The High Court · 2025
Case Details
Sri K.V.Subba Reddy, S/o Late Jala reddy, Age 60 years, Occ. Advocate, R/o H.No.10-02-3181141A, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad - 500 057 ...PETITIONER AND Department, Secretariat Build ings, Hyd erabad
1. The State of Telangana , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue 2. The District Collector, Nalgonda District 3. The SpecialTribunal, Repl by its [Vlember-cum-Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District Colony, Rep. by its Secietary, tttliryalaguda, Nalgonda District
4. The Joint Collector, Nalgonda District 5. The Revenue Divisional-Officer, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District O. The Tahasildar-cum-Sub-Registrar,'Miri!alaguda Mandal, Nalgonda.District 7. Venkateswara Housing Residence Welfare Association, Venkateswara B. Paraniboiria @ UmurthiYellaiah, Slo Venkaiah, Age 75 years, Occ. Agriculture, Ga-ndhi Nagar, Near tVaisamma Temple, Miryalaguda Town, Nilgonda District g. Ban"tu Lingamma, wo Ramulu, Age 45 ye?F, occ_. Household, R/o Dacharam Village, (Dubbagudem ), Nered ucherla fr4andal, Suryapet District l0.PadisanaboinaManlammai W/o' ft/uthaiah, Fl/o tMiryalaguda Town. and 11. Padisanaboi"na Srinivas, S/o Pedalachaiah R/o lvliryalaguda Town and l2.Padisanaboi-naYadagiri, S/o China Muthaiah Rl/o [Viryalaguda Town and 13. padisanaboiira Rambabu, S/o China tr/uthaiah R/o ttliryalaguda Town and lvlandal, Nalgonda District Mandal, Nalgonda District [\Iandal, Nalgonda District Mandal, Nalgonda District Nalgonda District t +. piOisanaboina Chiranjeevi, S/o Venkaiah R/o Miryalaguda Town and [t/landal, l5.PadjsanaboinaRamu, S/o Venkaiah R/o Miryalaguda Town and [Vlandal, 16. PadjsanaboinaPapaiah, S/o PedaLachaiah Fl/o Miryalaguda Town and Nalgonda District Mandal, Nalgonda District lttlandal, Nalgonda District
17. Padisanaboiira Ramulamma, W/o Rama Swamy R/o tt/iryalaguda Town and
18. PadisanaOoiira Rambabu, S/o Bixam R/o tMiryalaguda Town and ft/andal, Nalgonda District (Relpondent Nos.10 to 18 are no way concerned in the Writ petition, since iney'are pertaining to other branch, hence not necessary party) ...RESPONDENTS I I JL i Petitiorr under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancer; stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI, calling for records pertaining to the new Case No.F2lSpecial TribunallO3Oll 2021 dated 22,01.2021, which is subsequently upheld by tlre order dated 06.o7.2021 passed by the 3'd respondent, consequently set aside the same and release the petitioners Vendors land to an extent of Ac.li.08 gts. in Survey No.70/AA2 situated at tMiryalaguda Village and [\/andal, Nalgtlnda District, which is no way concerned to the adjudication before the R.D.O., Miiryalaguda vide File No.E/1689/2014 dated 29.O7.2014 merged in the Special --ribunal, which is arbitrary, illegal, without application of mind, irrational, contrary to the T.S. Rights on Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971, unconstitutional, violation of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia, and alsrt without jurisdiction, consequently direct the District Collector,2nd respondent arld 6th respondent to incorporate the name of the petitioner as a pattadar, purchaser of the property by way of Regd. sale deed vide doc. No.3137 of 2015 datec 22.O5.2015 before S.R.O., Miryalaguda and mutate the name of the petitionelrrrithout reference to any of the proceedings handled by the Special Tribunal, since the petitloner Vendor name has shown as a pattadar vide Account No.2ll02 in respect of the land as stated supra, in the interest of justice lA NO: 2 OF 21 22 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent, District Collector to entertain the petitioner application for mutation afresh in respect of land in Sy.No.7OlAA2 to an extent of Ac.3.0g gts., situated e,t [/liryalaguda Village and lr/andal, Nalgonda District, based on the Regd. sale de,-'ds vide doc. No.3137 of 2015 dated 22.O5.2015 in the interest of justice lA NO: 3 oF 2022 petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 6th respondent not to entertain any document in respect of the land of the petitioner covered by Sy.No.70/AA2 to an extent of Ac.3.0B gts. situated at Miryalaguda Village and tMandal, Nalgonda District, which was purchased by way of Regd. sale deed No.31 37 of 2015 dated 22.05.2015 by any way or any mode in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KURITI BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to5: AGP FOR REVENUE Counselfor the Respondent Nos. 6to18: - The Court made the following: ORDER -.:-i--:-,--- -.,----:.:1.-,-.:l:E:- -^= .-.t. .-j j THE HOIIOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.37649 of 2o22 ORDER: This rvrit petition is filed seeking the following prayer: " ...to issrre a uit or order or direction more particularly one i,t the nature of Wit of Certiorari calling for records pertainingl to the neru Case No'F2/ Special Tribunal/ -0305/2021, dated 22.01-2O21 which is subsequently uphetd bg the order dated 06.07.2021 passed by the 3'd respc,nTertt consequently set aside the sa.me and relZase the petitioners Vend.ors land to an extent of Ac.3.0B gts in Suruey No.70/ AA2, situated at Miryolagud"a Villaqe and Mandal, Nalgonda District, whi.c,:t ii no wall concemed to the adjudication before the R.D.O, Mirya.lagudct uide File No.E/ 1689/ 2014, d.atetl2g.O7.2014, mergeci in the Special Tribunal which is arbitrary, illegal, tuithout application of mind, irratitnal, cttntrary to the T.S. Rights on Land and Pattad.ar Pcrss Books Act, 1971, unconstitutional, uiolalion of Article 14 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India ancl also without jurisdiction, consequently direct the District Collector-2"'t respondent and 6n respondent to in':orporate the name of the petitioner as a pattadar pur"troi., of the property by way of Regd sale de-ed -uid"e d.oc. I[o.3] 37 of 2015, dated 22.05.2015, before S.R.O, Miryalaguda and mutate the name of the petittoner without reference to any of the proceedings hanct.led by the Special Tribunal since the petitioner Venc|or name has shown as a pattadar uide Account No.2202 in respect of the land as stated supra in the inter zst of justice. . . "
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing,'learned counsel for the petitioner \t/ould fairly submit that as against the order l)assed by the learned V Additional District Judge at Miryala13uda, Nalgonda District in O.S. No.3O of 2O16, an appeal ha:; been filed by the petitioner uide A.S. No.245 of \ \ \ 2 2022 and it is pending for adjudication before the Hon',ble Division Bench of this court and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present r,vrit petition with a liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedies in accordance with
3. Learned. Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue takes no objection
4. Permission is accorded
5. Accord.ingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a tiberty as prayed for. As a seque!, miscellaneous applications if any, stands closed To, *SD/-C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR6 SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPYII
1. One CC to SRl. KURITI BHASKARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies BMtt Et :'P-E:="; /: -.. 4 '€ HIGH COURT DATED i2',610912025 I ]. 1\ fJ -k 1 6 t'{:8 2026 * ORDER WP.No.3'7649 of 2022 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS @w['o \