High Court · 2025

' y,fl8I #:yi:;#i,yn5ili[:B,t%::,,.fl?:yl,3ln#:,3,#o s eetha m peta 2. Golla Vaishnavi. D/o. Golla Rama Krishna age years 20 years, R:/o. Konderu village, Yerrava ili ma ndar,,rogrtir ol G;dirlY"oi'.tr,.t, Terangana state. - ru' " 3. Porla Partha Sarathi Reddy,, S/o. p.Raghavendra Reddv. ,J ,"rr" 1o vpar<, E"rrr*; it :.ffi BIi: fl ffi $rJ 4. Ravuri Harshita. D/o R.Venkata Vara prasad Aged about 19 years, Rl/o. Patvancha (v) and (M), eaoiaorikothlb;ri.,i"5ltri.t, Tetansana State. 5. Surity Sanvitha Gavathri,, D/o. S.Venugopal Aged about .lg years, Rl/o. parvancha (v) and (M), eaoraorixotrilriEii'6i"iii.t, rJI"gl.;sirt".",' " " 6 K Divya sree. D/o. K chinnaMaddireti, age years 20 years, R70. Kuravaoari Ieeza mandat, Jogutamba ciorr"ioiii'rliiJir?drn" strt" 7. Asapu Guru Naoa Sri Gargi,, D/o. Somasekhar Aged about 21 years, Rl/o. Kukatapily, Hyo#abao, rei#g;" staj;. "*''"'' 8. Pingili Prashanth. S/o . p Ganesh, Aged about 19 years, Rl/o. pocharam 9. Vuke Vashista Akshay, S/o. V.R-ama Murthy, Aged about 19 years, Rt/o. virage, Eiivvar* n tiriarr,"iliii'io6ooaoao District, Terangana 10. Bheeagonisrivibha.. D/o.,B.Naveen Kumar. Aged about 1g years, R/o. District, Tetangana 11.R,Kavitha, D/o. R. peddaial,. Aged about 20 years, Rl/o. leeja viilage and l2. Rudrakshara Laxmi, Dio. sriramuru Aged about 20 years, Rl/o. reeia viilaoe 't 3. voota shiva Naoa sai Srinivas,. S/o. V.chakravarthi Aged about 1g vears. viitase and rvtanbat,-rvreoiiilil'rr;rir,u;rsirt District, Tetaisani vittage, Garta Mandal, tuana-ooouitjao'"oijriEi?Jrrngana State. euieteshapur vi,ajb, Raghuna*rifiifi t\,i;;i;i, 'Wrarangat and Manclal, Jogulamba Gadwal Oistridt, fefangina State. Mandat, Jogutamba Gadwat oistrtti, fefangrii 6ir,u. $gthaoudem Y,:i".n"u.u* -@r / :&. -it:''' ., .,. vears R/o Kothagudem l4.Banothu lvlanasa, D/o. B Krishna n.gg9 .gboy.L]9 village Kothaguoern tvtaniai iiii"it'a?hotn"gudem 6istrict Telangana state' 15.SK.Ativa Kowsar. S/o Zakir Amil Aged about.19^years' R/o Sathupalli village '" ;ililfi,i;I,-xr,rhhrm District. Telangana state D No 6-2- l6.Gundra rhanishka,. o'9,,"onr",:3'ff',llo$:3:o'?""r;j"?:l"r'5';,Et 639/5, Chintalabasthi' Kt lT.Vellanki Gracy Keerthana' D/o Venkata. Krishna.Rao Aqed about 19 years' R/o Palvancha village aft ili"'iali' e['? t'd ri Kothaguderi District Telangana .1u ir'r.rnn, Sree Satyavathi" D/o Y Ravingl.g P'b" Aoed about 19 years' R/o. Palvancha virr'ge a'n?'Niln,"ji' ehadraorirothagudeir District Telangana State. 19,Kakaralvlanasvi,D/o.1(VighneswaraRao,Agedabout,lByears,R/o. '" 's R'N;g;;, Hyderabad, Telangana state' 20. Godisela Lausyaa D/o Venkatasrygmi . nqej about 1B years R/o' D ubbagudem vittage n;Iipeiili'"0 Ji rt'r"hi wai Drstrict Telangana State vears' R/o Marrikunta 21 Cherala Akhila. D/o Ch Anjineyulu Ag-e.d alogt ,20 village wanapartr i ruano'ai'riva"n'aill.t'iUiitti"t Telanqana State' Z2.Pulta Poojitha, D/o.P Jagaannadha Rao .fqgd about 18 years' R/o' Bad rachalam virrage anii;5li'[ e'i'oiitii Koihag udem District' Telan g ana State. f ,9 2jPljoasana,D/o.RamaKrishna^agedaboutlgyears'Rio,Khammamvillage -" kf,ui,.*j. Mandal Telangana State' 24.Ravapudi Harshita, D/o Rayapudi Radhakrishna Aged about 1B years '- ij.6 r[ut.oa, r'tetat<onaipariifu dnoat' Khammam District 25. Uvvala Uma, D/o. Rambabu, aged about 20 years, R/o,Kalluru village and -- ttrt'ahOat, Khammam District 26 Onapakala Harini p/o OnapakalaBalrai'.' 4S:d about 19 years' R/o' PakiiuoaddaJanq"o' ;li'g""''Hfi';'ip'Jiv H't''"oit Jayashankar Bhupalpattv Telang?na State years R/o Desya Thanda tt't"ha6ubabad District Telangana 27 GangavathCharandesh ' S/o Ramesh ngq . '"'Jg"'ltu|.rl"rt/l'iiiali] 6-507, Ramnas"r. rtr,r.vlrilill'ri"igi;J'--Dittiici' reiangana state Chinna Kisapu|.,* State. Basthi Kothag uo"* ut'Xo"'ao'ii<"tiid'i"'i oistrict Telangan a state

28. Gorrella Roshini, D/o- G Srinivasa Rao Aged about 19 vears' R/o Ganesh 29. Sistla Dhatrini, D/o S tt/ladhava Chaitanya Aged about 18 years' R/o' '- EJriiirp"i, Hvileraoad, Telangana state 30.Bandaru Manvitha, D/o Bandaru Venkata Prasari Aoed about 19 years Rio' 31.T Niba Fatima,, D/o Abbas T Hassan Aged about 19 years' Rlo 14-152' "' i;llffi ,' riii Jn-i' vrlnoat, Khammam District' 32 Bellamkonda Hamstka,, D/o B sambasiuq R19 Aoed about '18 years' R/o 5- 350/17D, Rathinasai" #rC 6;;;;'nd' bhou"tappal' Yadadri-Bhuvansrrr District, Telangana State ' 33.Pawar Nitish, Sio Bhagwandas' Aged about '19 years' R/o Vanasthalipuram "" hil;y;til;;s,i. R'ns ReddY Distirct 34.Y Chaitra sal, D/oy Raghu Aged qU.gqt. Jg years' R/o'shanthi Nagar' -- wrilj.i"jri i.lairoir, Lbgutamba Gadwal district l l.rI AND 1 Z 3 4 ...PETITIONERS HlH:."l',ilj\ii lif;,i"!lr?:!!"6?31 tvrin iskv of H ea |th a n d Fa m i Iv werfa re, 3il:'J.i5ig1?]-,t3*o6:h ??Blil (HE), Ministry or Education, 10e-c, The State of Telanoana Rep by its principal Secretary, Health, Itiledical and Fam ily Welfare De[a rtment, se6retariat, fiyO"i,Or"Jl',' Kaloji Narayana Rao Universily of Health Sciences. lKNRUHS).Rep.by its Registra r, Nizampu ra. wara n g'ai ieL;;;;;:""*"' "'''' ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ or direction particurarry in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,A). To decrare the notification issued by the 4th respondent for admission into MBBS and BDS courses under competent authority quota for the academic year 2025-26 in to medicar and dentar coreges affiriated to KNRUHS in the state of rerangana, cited 15.7.202s to the extent of insisting the petitioners to fulfil the provisions under G,o.Ms.No.33, dated 19.7.2024 and G O MS. NO. 150 dated. 08.09.2025 0f the 3rd respondent for admissions for admission into MBBS and BDS courses under comperent authority quota for the academic year 2o2s-26 in to medicar and dentar coileges affiriated to KNRUHS in the state of rerangana as iflegar, void, arbitrary, inoperative and in vioration of the mandatory directions issued by the Hon'bre supreme court of rndia in slp (c) No 21536-21588 of 2024 (at page no.28, para No. 32) in viewof the fact that tie rules made in G.O.Ms.No.33, dated 19.07.2024 and G.O.tVts. No. 150 dated. 08 09 '2025 of the 3rd respondent was not inexistence by the time the petitioners completed the quarifying the examination of intermediate course that is prior to issuance of the said G-os.B). consequenry, to direct the respondents to consider the cases of the writ petitioners for admission into MBBS and BDS courses under competent authority quota for the academic year 2025-2o26 into medicar and dental colleges affiriated to KNRUHS in the state of rerangana by apprying Rure 3 (iii) (c) of the Rures, 2017 framed under G.o.Ms.No.114, dated 05.o7.20.r7, on the file of the 3rd respondent and pass such other order or orders as this Hon,ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. c )To decrare G,O. Ms. No. '1 50 dated 08-09-2025 on the file of 3rd respondent as illegal' void' arbitrary and irrational and also contrary to the directions issued by the Hon'ble SupremecourtoflndiainSLP(C)21536-21588andothersdated.01-09.20251o the extent of not considering the domicile/residence in right perspective while issuing the said G.O IA NO:1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighcourtmaybepleasedto direct the respondents to consider the cases of the writ petitioners for admission into tr/IBBS and BDS courses under competent authority quota for the academic year2025-2026intomedicalanddentalCollegesaffiliatedtoKNRUHSinthe State of Telangana by applying Rule 3 (iii) (c) of the Rules' 2017 framed under G O.tVls.No.1'14, dated 57 2017 ' on the file of the 3rd respondent' pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V.R.AVULA, rep., SRI SUBBA RAo PoSANI Counsel for the Respondents No'1&2 : SRI K'L'N'RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No'3 : SRI K'SWAPNA MADHURI' AGP FOR HEALTH, MEDICAL & FAMILY WEL Counsel for the ResPondent No'4 : SRI T.SHARATH, SC FOR KNRUHS W.P.No 28076 0F 2025 Between: Aged 1 Kanaoarla Sri Sai Dharma Koushik, Sio Kanaqjrrla Venkateswara -Rao' ' ffi;;i"i6;;r*: ffi st;;;;i, R/'' HNo "7-el7/e' Road No 3' -Parvathi i,irgrl F!"iiioigrdil uipit Depoi. rueaapaili Mandal. Medchal Malkajgiri District 2. Vengalaraju Harsha Vardhan Raju,^ S/o ,Srhivasas Rgju. Aged About l9 vears. occ. student il1"-."ii.rrr".'t'o-1o71813, tCRtsAT-Colohy, Phase -ll, blEra.gro, Ameenpur, Sangareddy, District 3. Omar Farooq, S/o. tvlohammed Hashim Farooky, Aged about lB years' Occ' student R/o. H. r.ro: b-i-Jiigi38, ptot 38,'Lan-e Arvind Nagar colony, Towlichoki, HYderabad. 4, Golla Subhash, S/o Golla Ravi K-umar' Aged about l8 years' Occ gtudent R/o rvne -2 Block sg. 6ii Nl". 782, Gc CRPF, Ranga ndody Klpra Mandal' iawaninagar. p0. JJ Nagar colony, District Medchal Malkalgrrr, lelangana. 5 AND

1. 2 3 4 is,:x?,5":B3li:iy6#?"fl .^H!:sil"o?:ffi a*F::g",1;1f"1.,f,8:,;,tr; ...PETITIONERS HilH: ""l'[jfl ,i"^%*rr,:]r?::131?i M i n istry or Hea |th a n d Fam i ry werra re, 3[:"J|.lll*1?X,i8,,f#t|;,:?Bbil (H E), M i n istrv or Ed ucation, 1 oe-c, HifJt%fl r's:3:;3;"x?,s3x.[il::i"li,x"::3:T" Hea,th, Medica, and Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences (KNRUHS), Rep.by its Hegrstrar, Nizampura, Warang'al, ru6idl"r'."""vr \I'r, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ or direction particurarry in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ to decrare the notification issued by the 4th respondent for admission into MBBS and BDS courses under competent authority quota for the academic year 2025-26 in to medicar and dentar coreges affiriated to KNRUHS in the State of rerangana, dated 15-7 -2025 to the extent of insisting the petitioners to furfir the provisions under G.o.Ms.No.33, dated 19.7.2024 and G.o.MS. No. 150 dated' 08 0g 2025 0f the 3rd respondent for admissions for admission into rvrBBS and BDS courses under competent authority quota for the academic year 2025-26 in to medicar and dentar coreges affiriated to KNRUHs in the state of rerangana as tllegal, void, arbitrary, inoperative and in violation of the mandatory directions issued by the Honbre at supreme court of rndia in slp (c) No. 21536-21 588 of 2024 (at page no. 29, para No. 32) in view of the fact that the rures made in G O Ms No.33, dated r9-07.2024 and G.o.Ms. No. 150 dated. 08.09.2025 0f the 3rd respondent was not in existence by the time the petitioners compreted the qualifying the examination of intermediate course that is prior to issuance of the said G os.B) consequenfly, to direct the respondents to consider the cases of the writ petitioners for admission into MBBS and BDS courses under competent authority quota for the academic year 2025-2026 into medicar and dental colleges affiliated to KNRUHS in the State of Telangana by apptying Rule 3 (iii) (c)of the l, tr. ,tj Rules, 2017 framed under G O.Ms.No 114, dated 05 07 2017 ' on the file of the 3rd respondent and passsuch other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case C) To declare G O lvls No l50 dated 08-09-2025 on the file of 3rd respondent as illegal, void, arbitrary and irrational and also contrary to the directions issued by the Hon'ble supreme court oflndiainSLP(C)21536-215BBandothersdated.01.09.2025totheextentofnot consideringthedomicile/residenceinrightperspectivewhileissuingthesaidG,o IA NO: 1 OF 2025 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To directtherespondentstoConSiderthecasesoftheWritpetitionersforadmission intotvlBBsandBDScoursesundercompetentauthorityquotafortheacademic year2025-2026intomedicalanddentalcollegesaffiliatedtoKNRUHSinthe State of Telangana by applying Rule 3 (iii) (c) of the Rules' 20'17 framed under the file of the 3rd respondent, pending G.O.Ms No.114, dated 5.7 2017, on disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI VISHAL MAHARANA Counsel for the Respondents No.1&2 : SRI K'L'N'RAGHAVENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.3 : SRI K'SWAPNA MAOHURI' AGP FOR HEALTH, MEDICAL & FAMILY WEL Counsel for the ResPondent No.4 : SRI T.SHARATH, SC FOR KNRUHS The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JTISTICE SRI H KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M .MOHII'DDIN WRIT PETITION Nos2792 5 and 28 076 of 2O2S COMMON ORDER: Learned Senior Counsel Sri V.R.Avula, representing learned counsel Sri posani Subba Rao ald learned counsel Sri Vishal Maharana, appears for the petitioners. Learned counsel Sri K.L.N.Raghavendra Reddy appears for respondents No.l and 2. Ms. K.Swapna Madhuri, learned Assistant Government pleader for Heaith, Medical and Family Welfare Department, appears for respondent No.3. Sri T. Sharath, learned Starding Counsel for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences (hereinafter referred to as, "the University,,), appears for respondent No.4.

2. The petitioners in both the writ petitions pray for the following reliet 2 'For the reasons stated in the accompanytng aft-rdavit lhat llris Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction particularly in the nature of ma:rdamus or any ot her aPProPriate writ ' To de clare the nor'ihcation issued by the 4*' A). respondent for admission into MBBS and BDS courses under competent authority quota for the academic year 2025-26 into medical & dental colleges afirliated to KNRUHS in tlre State of Telangana, dated' l5'7 2025 to the extent of insisting the petiLioners to fu1fil the provisions under G.O.Ms.No.33, dated, lg.7 2024 a-nd G O Ms No l50 datcd: 08.O9.2025 of the 3'd respondent for adrnission iato MBBS arld BDS courses unc{er competent authority quota for the academic yeat 2025'26 into medical and de ntal colleges afhliated to KNRUHS in the State of Telar-rgana as illegal' void, arbitrar5r, inoperative and rn violatron of the mandatory directions issued by the I{onble Supreme Court of India in SLP (C) No.21536-21588 of 2024 at (pagc no 28' Para No.Si1 in vi.ew of the fact that the lules made in c.o.Ms.No.33, dated 19.07.20221 and G'o'Ms No l50 dated: O8.O}.2O25 of the 3'd respondent was no+' in existence by the time the petitioners completed the qualifying the examination of intermediate course that is prior to issuance of the said G.Os. Consequently to <lirect the respondents to consider B). the cases of the writ petitioners for admission into MBBS and BDS courses under competent authority quota for the academic year 2025-2C.26 into medical & dental colleges affrliated to KNRUHS in the State of Telangana by applying Rule 3(iii)(c) of the Rules, 2077 framed under G.O.Ms.No. 1 14, dated 05.07.2017 , on the file of the 3'd respondent and pass such other order or orders as t1.is 3 Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstarces of the case. C). To declare G.O.Ms.No.150 dated O8.09.2025 on the hle of 3.a respondent as illegal, void, arbitrary and irrational and a-lso contra,r5r to the directions issued by the Hontrle Supreme Court of India in SLp (C) 21536-21-58g and others dated: 01.09.2025 to the extent of not considering the domicile/residence in right perspective while issuing the said G.O and pass such other order or orders as this Hontrle Court may deern fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.,,

3. The grievance of the petitioners is that being the residents of Telangana or natives of Telangana, but having studied in arry other State, including the newly created State of Andhra pradesh, G.O.Ms.No.15O, dated 08.09.2025, is bad in law so far as it does not allow them to be treated as local candidates for the State of Telalgana for the purpose of admission to MBBS/BDS course in the medica-l institutions in the State of Telangana.

4. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners have taken this Court to G.O.Ms.No.l14, dated OS.O7.2O1Z, which was amended by G.O.Ms.No.33, dated lg.OT.2024, by the State of Telangana and also G.O.Ms.No.150, dated 4 .i* O8.0g.2O25, providing amend'ment to Rule 3(a) of the Telangana Medical and Denta-l Colleges Admissions (Admissions into Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery & Bachelor of Dental Surgery Courses) Rules' 2Ol7 (hereinafter referred to as, "the Rules")' in the manner prescribed therein' Learned Senior Counsel submits that the Apex Court has upheld G O'Ms'No'33' dated 19.07.2024, bttt G'O Ms'No' 150, dated 08'09'2025' is bad in law to the extent it does not provide for consideration of the persons like the petitioners for being treated as local candidates for the purpose of admission to MBBS/BDS course. It is also argued that most of the students had completed their qualifying examination before G.O.Ms.No.33 came into existence and even G.O.Ms.No' i50 came into existence' Therefore' their cases ought to have been consid'ered under G'O'Ms'No' 114' dated O5.07.2O17. The petitioners, therefore' seek to question the validity of G.O'Ms'No'150, dated 08'09'2025' in particular and a declaration that they be treated as local candidates for the purpose of admission to MBBS/BDS course in the State of Telangana. I t \ I i t I 5

5. Learned Standing Counsel for the Universitlz and the Assistant Government pleader for the State both have strongly opposed the prayer. It is submitted that G.O.Ms.No.33, dated 19.02.2024, was read down by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Kalluri Naga Narasimha Abhiram v. State of Telangana (W.p.No.21910 of 2024 and batch, decided on O5.O9.2O24). The Apex Court, in the chailenge made thereto, had by judgment dated 01.09.2025 rendered in State of Telangana v. Kalluri Naga Narasimha Abhiram (CA @ SLp (C) Nos.21536-21588 of 2024) set aside the judgment of this Court and upheld G.O.Ms.No.33, dated 19.O2.2024, with the only reservation which mitigates the grievances of those who claim that they were taken out of the State by compulsion of the movement of their parents outside the State by reason of employment in Government/Al1_India Services/ Corporations or public Sector Undertakings constituted as an instmmentality of the State of Telangana as also defence and paramilitary forces who trace their nativity to the State, subject to the conditions proposed to be incorporated in Rule 3 of the Rules as per the -_t I i i ,l \ i , ; i. I I a t 1 I I I I i I I uI 6 .{ submission of the learned Advocate General before the i{on'ble Supreme Court lt contended that G.O.Ms.No.150, dated 05.O9.2025, has thus been introduced to bring G.O.Ms.No.33 in conformity with the judgment rendered by the Apex Court. It is submitted that the petitioners cannot fail in an]' of the categories cnumeratcd urrder G.O.Ms.No.33, dated' i9'O7 '2024' or G.O.Ms.No.150, dated O8.O9.2025, fcr being treated as locai candidates of t1-re State of Telangana' Since the issue res integra, this Court '*ould refrain from 15 no longer questioning the validity of G'O'l\1s'No' 150, dated

08.09.2025 a-fresh

6. We have given anxiotts consiCeral ion to the submissions of the learned counsel for thc parties' 7 . To trace the genesis of the instant litigation arising out of the enforcement of C.O.lvIs.No'33, dated 19'O7 '2024' issued by the State of Teiangana by amendment to G.O.Ms.No.114, dated 05.O7.201,7, we may usefully refer to the decision of this Court rendered in a batch of writ petitions led by W.P.No.2191O of 2024 decided on 7 O5.O9.2O24. The learned Coordinate Bench of this Court by the said judgment had held that Rule 3(a) of the Rules as amended by G.O.Ms.No.33, dated lg.OZ.2024, would be interpreted to mean that the petitioners shall be eligible to admission in the medical colleges in the State of Telangana, if their domicile is of State of Telangana or if they are permanent residents of the State of Telangana. The Government was gralted liberty to frame the guidelines/rules to determine as to when a student can be considered as a permanent resident of the State of Telangana. Those writ petitions were disposed of with a direction that the petitioners therein shall be treated as local candidates and if otherwise eligible, shall be admitted to MBBS/BDS course as per their eligibility. The matter was taken to the Apex Court by the aggrieved State of Telangana. Before the Apex Court, besides other grounds supporting G.O.Ms.No.33, dated 19.O2.2024, it was also submitted by the State that an amendment is proposed as a proviso to the impugned Rule 3 of the Rules to mitigate the grievances of those who were tal<en out of the State by compulsion of the movement of their pa_rents outside the l i 8 State by reason of employment in Government/All-india Services/ Corporations or Public Sector Undertakings constituted as an instrumentality of the State of Telangana as also defence and paramilitar5z forces u'ho trace their nativity to the State, subject to the conditions laid down therein. The Apex Court, while upholding the amendment to the Rules incorporated through G'O'Ms'No'33' dated 1g.O7.2024, also observed that the said proviso proposed to be introduced to Rule 3 of the Rules should allay and mitigate the grievances of those who claim that they were taken out of the State by compulsion of the movement of their parents outside the State by reason of employment in Government/All-India Services/Corporations or Public Sector Undertakings constituted as arr instrumentality of the State of Telangana as also defence and paramilitary forces who trace their nativity to the State' G O'Ms'No' 150 was notified on 08.09.2025 to bring it in conformity to what was proposed and upheld by the Apex Court in the judgment rendered in State of Telangana v' Kalluri Naga Narasimha Abhiram (CA @ SLP (C) Nos'21536-2 1588 of 2024, d,ecided on 01.09.2025). It is, therefore' clear that ! I I I I I i I , i 9 G.O.Ms.No.150, dated 08.09.2025, is a result of the adjudicatory process which has attained Iinality on the decision rendered by the Apex Court in State of Telangana v. Kalluri Naga Narasimha Abhiram - (CA @ SLP (C) Nos.21536-21588 of 2024, decided on O1.09.2025).

8. The petitioners, by virtue of their claim of being natives of the State of 1'elangana, but have studied elsewhere or in the neighbouring State of Andhra Pradesh, do not fali within any of the provisions contained in G.O.Ms.No.33 or G.O.Ms.No. 150

9. Since the validity of G.O.Ms.No.33, dated 19.O7.2024, stands upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, and G.O.Ms.No.150, dated Oa.Og.2025, has been issued in light of the decision rendered by the Apex Court, it is not open for this Court to revisit it. \

10. In view of the aforesaid reasons, the petitioners cannot claim to fall within the definition of 'local ( candidate" for the purpose ol admission to MBBS/BDS 10 course in the State of Telangana in tire medical institutions for the session 2025-2026.

11. It is u,orth pointing out that this Court, following the decision of the Division Bench of this Court Kalluri Naga Narasimha Abhiram v. State of Telangana (W.P.No.21910 of 2024 and batch, decided on 05.09.2024), and also taking into account that the maLter was sub judice before the Apex Court, had granted interim orders in favour of such petitioners for making their application for admission to MBBS/BDS course for the session 2025-2026, .rhrch was subject to outcome of the pending matter. Since the issue has been finally deterrnined by the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in State of Telangana v. Kalluri Naga Narasimha Abhiram (CA @ SLp (C) Nos.21536-2 15BB of 2024, decided on 01.09.2025), the petitioners herein cannot be permitted to sa5, that the interim orders passed in such nature would also apply in , I favour of the petitioners any more. ]- i * ! \ I I I I ! I I I I I

12. Taking into consideration a-11 the above facts and circumstances and the reasons recorded above, we do not find any merit in these writ petitions.

13. The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed. Holuever, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applica[ions pending, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR G. SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Union of lndia, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi - 1 1001 1 .

2. The Secretary (HE), lvlinistry of Education, Union of lndia, '109-C, Shastri Bhawan New Delhi - 1 10001 .

3. The Principal Secretary, Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

4. The Registrar, Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, (KNRUHS), Nizampura, Warangal, Telangana

5. One CC to SRI SUBBA RAO POSANI, Advocate. [OPUC] 6 One CC to SRI K.L.N.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY, Advocate. [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department,, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

8. One CC to SRI T.SHARATH, SC for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, Warangal. [OPUC] 9 Two CD Copies. BSK BS ({ HIGH COURT DATED:1710912025 CC TODAY .. ,-:|4 -*,, -, .,.. !,: 'ri + () 1:t StP 2025 - .,t t1 1,. i;' COMMON ORDER WP.No.27925 & 28076 of 2025 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS l> *?rnak*\4r\1,"