The High Court · 2025

8. Sri. Mandala Raji Reddy S/o. Papi Reddy, AgetTl years, Occ: Business, R/o. Qr.No. 8.14, Gouthaminagar, FCI Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

9. Sri. Sabbani Mallaiah S/o. Lingaiah, Aged 60 years, Occ: Business, nfo. H.f.f o. f S-S- I 3 7, Lakshminagar, Godavarikhani Mandal, Peddapatti District. .==: \ I

10. Sri. Gandla Shankar S/o. Odelu, Aged 48 years, occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 5 4 -27 9, NanashataPalli, NTPC Area, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District'

11. Sri.Pingili Bhaskar Reddy Sio- Gopal Reddy, Aged 53 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 2l-2-8912, Markendaya colony, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam, Peddapalli District'

12. Mekala Sridhar S/o. Komaraiah, Aged 28 years, Occ: Business, R./o. H.No. 22-7-53, Khajapalli, NTPC Areq Ramagundam Mandat, Peddapalli District.

13. Ambala Rajesh S/o. Odelu, Aged 39 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 1 4-5-62ll l ; J awahamagar, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam Mandal, Peddapalli District.

14. Mohd. Hidayatuddin Waseem S/o Mohd Shafiuddin Aged : Major, Occ: not known to petitioner. H. No. 10-3-732 /1, VNIC Circle -5, Hyderabad.

15. Anuma Bhadraiah S/o Narsaiah Aged : Major, Occ: not known to petitioner. PJo. H No. 22-8-64, Matangi Colony , FCI, Godavarikhani, Peddapalli District.

16. Jangapalli fankaiah @ Gaddi Kankaiah S/o. Odaiah Aged : Major, Occ: not known to petitioner. R/o. H.No. C-2611, Venkat KiranNilayam Gautaminagar Housing Society , PO, Fertilizer City- ) ) .:::'i, .. t::: r-:' EL i !. 1 Ei g;

17. Vadla konda Yellappa S/o Dasharadham Aged : Major, Occ: not known to petitioner. R/9. H.No. 18-5-144/ l, Laxminagar, Godavarikhani, Peddapalli District.

18. Kanjapuram Rajendar S/o Bramhanandam Aged : Major, Occ: not known to petitioner. R./o. H no 16-3-351, Tirumalnagar, Godavarikhani , Pedtlapalli District. (RRS to 18 are impleaded as per C.O.dt.09/03/2022in1.A.No.1t20221 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in not initiating any action on petitioners representation dated 1 1_O5_ 2021 made against the ilregar and unauthorized construction of compound wa, with gate around the petitioners plot bearing No. 29, near House No. 22_l_ 108, admeasuring 325 sq.yards, in sy.No.28s, situated at Medipari Virage shivar' Kasipe,i Hamlet interior rocarity, within the limits of Ramagundam Municipar corporation, peddapari Mandar and District, as iregar, arbitrary, unconstitutionar and against the principles of naturar justice, and consequenry praying this Honbre court to direct the 3rd respondent to initiate action against the illegal and unauthorized construction of compound wall. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 1 1tOSl2O21 , pending disposal of writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI T.RAMCHANDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : ASST.Gp FOR MC'L ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2&4 : ASST. cp FOR REVENUE COUNSEI fOr thE RESPONdENT NO.3:SRI KADURU PRABHAKAR RAO,SC FOR MC counsel for the Respondent No.Stol8 : sRr T.RAMCHANDER RAo The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.36264 of2O2L ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for respondent No. 1, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 4 and Sri Kadaru Prabhakar Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3. perused the record.

2. In view of the nature of relief sought by the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed of at ttre admission stage dispensing with notice to respondent Nos.S to 18.

3. Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owrrer and possessor of house bearing No.22_7_10g on plot No.29 admeasuring 325 Sq.yds situated at Medipalli VillaAe Shivar, Kasipelti hamlet interior locality, within respondent No.3-Municipality, on the st.g1Clt t _of a ) W.P.N o.36264 of202t regrstered sale deed bearing document No.27O1 of 2OI4, dated 30.O7.2014. Respondent Nos.S to lg constructed compound wall without obtaining prior permission from respondent No.3. They obstructing the way/road reaching to the petitioner,s house. Therefore, he has representation, dated lI.OS.2O2L submitted a respondent No.3 w.ith a request to take action against respondent Nos.S to 1g. Despite receiving ald acknowledging the said representation, respondent No.3 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.3, petitioner filed the present writ petition.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also placed reliance on the information furnished by respondent No.3 to show that respondent Nos.S to lg have constructed the compound wall without obtaining permission from respondent No.3. KL,J W.P.No.36264 of 2021 3

5. Whereas, Sri Kadaru prabhakar Rao, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3, on instructions, would submit that respondent No.3 will inspect the site, consider the representation, dated LL.O5.2O2I and if the allegations made by the petitioner are found to be correct, respondent No.3 will take action against respondent Nos.5 to 1g strictly in accordance with the procedure laid down under the Telangana Municipalities Act, 2OL9 (for short the Act, 2O19) by putting t].e petitioner and respondent Nos.S to 1g on notice and affording them an opportunit5r of hearing.

6. In the light of the said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to consider the representation, dated 1L.OS.2O2I, inspect the site and if the allegations made by the petitioner are found to be correct, he shall take action against respondent Nos.S to 1g strictly in accordance with the procedure laid down under the Act, 2Ol9 by putting the petitioner a,d respondent Nos.S to 1g on notice and ( t(( .l W.P.No.362 64 of20Zi K 4 affording them an opportunity of hearing. He shall complete the said exercise within a period of six (6) weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions , if any, pending in the Writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. T. JAYASREE SISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, '1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administratio Department, State of ielangan'a, Secretariat, H 2. The District Collector, peddapalli District, peddapalli 3. The Commissioner, Ramagundam Municipal Corporation, peddapalli, n nd Urban Develo pment yderabad Peddapalli District \

4. The Tahsildar, Peddapalli Mandal and District. 5. One CC to SRI T.RAMCHANDER RAO, Advocate. tOpUCI 6. Two ccs to GP FoR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High court for the state of Telangana. [OUT]

7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

8. One CC to SRI KADARU PRABHAKAR RAO, SC FOR MUNIC|PAL|TY/MC IoPUCI

9. Two CD Copies. BSK GJP YV \ \ e0 TH 0 .J T O 7 JUL ?N5 , .J,(: )3 HIGH COURT DATED:0410212025 ORDER WP.No.36264 o12021 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS t?, .4t.lx W