✦ High Court of India · 14 Oct 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 14 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
14 Oct 2025
Length
1,524 words

Counsel for the Appellant : SRl. A RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 6 : SRI T D PANI KUII \R Counsel for the Respondents No.7 & 8: The Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR M.A.C.M.A. No.l41 of 2023 JUDGMENT: I-carni,rl counscl appearillg ii,r iir.- rppellant rep,Jiiccl ihar ihe matter has beer-r rel'erred to Llic Lok Acialat constituted by the High Court Legal Services Coramittce. H;,deLabad, tbr settlernent, arrd aftcr due deliberations, the Lok .\iialat passed an livard on

13.09.2025 as per the tenns agreed upon by the parties. 2- in r,ierr, of the aloi'csaiii :ubtnissi,rn. this .'\ppeai is rlispt,s:ri oi in terms of the award dat--o 11.09.20?5 p::sed b1 the Iligh Court Legai Servicr:: Cl',eimitiee. i\o costs. .-1. As r. :.,eriuel, miscellar*i'iis oet,tions t-,tirdins rl ani sra!l stancis closed SD/- M JAWAHAR REDDY SSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Ae

1. The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Trib unal- Cum - lX Additional District Judge, at Kamareddy.

2. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court Buildings at Hyderbad.

3. One CC to SRl. A RAMAKRISHNA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRl. T D PANI KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies GE/ABK Enclosing along with a copy of Lok Adalat Award HIGH COURT DATEO:1411012025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.141 ot 2023 tr, t IIE S ll ( n I ,r t'! ?0rq z uJ d> \ * Or:, NTC' * DISPOSING OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD 1 4 x, BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD) IUnder Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)] Date: 13-O9-2025 SEP Present:1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi, {FormerJudge, Hon'ble High Court for the Srate of TelanBana) Chairman

2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, HIGH COURT LOK AOAIAT I o I J 7 t '4le o! 1o\ n t Member M.A.C.M.A. No. 1 41 of 7023 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST O.P. No.54 of 2019 (On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Accident C{aims Tribunat-cum- lX Addrtional District Judge at Kamareddy) BETWEEN: Shriram General lnsurance Co. Ltd., Represented by its Branch Manager, Branch Office, Door No.5-6-570/8,2d Floor, Eeside Axis Bank, Near Kapila Hotel, Hyderabad Road, Nizamabad Town and District. AND ...Appellant/Respondent No. 3

1. Matoth Kamsi W/o Late Redya Nayak, Age: 32 years, Occ: Housewife 2. Matoth Naveen S/o Late Redya Nayak, Age: '16 years, Occ: Student, Minor 3. Matoth Sona Bai D/o Late Redya Nayak, Age: 14 years, Occ: Student, Minor 4. Matoth Soni S/o Late Redya Nayak, Age: 10 years, Occ: Student, Minor 5. Matoth Bjooti W/o Thaourya, Age: 54 years, Occ: Housewife 6.Matoth Thaourya S/o Lacha, Age: 69 years, Occ: Housewrfe (Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are minors and are being Represented by their mother and naturat guardian Maloth Kamsi i.e. Respondent No.1 herein) At[ are of ST Lambada Caste, R/o H.No.10-7, Kaditabai Thanda, Venkatapur Vittage, Tekmal Mandat, Medak District - 507 302, Presentty residing at Ashoknagar Cotony, Kamareddy Town &. District

7. Mahmad Anwar @ Anwar Pasha Mohd, S/o Afzat, Age:28 years, Caste: Mustim, Occ: Driver of Toofan Vehicte bearing No. AP 29 T87448, R/o H.No.5-13, Kothapatty VitLage, Papannapet, Mandat, Medak District 502 331

8. Tajuddin Syed S/o Khaja Miya, Age: Major, Occ: Owner of Toofan Vehicte ...Respondents Noi. 1 to 6/Petitioners bearing No. AP 29 TB 7448, R/o H.No.10-45/3, Satojipatty Kadtoor Tekmal, Madak District 502 332. ...Respondent Nos. 7 & 8/ Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 Counsel for Respondents / Petitioners : Sri T.D,Phani Kumar, Advocate/ Sri Kaniganti Devaraj, Advocate Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Mohammed Abdul Shabbeer, Senior Manager Legal Ctaims Counsel for the lnsurance Company : A.Ramakrishna Reddy, Advocate This appeal having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: \ -s-;*-......:-,, .!r,' r t AWARD Compensation Awarded by the Tribunat Compensation Awarded (Setttement Reached ) in the Lok Adalat SER HIGH COURT LOX ADATAT -.t n t -qd{t o ro7 t APportionment of Compensation, if any ousan{ Eighteen lakhs ighty-eighr th 7 .5% pt r ann ization. Rs. 18,8S,138/-(Rupeei hundred and thirty-eight onty) with costs I r(l interest at from the date of fiting of the petition titt rf : date of rea( This is an appeaI fited by the lnsurance Cl lpany aqgrioved by the 5 passed in O.p No.54 of ZO19 by rhe Ch,r rtan, Motor Acci(jent C Iain]s ""- I Tribunat Cum,lX Additionat District Judg<, r l(anra reddy 5rr Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer Senior \ tnager Legat Ctaims tor the Appeltant/Respondent No. .3_lrrsura nce Conrl any has appeared beforr: the Lok Adatat and represented that the Res: )ndent/petit ioner Nos. I t,o 6 have appeared before the Secreta rY, High [ )urt Legal Sorvices Authcr n ty, Hyder-abad, on .l0-9.2025 It is reported by both the parties tllat , uring the pendency of this Appea{, they have mutuauy entered rntc :ompromise and settll.,d the matter. As per the setttement , the Respol-( tn ts / petitioners have agreed to receive an amount of Rs. l 4,00,0N/ - ( tupees Fourteen takhs onty) towards fut[ and fina[ setttenr ent of their ( aim apart from the amount atready deposited and the Instr rance Compar I has agreed to pay the same towards fuU and final setttement of the ct: i n. Accordingly, cor]rpromise ts recorded and the Award rs passed before t le Lok Adalat ln view of the above said settlement, the lt urance Company has agreed to deposit the above said amc "r,h,, :]"::i::[r: ;ffit;:]:::: ll:T;:: date or receipt or."p, deposited, if any. ln the event of defautt or r elay in making such deposit, the Claimants/Appe[tants are entitted to ( I rim interest u, ur.rurO"a Oy the Tribunat. The apporti onment among the Res pondentr f rriG;erlcGidnt t,r.,-t Nosr- to 6 shatt be made as per the apportionment r r :ermined by the Tribunal in M. V.O.P.No.54 of 2O19. Add itional Direction( s): 1 2 . The Appettant is entitled ro the refund of Court Fee paid in til . The amount atready deposited by th;;;;;....fiJj"i, ,, ,, 3. Soon after deposit bv the u 1" ;;i;;i ;" j il-"i1"[.H",[:,T ?X?f",ff #:Tffi i I 1.1 "*t:.*."?'""#',f,,i lT:.1, - j":, i " o" li t i''3"- Lp, i, il |,il tetermineo ufiil iili:l attain maioritv, as per the o..r( tn token of consent for th( , have signed thi;;;;;;; J;"r?:r"J;.';ttrement and award, rhq 1,; " ; case. l, shatl be given credit ldent/Ctaimant Nos. 1. and the shares of the f ixed deposit in anv rs and apportionment 'ties and their counsel In terms disposed of. l of the compromise arrived at between the pa]1 es, this case stands \ ,4 "n n Wq^M

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments