✦ High Court of India · 19 Nov 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 19 Nov 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
19 Nov 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,092 words

Sri Devi Baqh Welfare Society, #. 11_5_580, Redhills, Nampally, Hyderabad, Rep. by its General Secretary, k.Varari. - - -' AND ...PETITIONER

2. J-

4. The State of Telanoan-a, B"p. Oy its principal Secretary, Municipal Ad m in istratio n a nd U rbi n oeve tofim Jnl D+",il;;[3"cretariat, Hyderabad, The Greater Hvderabad ttrtrrnicipdr corporifion, n.p, 6v it. commissioner, 0/o cC comptex T-ank Bund Road,'Lower irn['6jhJiirio?raoro r ne ueputy Commissioner, Khairatabad Circle N'o.12, Greater Hyderabad Municjpal Corporation, Hyderabad, The Zonal Commission'er, Khaiiatabad Circle No. 12, Greater_Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hydbrabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particurarry in the nature of Mandamus, decraring the inaction of the respondents in not considering the representations of the petitioner's tempre society for mutating the land in survey Nos' TS No.36 (90 sq- mts) and rs No.30 (r94 sq. mts) in favorof sri Devibagh Temple, as illegar, arbitrary, and viorative of Articres 14 and 300-A of the constitution of rndia and consequenfly direct the respondents to forthwith carry out mutation and correction of rand records, based on the Muntakab and Fasri records, DDLR survey report, court judgment, and Endowment Department endorsements. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the < ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cour may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the representat cns dt.05.0B.ZO2S & 18.08.2025 of the petitioner's temple Society for mutating the land in Survey Nos. TS No, 36 (90 sq, mts) and TS No, 30 (194 sq, mts) in i€vor of Sri Devibagh Temple, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D.KAVAL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MUN|CIPAL l,t )M|NISTRAT|ON AND URBAN DEVELOPMEl\ T Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2to4: SRI MIDDE ARUN liUMAR, The Court made the following: ORDER SC FOR GHMC TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY i WRIT PETITION No.28420 OR 2025 ORDER: (ORAL) This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to declare the action of respondent authorities in not considering its representation dated 05.08.2025 and 13.08.2025 for mutating the land admeasuring 96 square meters and [ 94 square meters in T.S. Nos.36 and 30 in favour of Sri Devi Bagh Temple, as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21,. and 300-4 of the Constitution of India.

2. Heard Mr. D. Kaval Kumar, leamed counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Midde Arun Kumar, leamed standing counsel for the GHMC, appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

3. The case of the petitioner is that Sri Devi Bagh Temple is an ancient place of worship and had been in existence for more than 667 years. The temple was registered under Section 43 of the Telangana Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 1987. As per the Muntakab Kitabul Waqf (Abstract of Endowment), File No.85/2/1335 Fasli (1953 A.D.), 2 the temple is in possession of 2174 square yar<l , which was confirmed through a comprehensive survey con,l rcted by the Department of Land Records (DDLR) in File No \3124812024. The Survey report records the following extents: (i 1554 square meters in T.S. No.3, which comprises of temple cremises and surrounding endowment owned rented houses, ) 90 square meters in T.S. No.36, comprising of endowment pr: terties let out for rent, under the management of the Endowmen Department, (iii) 194 square meters in T.S. No.30 comprises rf open area directly in front of the temple gate, used for relip i )us purposes, congregation of devotees and temple events. Hov ever, in T.S. No.3 it is correctly recorded as 'G-Temple', in T.L No.36, it is wrongly recorded as 'Abadi Land', though structur( s on the land are endowment structures, and in T.S. No.30, Its wrongly recorded as patta land in the name of one Mr. Kashi I rnda Rao S/o. Babu Rao despite no private individual has :ver claimed possession for the past more than thirty (30) years.

4. [t is submitted that representations dated 05 .08.2025 and

13.08.2025 have been submitted by the petitioner - society to 3 I i respondent authorities for correcting revenue records and also for implementing orders passed in I.A. No.687 of 2022 in A.S. No.104 \ of 2020 and I.A. No.504 of 1996 in O.S. No.332 of 1996. As there is inaction on the part of respondent authorities in considering their representation, they are constrained to approach this Court.

5. Learned standing counsel for the GHMC submitted that representation of the petitioner will be considered, and pass orders, in accordance with law.

6. Recording the submissions of the learned standing counsel for the GHMC, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent authorities to consider the representatlon of the petitioner dated 05.08.2025 and 18.08.2025 for mutating land admeasuring 96 square meters and 194 square meters in T.S. Nos.36 and 30 in favour of Sri Devi Bagh Temple, and pass orders, in accordance with law, by issuing notice to the petitioner and all other concemed/interested persons, by affording opportunity of hearing to them, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt ofa copy ofthis order. There shall be no order as to costs. a To, 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applicet ons, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed. SDi - M.OSMAN ALI BAIG AS IJ STANT REGISTRAR /ITRUE COPY// \ecnou oFFlcER \ \ -r-r-lii,"tauio tvlunicipal Corporation, Hyderabad, Deoartment, Secretariat, T.S.,Hyderabad -e*ilrtu,-Hv'ie'qbaq c""mirijiia"l'Bund Ro;d, Lower Tank Band H.yderabz 1 1 The Principal Secrerary, Municipal Ad.ministration and tJ'ban Development fii u n icipa l. co rp' ratio n' 0/o cc , ffsuffiii [.]iIJr, - Circle No 12' ( reater Hvderabad I iX"'5JJri, Cirr*.sio#i, + t'r,i, Z,i"ar-coinmissioher',k-niitiGuaa circle No 12' cr >ater-Hyderabad 5 6#'c61; sfti o.xaVdr- KUMAR Advocate-[oPlJcl 6 rwo ccs to GP ron rrilt'fu'rb]ilAl'AiirrrtNli-riurtoil truo URBAN ? 5;;-c-c16Cr rvrrobe An0ru rurunR, sc FoR GHrv cloPUCl 8. Two CD CoPies DEVELoPMENT ,uisn cluriio;ih;Sqt"-"J141n9?l ' ' Municipal Corporation, Hvderabad' at Hvderabad [oUT] BM PSK HIGH COURT DATED:1911112025 ORDER WP.No.28420 of 2025 HE.3TA Ie I i 3 JAN 2026 '-':, o C * DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ,v)\

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments