Yelamakanti Yadagiri v. 1. The State of Telangana

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lrlandamus, Declaring the inaction of respondent Nos.2 to 4 in considering the application vide Ref No.2500116215 dated 2510812025 made in TN/33 module on Bhu Bharati Portal for updating and restoring the missing survey number and extent in respect of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.1 .1'1 Gts. in Sy. No. 70, situated at. Gurajala Village, Shaligouraram lVIandal, Nalgonda District, is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of provisions of the Telangana Bhu Bharati (Record of Rights in Land) Act,2O24 and the rules made thereunder apart from violative of Article 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia, Consequently to direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to update and restore the missing survey number and land extent related to the subject property in accordance with law. l.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to act upon and consider the application vide Ref No.2500116215 dated 2510812025 made in TI\/33 module on Bhu Bharati Portal for updating and restoring the missing survey number and land extent in respect of the Subject Property pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI R.S.SUMITH RAJ Counsel for the Respondents : SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER .@,'.l]W .a . r./ ,.r THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE IC LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.28015 of 2025 ORAL ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

2. The Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.l-l l guntas in Sy.No.70, situated at Gurajala Village, Shaligouraram Mandal, Nalgonda District. He is also owner of the land in other survey numbers of the very same village. The said land is missing in the Bhu Bharati portal. He is not in possession of the said property, He has filed a suit in O.S. No.136 of 2024 on the flrle of the Junior Civil Judge, Nakrekal, against Sri Chatla Venkanna and seven others, seeking recovery of possession and grant of perpetual injunction in respect of the said property. The said suit is pending and there are no interim orders.

3. lt is the specific contention of the petitioner that the subject land is missing in the Bhu Bharati portal. Accordingly, he has sub,raitted an online application bearing No.2500116215, dated Y!.ri."!ffii. -! Y. ::...:'. \,r'' 2 -t-

25.08.2025, to respondent No.2, with a request to include the said property in the Bhu Bharati portal. Despite receiving and acknowledg:ng the said online application, respondent No.2 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.2, the present writ petition is filed.

4. Whercas. the leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that during the pendency of the aforesaid suit, the petitioner cannot seek to include the subject propefty in the Bhu Bharati portal. The petitioner has to pursue the said suit and thereafter has to approach respondent No.2 by submitting the online application. However, having received the said online appJication along with a fee of Rs.45l-, respondent No.2 ought to have informed the petitioner the said fact, instead of keeping it pending.

5. As di-scussed supla, the name of the petitioner in respect of the aforesaid land is mentioned in both the old and the latest passbooks and title deed. It is the specihc contention of the petitioner that he is not in possession of the said property, and therefore, he has filed the aforesaid suit seeking recovery of :.IW'',rtt 3 possession and grant of perpetual injunction. However, it is for respondent No.2 to consider the said aspects

6. ln the light of the aforesaid discussion, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 to consider the online application bearing No.25001 16215, dated 25.48.2025, submitted by the petitioner, and dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law by putting the petitioner and the defendants in O.S No. 136 of 2024, on the f,le of the Junior Civil Judge, Nakrekal, on notice and affording them an opportunity. If respondent No.2 is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall pass orders assigning specific reasons and communicate a copy of the same to the petitioner. He shall complete the entire exercise within a period of sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR i I SECTION OFFICER c tariat Buildings, State of

1. The Principat Secretary, Revenue Department, S nda District. cer, Nalgonda Division, Nalgonda District., Telangana at Hyderabad. The District Collector, Nalgo The Revenue Divisional Off i The Tahsildar, Shaligouraram Mandal, Nalgonda District' r*o cti to cp ro{ REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] Ohe CC to SRt RS.SUttrtlTH RAJ, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD CoPies To 2 3 4 5 6 7 SA PVL .. 'rlr-:r-.- ---ii1ta: -:- *.?.'.attttt'a---*.r?trr'!3t"-'*"ttrt!a*Fa_7+ 1':.i a1l1ltx a-: * .'' '-r'tt1:.'1.a],:_ '\. ? E .,ctP 20tr ,/: I !. \ HIGH COURT DATED:1710912025 ORDER WP.No.28015 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.