of India · 18 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
18 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,074 words

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondents in not receiving the application for electricity connections to the petitioner property bearing house No. 14-20-50111 on plot No. 1 1 2, admeasuring 100 Sq. yds in Survey No.888,889 and 890 situated at Rana Pratap Nagar, Kukatpally Village, Balangar Mandal, Rangareddy District as illegal, arbitrary, un.lust and consequently direct the respondents to receive the application for the electricity connections and release the power supply with requirec rneters without any f urther delay. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the rircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Co ''1 may be pleased to direct.the Respondents to receive application of the Petitior'(rr and release power supply with required meters to the petitioner prof rrty bearing house No.14-20-501/1 on plot No. 112, admeasuring 100 Sq. yr1 -'in Survey No 888' 889 and 890 situated at Rana Pratap Nagar, Kukatpii v Village. Balangar Mandal Rangareddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. NIKITA GOENKA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI N.SREEDHAR iEDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCT The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESII BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.28334 oF 2O2s ORDER Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to receive her application form and release individual service conncction to her properry i.e. House No. 14-20-5O1/ 1, PIot No.112, admeasuring 10O square yards in Survey Nos.888, 889 and 89O situated al Rana Pratap Nagar, Kukatpally Village, Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

2. Heard learned counsel for thc petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energr on behalf of Respondent No. I and Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSPDCL on behalf of Respondents 2 to 6.

3. Ms. Nikita Goenka, learned counsel for the petitioner submits lhat in somewhat similar circumstances, lr,hilc dcaling wirh Writ Petition No.2O12t of 2025, this Court by order dated

14.O7 .2025, directed the respondents authorities therein to release Lhe service connection, subject to the compliance of the statutory requirements by the petitioner therein, and hence, requested this Court to pass similar order in the present Writ Petition also.

4. Recently, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajendra Kumar Barjatga a. U.P. Aoas Euam Viko.s Po,risho.dl, in the larger 2024 SCC Online SC i767 2 public interest, issued directions in addition ,the directives issued in Re: l)irections in the ma er of demoht ,, t of structures. Relevant for thc purpose of this case are: "(iv) All the necessary service connections. --uch as, Dlectricitl,, watcr supply, sewerage cotlnec ion, e[c., shall be iliven by the service provider / Bo, r.J to the buildings only after the production of the c ,:epletiorr / occupation certificate. (v) Evr:n after issuance of completion c rr.tifrcate, deviatirtrr / violation if any contrary to thc 1:lanning pcrmission brought to the notice of the r.rthority immcdratt: steps be tal<en by the said r:thority conccrned, in accordance with law, agi rrst the builder 7' ou.ner / occupant; and the officiz who is responsib.Le for issuance of wrongful com l)l3tion / occupertior-r certificate shall be depart mcrrlally lorthwith. l.rocecded (vi) No Permission / liccnce to conduct any b r5ins5s 7 trade must be given by any authorities inclu, ing local bodies of States / Union Territories unaulhoriscd building irrespeclive of residential or commercial building. br:ing lt1 (vii) The devclopment must be in conformit). ,rith the zonal plan land usage. Any rnodihcation to sL .-t zonal plan and usage must be taken by strictly ollowing the rules in place land in consideration of t , larger public interest and the impact on the environ,,r:nt,,. /,/// -//, -f 3

5. Since the prayer of the pe titioner is to receive her application and rclease thc individual service connection to the subjcct property, this Court without going into merits of the matter, directs the respondents to receive the petitioner's application and release individual service connection to the subject property, subject to petitioner complying with the directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajendra Kumar BarJatga's case (supra) and the statutory requirements prescribed by the local authorities.

6. The Writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of. No costs. 7 . Conseque ntly, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// ( AS i SDi. C. DEEPIKA ANT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Power and Energy Department, Secretariat' Hyderabad, State of Telangana-

2. The chairman and Managing Director, Southern Power Distribution company Ltd., of Telangana. Mint Compound' Hyderabad'

3. The superintending Engineer (operation), .southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. of Telangana, Cybercity, Hyderabad'

4. The Divisional Engineer (operational), s^outhern Power Distribution company LtO of Tetangana; Gachibowli Division, Cybercity Circle'

5. The Asst. Divisional Engineer (Operationa]), .southern Power Distribution ' Corpiny Ltd., of ietanga"na, Konddpur Sub Division, Cybercity Circle ' - 6.TheAssistantEngineer(operational),.southernPowerDistributionCompany Ltd.. of Telangana-, Allapur Section, Cybercity Circle 7. One CC to Ms. NIKITA GOENKA, Advocate [OPUC] S One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY' SC FOR TGSPDCL [OPUC] g.TwoCCstoGPFoRENERGY,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad [OUT]

10. Two CD CoPies BSR GJP \r HIGH COURT DATED: 1810912025 ORDER WP.No.28334 of 2025 .-..: 141 t Zon '\. :/ 'i (1.,. DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments