The High Court · 2025

8. Dudekula Maruf Ali, S/o Sri.late Rajmohammed, Aged about agiriculture, Rl/o H. No.2-60, kuppanaga r vil lage, j h rasanga m Sangareddy Dist -502246

9. Mohammad Adil Ali, S/o Mohammed Mahboob Ali Aged about 35 business R/o. H.No 19-4-340113/A, kishan bhag, near allah Bhadupura Mandal, Hyderabad-500064 Occ. I I":.i'r

10.E .Moharnmad Azeemuddin, S/o Mohammed Mohinuddin Aged absut 35 years, Oc;c. business Ryo. H.No 19-4-340112, konda reddy guda, kishan bhag, Bhadurpura Mandal, Hyderabad -500064

11. Peer Mohammod, S/o. Khaja shab, Aged about. 45 years, Occ.fg_lculture, R/o. Kuppanagar (V), jharahasangam (M), Sangareddy District.500064 ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction particular one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS d,sclaring the action of the respondents. 5 and 6 of PS Jharasagam interfering in r:ivil litigation upon the influence of political local leader and threatening that file false cases against the petitioners and family members, at the agriculturer land bearing Sy.No, 9411E Adms Ac.0.30,gts situated at Kuppanagar (V), jharasangam (M), sangareddy District on said property the civil matter is pending before Civil Court at Zaheerabad in junior Civil Judge, under OS No.81 1202(l pending on the file of Honble Junior Civil Judge at Zaheerabad ordered Status Quo against respondents in lA.No.291 of 2O2O By illegal manner threatening witlr influence of the political local leaders on the petitioners, is illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents police respondent no.S and 6 not to interfere in civil litigation pertain to the agriculture land bearing Sy.No. 9411E Adms Ac.0.30 gts situated at Kuppanagar (V), Jharasangam(M), Sanga Reddy District and grant. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 ;' : ':":''(- "''; 'ji! l Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents.No.S and 6 and 7 to 11 not to interfere in civil litigation pertain to the at the:-agriculture land bearing Sy.No. 9411E Adms Ac.0.30 gts situated at Kuppanagar,'(V),'''Jharasangam(M), sangareddy (D) Telangarra Pendingdispos;alofthewritpetitionandgrant '- - 1':.s-iiri lr?.=Siti- iitt.-Ef.TiElilh Counsel for th,e Petitionerc : SRI JEEVAN S Counsel for th,e RespondenG No 1 To 6: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for th,e Respondents No 7 To 11: --- '.'., t' illtttt r+,ifl 'l / /\ {': (,1 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.284O4 of 2o.25 This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: .:\ "...declaring tlw action of the respondent Nos.S and 6 of PS Jltarasagam interfering in ciuil litigation upon the influence of political locql leader and threatening that _flle false cases against tle petitioners and. familg members at tlrc agrianlture land beaing Sy.No.94/ lE 'Admeasuing Ac.O-3O gts., situqted at Kuppanagar Village, Jharasangam Mand"al, SangargddA District on said property tlle ciuil matter as pending before Ciuil Court at Za,tteerabad in junior Ciuil Judge under O.S.lVo.8l/ 2O2O pending on the file of Hon'ble Junior Ciuil Judge qt Zqheerabad ordered Status Quo against respondents in 1.A.No.291 of 2O2O bg illegal manner threatening with inJluence of the political local leaders on the petitioners fs illegal, . arbitrary and unconstitutional and uiolation of the Principles of Natural Justtce a"nd ansequentlg direct the respondents police respondenf Nos.S and 6 not to interfere in ciuil litigatton pertain to ttw agriculture lqnd bearing SA.No.94/ 7F,, admeasuring Ac.O-30 gts., situated at Kuppanagar Village, Jhqrasangam Mandal, Sanga Reddg District (subject propertg)..." 2

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on br:half of respondent Nos.1 to 6. With their consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal. Notice to respondent Nos.?' to 11 is dispensed with.

3. The facts of the case in brief are that petitioner claim s to have purchased the subject property from Mahzroof Ali uide registered sale deed bearing Doc.lrlo.277Ll2O1O, subsequently, the name of Smt.Rizya Sulta.na i.e., first petitioner was mutated in the revenue records by MRO and pattadar passbooks has also been issued in favour of petitioners and the petitioners are cultivating the said lands and also erected khadies around the subject land and fenced it. It is submitted that respondent Nos.7 to 11 approached petitioners and destroyed fencing, drilled a pore well. [n that regard, petitioners made a complaint to respondent No.6 Police, treq,r(:ver, respondent No.6 had not received the complaint of the petitioners. Thereafter, on 18.O4.2025, the petitioners lodged a complaint before Circle lnspector i.e., resp<lndent No.S, however, when respondent No.S did not W:t,,'7r n J initiate any action, petitioners lodged complaint before respondent Nos.2 and 3. It is submitted that when the petitioner went to her son's home at G4iularamaraln, respond.ent Nos.7 to 11 removed some of the Khadies and trespassed into petitioners land and destroyed the existing crop. Thereafter, when the petitioners approached respondent No.6 for lodging complaint against respondent Nos.7 to 11, respondent No.6 in collusion with respondent Nos.7 to 11 at the behest of politicians is threatening the petitioners with dire consequences. Questioning the said interference of rrespondent Police in the civil dispute, the present writ petition is filed.

4. The sub-Inspector of Police, Jharasangam Police Station has placed a copy of instructions through learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and would submit that neither the petitioners nor the respondent Nos.7 to 11 had approached respondent Police and lodged complaint. [t is further submitted that respondent authorities are not :.. involving in the civil diqputes pending between petitioners and unoflicial respondent Nos.7 to 1 1. It is further submitted that on 13.06 .2O2O, on the complaint lodged by 4 : first petitioner's son, respondent police registered FIR No-38 /2o2o under Sections 442 , 422 Ipc against resp()ndent No.8 and .thereafter, charge sheet was filed before Junior First Class Magistrat e, Zaheerabad.

5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel on either side, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent authorities to consider the comprlaint of the petitioner dated oz.os.2o25 filed along with material papers of this writ petition and take appropriate action by following due procedure as contemplated under law. Miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, shall stand closerl. However, there shall be no ord.er as to costs. SD/. AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, .:

1. The State Of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Building-s Telangana- 5AO 022.

2. The Director General Of Police, For Telangana State, Lakdi Pool, Police Headquarters, Hyderabad-500004,

3. The sup':rintendent of Police, Sangareddy, sangareddy town Telangana 502001

4. The deputy superintendent Telangarra 502220 of police, Zaheerabad, sangareddy district . .-..r ..;:.r._; . . ,,

5. The Circle lnspector Of Police, P.S hathnoor, jharsangam Mandal, Sangareddy District Telangana 502221

6. The Sub lnspector Of Police, P.S jharsangarn, jharasangam Mandal, W-,,"9 ,r{ f,l/

7. One CC to SRt JEEVAN S Advocate tOpUCl 8. Two ccs to AGp FoR HOME ;High court for the state of relangana, at + Hyderabad. TOUTI :,,

9. Two CD Copies : / I i HIGH COURT DATED:19/09/202s \ \ 'tt-lE s? ( 'rEB zilffi .. . n: -....ilild.jr,!61i,:.;lr.+.ii,{!,irt,.., .,,. rr' t.jr::, ORDER WP.No.28404 of 2025 . .,r.-.-ri :-....--:---,.i:, . v;..; . ;.,. -11i\s:rr:r -ir.,, a,,.*lar,-_i11- -, -: ''^1.1;;1;. 'r1. 'ji. ':rri-:r'1._a: r ! ' .-i. :-: "!, , - . -.; ir :: t.t, - ; . DlS_POS COSTS r;- .-...- .. _.....,.,,,.j-it,l.--:- ... ED OF THE WRIT PETITI tl,t-