The High Court · 2025

petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the Thigh handed action of the respondents No. 3 in issuing the impugned letter bearing No. D/271 1t2025 dated 16.06.2025 (which is not served to the petitioner) with regard to the mutation proceedings in File No. 81/946/1994 dated 25.02.1995 if not issued any mutation in respect of land in Sy.No. 100, admeasuring Ac. 1-21 gts situated at Durgamagadda Locality, Karimnagar district, basing on the said impugned proceedings the Police is filed written instructions which is false and incorrect in Wp No. 26345 of 2025 on 02.09.2025 is illegal, arbitrary contrary to law and violative of Principles of Natural Justice apart from violation of Articles, 21 and a 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same, further direct the 3rd respondent without following due process of law not to issue such false letter or proceedings against the petitioner without proper enquiry in respect of land in Sy.No. 100, admeasuring Ac. 1-21 gts situated at Durgamagadda Locality, Karimnagar District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend letter bearing No. D/271 112025 dated 16.06.2025 (which is not served to the petitioner) with regard to the mutation proceedings in File No. B1/94611994 dated 25.02.1995 respect of land in Sy.No. 100, admeasuring Ac. 1-21 gts situated at Durgamagadda Locality, Karimnagar district, basing on the said impugned proceedings the Police is filed false and frivolous written instructions in WP No. 26345 of 2025 on 02.09.2025 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MIRZA RIZWAN ALI BAIG FOR SRI MIRZA AZMATH ALI BAIG Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER ! I ,( f HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAI) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL TITRIT PETITION 728 of 2O2S DATE OF ORDER: 28. LL.2O25 BETWEEN Lingampally Narayana AND The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary, . Revenue Department and 3 others. ... Petitioner ... Respondents : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "...to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the respondents No.3 in issuing the impugned letter bearing No.D /27 lL /2025, dated . 16.0.6.2025 which is not served to the petitioner with regard to the mutation proceedings in File No. B L I 946 / 1994 , dated 25.02.1995, if not issued any mutation in respect of land in Sy. No.1OO, admeasuring Ac.1.21 gts, situated at Durgamagadda Locality, Karimnagar District, basing on the said impugned proceedings the Police is filed written instructions which is false and incorrect in WP.No.26345 of 2025 on O2.O9.2O25 is illegal, arbitrary, contraqr to law and violative of Principles of Natural Justice apart from violation of Articles 21 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the sarne, further direct the 3'd respondent without following ! -- _?-\< 2 due process of law not to issue such false letter or proceedings against the petitioner without proper enquiry in respect of land in Sy.No.1OO, admeasuring Ac.1.21 gts situated at Durgamagadda Locality, Karimnagar District..."

2. Heard Sri Mirza Rizwan Ali Baig, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4- Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would fairly submit that the petitioner filed a complaint under Section 2OO Cr.P.C., on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Karimnagar and on the said complaint, cognizartce has been taken and referred the case of the petitioner to the SHO, III Town Karimnagar Police Station. Thereafter, a case has been registered uide FIR No.S6 of 2025 for the offence under Sections 467, 468,.471 of IPC. He would submit on the complaint made by the petitioner, one other complaint has been filed against hirn uide FIR No.LO7 of 2025, I dated 29.03.2025 and since the notice has also been issued uide C.No.1O7 /B-ll /Cr /2025, dated 26.O8.2025. He would further submit that a writ petition has been filed by the petitioner before this Court uide W.P.No.26345 of 2025 seeking to quash the 3 proceedings against the petitioner herein. During course of proceedings before the coordinate Bench of this Court, a letter has been addressed by the Revenue Divisional Officer utde Lr. No.D/27L|/2025, dated 16.06.2025 with regard to the mutation proceedings in file No.B I 1946 / t994, dated2S. O2.L995 in respect of land in Sy.No.100, admeasuring Ac.1.21 guntas situated at Durgammagadda locality, Karimnagar District, where the petitioner as well as one Mr.Peddapalli Ravi are claiming the ownership at logger-heads and requested to ascertain whether the documents issued by the then Mandal Revenue Officer, Karimnagar are genuine or not and the file No.B 1946194, dated 25.02.1995, dated 25.02.1995, is -not issued any mutation. Accordingly, it has not been attested and distribution of copy in the same year i.e., 1994.

4. l,earned.counsel for the petitioner would further submit that though the petitioner has made attempts to obtain the said a communication, but no information has been sought from the Mandal Revenue Officer, Karimnagar. Therefore, this writ petition has been filed seeking to suspend the proceedings issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Karmimnagar vide ( 1 \ 4 ^.at No.Dl l27Lll2o25, dated t6.o6.2o25. He would submit that, unless the proceedings in File No. B /9461 1994 dated 25.02.1995 are verified, it would be evident that the Investigating oflicer proceeded against the petitioner, conducted the investigation, and submitted a false report in place of the original report. Therefore, the respondents ought to have verified with the proceedings in File No. B/94611994 dated 25.02.1995, and the genuinity there in. Hence, he would seek to set-aside the proceedings ufde No.D | 127 Ll 12025, dated 16.06.2025.

5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that this writ petition is filed seeking suspension of proceedings No.D L 127 Ll 12025, dated L6.O6.2O25, issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, pertaining to the proceedings in File No.B 194611994, dated 25.02.1995 in respect of land in Sy.No.100, admeasuring Ac.L.2L guntas situated at Durgamagadda Locality, Karimnagar District. He would submit that the subject matter is pending before the a coordinate Bench of this Court uideW.P.No.26345 of 2025 since the said writ petition has been filed by the petitioner himself seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR No. LO7 of 2025 dete-d \ k I 5 2g.O3.2O25. He would submit that the subject matter is the part of the criminal investigation and filing of this writ petition would not address the grievance of the petitioner herein. If the official respondent is summoned by the Trial Court, in accordance with the proced.ure laid down by law, the official respondent would furnish the same to the Court. t \

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would further submit that only a communication has been issued in respect of the information sought by the respondents, that itself would not rise to file the writ petition before this Court. Hence, he would submit that the writ petition is filed under I t misconception and seek to dismiss this writ petition.

7. This Court having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and on examination of materials placed before this Court, is of the *, opinion that this writ petition does not deserve any further consideration as it is filed under misconception since the petitioner has already filed the writ petition vide W.P.No.25345 of 2025 before this Court, seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR 3in*..******.. - 6 4 No.1O7 of 2025 dated 29.03.2025 and the matter is pending before the coordinate Bench of this Court- Therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedies before the said coordinate Bench of this Court. As a result, this Court does not see any reason to keep the writ petition pending further. g. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed //TRUE COPYII SD/.A.V.S. PRASAD EPUry REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER

1. One CC to SRI MIRZA AZIVIATH ALt BA|G, 2- Two ccs to GP for Revenue. High court for the state of Telangana at! 3. Two CD Copies cI To MP BS ; HIGH COURT DATED i2811112025 Hf: SI4 0 7 JAN 2026 i-,-\ ..t. o ( * ORDER i I I WP.No.28728 of 2025 I DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS l tle-c