✦ Telangana High Court

S.Yas na N a fav v. The State of Telangana

4 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. In view of the submissions made by both sides and in view of the dismissal of W.p.No.19106 of 2OlO on 28.05.2025, the interim order passed by this Court on 03.11.2023 is made absolute. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

Judgment

Cause title

THE HONOURABLE SRI STICE K. SARATH

WRIT PETITION NO: 0585 0F 2023 Between: S.Yas na N a fav m oyee E p o H Malkajgiri District a na Sa rma S o a e S No I 1 5 3 S re e n o Krishnaiah Aged 78 years occ. Rtd. HMT Nagar, Nacharam, Medchal ...PETITIONER

AND 1 2 The State of Telangana, Rep. by Princi Registration Department Secret'ariat, H I Secretary, Stamps and erabad. The District Registrar, Stamps and Ass Nampally, Hyderabad. rance, Hyderabad District at

3. The Sub Registrar, Bowenpally, Secund rabad ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Con circumstances stated in the affidavit filed the to issue a writ order or direction more parti Mandamus, declaring the action of the respo the Settlement Deed/Gift Settlement Deed in Plot no.B9 SCB no.5-20-012 in the Sanction GLR no. 396, admeasuring 300 sq. yards Threemurthy weaker section, Mahendra Hill Cantonment (PTIN No. PT05F82314BB) Te violative of principles of natural justice and vi Constitution of lndia and consequen y dire entertain the Settlement Deed/Gift Setflement over the above mentioned property and releas titution of lndia praying that in the th, the High Court may be pleased ularly, one in the nature of Writ of dent nos.2 and 3 in not entertaining spect of the property i.e. house on d Layout of Sy.no. 74112 or part of or 250.80 sq. meters, situated at , East Marredpally, Secunderabad ngana State as illegal, arbitrary, lative of Arts. 1 4, 21 and 300-4 of the respondent nos.2 and 3 to eed and to give effect registration the document lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the igh Court may be pleased to direct the respondent nos.2 and 3 to receive and register the Settlement Deed/Gift Settlement Deed that may be presented by the petitioner in respect of the property i'e. house on Plot no.89 SCB no.5-20-012 in the Sanctioned Layout of sy.no.74t12 or part of GLR no. 396, admeasuring 300 sq. yards or 25O.BO sq. meteis, situated at Threemurthy weaker s"9tloj, Mahendra Hilis, East Marredpaily, SecunOeraOaa cantonment (PTrN No. prosFB2314BB) Terangana State, pending oisposrioi tne above writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M V HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR STAMpS AND REGISTRATION The Court made the following: ORDER 7 THE HONOURABLE S JUSTTCE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION N .30585 of 2023

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel fo the petitioner ald learned Assistant Government Pl ader for Stamps and Registration appearing for th respondents and perused the material on record

2.

Learned counsel for the p tioner submits that at the time of admission, this Cou granted interim order on

03.1I.2023 directing the egistering Authorities to receive and register the do ent presented by the petitioners if it is otherwise und to be in compliance with the requirements of the gistration Act, 1908, and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

3.

Today, when the matter s taken up for hearing, Iearned counsel for the pet oners submits that in pursuance to the interim orde passed by this Court on

03.11.2023, the Registering A thorities have registered the subject document. a SI(, J W.P.No.3OSaS oJ' 2023 1 I

4.

Learned Counsel for both sides submits that the connected matter in W.p.No.19106 of 2O1O filed by the State Government against the order in LGC.No. 167 of 1997 passed by the Special Court under the A.p. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, Hyderabad, was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court on 28.O5.202s

Operative part

5.

In view of the submissions made by both sides and in view of the dismissal of W.p.No.19106 of 2OlO on 28.05.2025, the interim order passed by this Court on 03.11.2023 is made absolute. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

6.

It is made clear that mere registration of the document does not confer title on the subject property and it is a.[so made clear that this order would not have any bearing on all those matters where title/rights of the parties are pending before the authorities either in revision/appeals for adjudication and in any other case order also does not preclude the parties in asserting _.this l- sr, J [/.P.rYo.30585 of 2023 their rights before a competent ourt of law. There shall be no order as to costs.

7.

Miscellaneous Petitions, if y, pending in this writ petition shali stand closed. //TRUE COPY I ot K.BHAVANt SWAMY STANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1.

The Principal Secretary, Stamps and Regi Hyderabad.

2. The District Registrar, Stamps and Assura NamPallY, HYderabad.

3. The Sub Registrar, Bowenpally, Secunde 4. One CC to SRl. M V HANUMANTHA RA Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS AND RE State of Telangana. [OUT] ration D artment Secretariat, ce, Hyderabad District at bad. Advocate [OPUC] ISTRATION ,High Court for the Two CD CoPies b KKS LS HIGH GOURT DATED:1310612025 _---:-':: - - t;,- :; ' ra lcl -a': ..,'i'u''' (L iJ J ,.) 1r [lJE 20[ : ORDER WP.No.30585 of 2023 2/ tt, .i-. - \ ri .i/ DISPOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS -(

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151; Indian Stamp Act, 1899; A.p. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments