✦ Telangana High Court

Judgment · High Court

N V SHRAVAN4 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of d

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall staad clor _-o, vrrcu. ( stirrre c.losed. No order as to costs. //rRUE copy, t"^Jtgrory1#,tTffffi To, sEclofr_oFFtcER Home Department, Telangana sgcretariat, Stare of oreotice, cvbera bad commissionerare Gachibowri,

Judgment

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRI PETITION NO: 2827 T 80F 2025 Between: fi *I#fi l.%,t::tfl#f#rE,is: Bti3l"i;o%oi,,,,?,T,,?38,,u:;n:i AND 1 2 4 ...PETITIONER ,TS3; rlE fn.31", gJ:J?J,ffift t v its prin cipa r s ecreta ry, H o m e Depa rrm e nt, IX3"r:3Hf33ffi: ":l Police, cvberabad commrssionerate Gachibowri, Ihu Deputy Commissio commission6rat- - "'"'-o'uner of Police, Balanagar Zone, cyberabad The Assistant Commissic _.. ....._-,Jner of poljce, Balanagar Division, Cyberabad Commissionerate__ I3ilr, jlif.??L% "r potice, Batanasar porice Station, cyberabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition undgr Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit firecl therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or.orders one in the nature of wRrr oF I\,ANDAM,. declaring the inaction of the respondent no.5 for without any permissions for conducting of Ravana Dahanam at Vinayaka corony near Gaddi chain, Balanagar for firing of Dahanakanda (Ravanasura) on the event of Dasara festivar ie ' Vijayadashami in the pubric prace without any safety of the common pubric and residentiar area inspite of compriant dt.o8rogr2025 for 02/1012025 0n the occasion of Vijayadashami to stop the Dahanakanda (Ravanasura) on the event -'---------7 of Dasara festival justice. i.e., Vijayadashami' as illegal and improper' in the interest of tA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Coud may be pleased to direct the Respondents No 5 not to grant any permission for conducting of Ravana Dahanam at Vinayaka Colony near Gaddi Chain' Balanagar for {iring of Dahanakanda (Ravanasura) on the event of Dasara festival ie ' Viiayadashami in the public place without any safety of the common inspite of compliant dt OB 09 2025 for 02 1O '2025 on the occasion of Vijayadashaml to stop the Dahanakanda (Ravanasura) on the event of Dasara festival i.e ' Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K'BUCHI BABU Counsel for the Respondents: ASST'GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER 11ntic 'nO t"t'O^"^:t:?:,' VijaYadashamt t THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN TI ETI ON IYo.2 8278of2o25 T P KUIVIAR oRD ER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned me appearing for . With the consent of the parties, this writ -r ^"r L'DPosal at the admission stage Assistant Government pleader for Ho respondent Nos. 1 to s petition is being taken up for disposal at t itserf.

2.

Thi S writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:- "...declartng tlte inaction of respond.ent No.S for without any permis: Dahnnam,, vi,.a::: ::;:;":::Z,y"r-:::; Balanagar for firing of Dahanakandn Rauahasura on the euent of Dasara festtual t.e., Vtjagada"n public place wit?nut ang safetg of th.e common publtc and resid.ential c dt.o8/os/202s ro, ililorr';:.:_ ,I ,:::::":, Vijagadashami to stop the Dahanakctnda Rauanasura on the euent of Dasara festiual i.e., Vijagadashami as illegal and improper. " ^ ^ ,n'*

3.

The facts of the case in brief as stated are that petitioner is a resirtgSrt of Balanagar and it is submitted that to maintain pubtic peace and without any !^rd.dres and frre incidents on *re I I 2 occasion of Vijayadashami festival (Dussehra) ot O2'|O'2O25' petitioner approached respondent authorities on 08'09'2025 and made a complaint regarding unauthorized conduct of Ravana Dahanam, however' respondent No'4 refused to receive the complaint' Thereafter' petitioner has sent the complaint through RPAD and the same was received by respondent authorities' Since, no action has been initiated the present writ petition is hled. lrarned counsel for the petitioner has also {iled copies of photographs taken last year in support of his case'

4.

Though various grounds are raised in the writ petition' learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his prayer seeking a direction to respondent authorities to dispose the petitioner's representation dated O8'Og '2025' in a time bound period'

5.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents submits that if the petitioner's representation dated 08.09.2025 is still pend.ing for consideration; the respondent authorities may be directed to dispose of the said representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with 7aw- J

Operative part

6.

In view of the submission made by learned appearing on either side and without expressing any opi the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of d the respondent authorities to dispose the peti representation dated Og.Og.2O2S and pass appropriate within a period of one (l) week from the date of receipt of counsel nton on irec ting tioner's orders a copy of this order.

7.

Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall staad clor _-o, vrrcu. ( stirrre c.losed. No order as to costs. //rRUE copy, t"^Jtgrory1#,tTffffi To, sEclofr_oFFtcER Home Department, Telangana sgcretariat, Stare of oreotice, cvbera bad commissionerare Gachibowri,

1.

The Principal Secretarv Hnrno n^^^-* - . _ " lgruloinily; "#1# : iFtS#Ti-tffi , IHH?Sr,lyrComrn-issioner of potice, Batanagar Zone, Cyberabad 4. The Assistant Commi _ uommrssronerate. sstoner of police, Balanagar Division, Cyberabad " ll:rfli3.ffror of potice, Batanasar potice Station, Cyberabad 9. 9ne CC ro SRt K.BUC 6. #i B5t's,?": w tBH'JB #a:Hbfr tff f id ii,:t?l tu or r"r, n ga n a ro Url BSR HIGH COURT DATED:1 810912025 CC TODAY ,/..'...< ! ;": i I ',) Ii.-) 'ti,,,$" ;/ .: \', , --t .';11 , ,', 1, \. i: J.l,-il )j' f, 11 st? 2$15 + ; tt' .\-,-rr-'./. - -'.-r,-:"Hj.r---- tr.l i'.t" ' . 2' ORDER WP.No.28278 of 2025 \ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS .rA A

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of d

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments