Per Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice) Sri v. Yadu Krishna Sainath

Petition u ndel Section 151 CPC praying that in the circurnst.ances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court rna1, be pleased to suspend the intpugred Order Dt.2'1 .O9.2020 issued by the respondent no.2 in favour of the rer;ponCent no.5, pending disposal of the above writ l.retition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI V. YADU KRISHNA SATNATH Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI KATRAVATH SHANKAR., AGP REPRESENTING SRI VEERASWAMY GADDAM, GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.3 & 4: SRI MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM, GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent No.S: Ms. B. RACHANA REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL REPRESENTING SRI MOHD. BASEER RIYAZ The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT PETITION No.379O4 of 2o22 ORDER: (Per Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice) Sri V. Yadu Krishna Sainath, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Katravath Shankar, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing Sri Veeraswamy Gaddam, learned Government Pleader for General Administration Department, for respondent No.1; Sri Muralidhar Reddy Katram, learned Government Pleader for Revenue Department, for respondent Nos.3 and 4 and Ms. B. Rachana Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Mohd Baseer Riyaz learned counsel for t I respondent No.5.

2. With consent finally heard. , $

3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties have jointly agreed that this petition may be disposed of in terms of order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.Nos.58O1 and 37820 of 2022, dated 31.12.2024. It is agreed that in view of the aforesaid common order, the impugned order of Lokayukta, dated 21.09.2020 rnay be set aside and the parties may be directed to proceed in accordance with the directions 2 passed by the learned Single Judge in the aforesa id common order.

4. In vier,r' o' the consensus arrived at, the in-rpugrred order of the Lokaytrkta, dated 21.O9.2O2O is set aside bfid parlies shall be governed by thi, aforesaid common order passed by the learned Single JudEe.

5. With the :rbove and without expressing any' vir:u,s on the merits of tl're matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no ordr:r' as to costs. Miscellaneous applicatio ns, if any, pending shal1 sr,:rnd closed. 1l To, //TRUE COPY// 1 The Princtoal Secretary, General Administration Telangan,l.'Se cretariat Birildings, Hyderabad SDi.K.AMMAJI PUTY REGTSTRAR qE ., I SEcTION OFFICER Departrnent, State of

2.TheRegistrarHon'bleLokayuktafortheStateof.Telangarra,H'No.5-4-49, Basheerbag, l-lvderabad

3. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District 4. The Tahsildar, BalapurMandal, Ranga Reddy District 5. One CC tc SRI V. YADU KRISHNA SAINATH, Advocate [CrPt'C] 6. TWO CCS tO S}RI VEERASWAI\i1Y GADDAM, GP fOT GCNT:TAI AdMiNiStTAtiON' - ff igh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad lOUTl T.TwoCCs,to:SRlI\IURALIDHARREDDYKATRAI4GPfoTRevenue'High Court for the Sitate of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 8. One CC to SFll MOHD. BASEER RIYAZ, Advocate [OPUCI 9. Two CD (lopit:s MP LS HIGH COURT DATED:21 10412025 4:: : lYr E $TA TA: ,,- ) 2 ? 'f:'i ?i25 J \\l '-i irr^, , '..' - ORDER WP.No.37904 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \') 1::----