Opp;- Sri devi talhes, Gandhi Chowk, Nizamabad v. K.mahender
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Therefore, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Award dated 28,09.2024 passed in.the Lok-Adalat. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMA ot T REGISTRAR To, //TRUE COPY// '1. The Commissioner for Workmens Compensation Commissioner of…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all proceedings in WC.No.1 '1 of 2009 dt. 08-05-2014 by the Commissioner for Workmen's / Employees Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, N izamabad ,,'Counsel for the Appellant: M/s. V.K. Naidu Counsel for the Respondent No.1:
Sri M. Bhushan Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.2: M/s. K. Ram Chandra Reddy The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA CwIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.46 of 2O15
JUDGMENT:
This appeal preferred by the appellant/Insurance Comparry, was referred to the Lok-Adalat on 28.09.2024 and an Award was passed.
Therefore, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Award dated 28,09.2024 passed in.the Lok-Adalat. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMA ot T REGISTRAR To, //TRUE COPY// '1. The Commissioner for Workmens Compensation Commissioner of Labour, Nizamabad. 2. One CC to Mis. V.K. Naidu, Advocate tOpUCl 3. One CC to Sri M. Bhushan Reddy, Advocate [OpUC] 4. One CC to M/s. K. Ram Chandra Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl 5. Two CD Copies (Along with a Copy of Award of Lok Adatat) ECTION OFFICER and Assistant kam/gh W HIGH COURT DATED:22101t2025 JUDGMENT CMA.No.46 of 2015 (i. ) ( ? c o 1 y{(: tfAr€ 2 B tiB 2[25 a (-O a /,- c 3oarCU *-=:a= THE CMA IS DISPOSED OF IN TERMS OF THE AWARD OF LOK ADALAT *{{o\& : t i I I i i ! BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COAAJIAITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Seclion l9 of lhe tegol SerYlces Authorities Acl, 1987 (Centrol Acl)l ro,s;y,.-, aFRV Present:f. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi, Date:7E-09-?OZ4 q o(J I -lslRsl$ I (Former Judge of High Court for the State of Telangan') Chairman
2. Smt. B. Lakshmi Prasuna, Advocate, Member
Sri Anirudh Nettikonda, Advocate, Member . C.M.A.No.46 of 2015 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST W.C. No. 11 of 2OO9 F (On thb fite of the Commissioner for Emptoyees' Compensation an ' Commissioner of Labour: at Nizamabad) d Assistant BETWEEN: lCtCt t-ornUard General lnsurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Branch Office Opp;- Sri devi talhes, Gandhi Chowk, Nizamabad (Certificate cum poticy issued No. 3008/A/51638143 /00/000 Vatid f rom 23-04-7007 to 27-04 -20081. ...AppellanURespondent No. 2
Putty Sathemma, W/o.Putty Lingaiah @ Putty Sailu, 43 years, Occ: House Hotd R/o BandapatLy Vi[tage of pittam Manda[, Nizamabad District AND ...Respondents/claimants
2. K.mahender, S/o.Chander rao, Aged major, Owner of tractor bearing No'AP 15 v 2885 And traiter Bearing No.AP 15 V 2886 R/o.Venkatapur ViItage, Jaffargadda Mandat, warangal District' ...Respondent/opposite Party No.1 AWARD l.ThisisanappealfitedbytheAppeltant/lnsuranceCompanychallengingtheorder dated08.5.20l4passedinW.C.No.llof200gFbytheCommissionerfor Emptoyees' compensation and fusistant Commissioner of Labour, at Nizamabad. 2. Sri Mohammed aLaut Shabbeer, senior Manager - Legat Ctaims - The Authorized representative of Appettant/ lnsurance Company, has apPeared and represented that the lnsurance Company decided not to Pursue the present appeal and therefore they are withdrawing the appea[. t\ I I ,;ts;\ 1 / 3. The said representation is recorded and the appeat is dismissed zrs withdrawn' confirmingtheorderofthecommissionerforEmptoyees'comF'ensationand Assistant Commissioner of Labour, at Nizamabad' The amount' if any' remaini unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shat[ be deposited by the Insurance Company within one monthfromthe. Jateofreceiptoftheaward, alongwithinterest.
On such deposit the Respondent/Ctaimant(s) is/are permitted to withdraw his/her/theirrespectiveamount/sasPertheawardpassedbyCorrmissionerfor Emptoyees' Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour' at I'lizamabad' 5. ln case, the Parties subsequently come to know about fiting of cros; appeal/cross objection, they, are given tiberty to seek recatl of this Order/Award'
Court fee paid on this appeal sha[[ be refunded'
No costs GEiIEFIAi., It\iSLJiiA t!.rCE rlir:-: r a:)a:E :oca_: ! ( :-i Appettant/ lnsurance ComPanY o. 2t CHAIRfiAN 8* ihrmsen ( MEMBER ( the co ) o h{GH LOK t ltv Slate 1ol m t
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.