Pilla Surya Janardhanarao v. Pilla Satyanarayana Murty & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed directing
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 47
Judgment
Cause title
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3820 OF 2011
Between : Pilla Surya Janardhanarao ... PETITIONER
A N D Pilla Satyanarayana Murty and others. …RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 3820 OF 2011
ORDER:
Operative part
This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of Constitution of India is filed for non-passing of orders in E.A.No.129 of 2004 in E.P.No.43 of 2000 in O.S.No.26 of 1999 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka. The grievance of the petitioner is that he filed an application under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to enquire into the matter and declare that the decree in O.S.No.26 of 1999 is executable against the petitioner in respect of the schedule property for sale. The said application has not been disposed of by the Executing Court since 2004. As seen from the docket proceedings of Executing Court, the records are not available in the Executing Court and the relevant case records are pending before this Court in an appeal. Therefore, the question of disposal of application may not arise, unless the Executing Court receives the records from this Court. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed directing the Executing Court to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner after receipt of records from this Court. There shall be no order as to costs. ______________ K.C.BHANU. J SEPTEMBER 29, 2011. YVL
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed directing
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 47.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.