RAO, S/o v. Surayanarayana, aged about

3. K. Srinivasi Murthy, S/o K.V. Raja Narasimham, aged about i5 years, Occ Assistant Commissioner and Ex6cutive Officer, Sii Lakshmi Verikateswara Swamy Temple, Manyamkonda, Mahabubnagar District.

4. The A.P. Administrative Tribunal, rep. by its Registrar, purana Haveli, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of certiorari (a) to call for the records relating to and connected with the impugned orders of the Honble A.P. Administrative Tribunat dt. 21 .11.2O14 in O.A.No. SOSS12O12 and quash or set-aside the same (b) to call for the records connected with the Proc.Rc.No. D315423312O1O-6, dt. 06.06.2012 of the l't respondent and declare the same as without any authority of law and as such selaside the same (c) further declare that the respondents 1 and 2 have no power of review in regard to the Proc.Rc.No' E5/26319/2003, dt. 22.03.2005 either under the A.p. CHARITABLE ANd HINDU RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS ANd ENDOWMENTS Acr, 1987 or otherwise (d) to decrare that the petitioner cannbt be reverted from the post of Assistant commissioner of Endowments as he was promoted to the said post regularly In pursuance of G.O.Rt.No. .l 165, dt. 28.0g.2O11. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WP MP. NO:464 180F 20141 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to continue the as Assistant Commissioner of Endowments by suspending the orders of the Hon'bre A.p. Administrative Tribunar dt.21 .11.2014 in o.A.No.5O55r2o12 and Proc.Rc.No. D3t54233r2010-6, dt. 06.06.20'12 0f the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ petition. petitioner impugned t.A. NO: 20F 2014(WP MP. NO: 46501 O F 20141 in the Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the crrcumstances stated affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to the respondents herein to produce the Note Fire c.No. d irect 42006/Endow r(1)r2012 for perusar by this Hon'bre court, pending disposar of the main Writ Petition. l.A. NO:'l oF2016(WV MP. NO : 3620 OF 2016) Between: Hyderabad. (Now State ot rerJngl;;'i''

1. The Commissioner of . Endowments, A.p., Bogulkunta, Tilak Road, 2. The State of Telangana,^ rep.by its principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments.t I oepartrient,'seci6iliiat,''ivolr.'ijo-soo ozz AND ...PETITIONER 1 V. RANGA RAO. S/o V. Sursyansl6yana, a_ged about 60 years, Assistant Com m issioner of E-ndownienti, S-u"r"'0"Jil'oad, Rl/o. Endowments Cotony, Ramantnapui, Hy.G;"6;;.' -"'' Occ Retired 3-3-64tB,6tF, i !i I ;l i 2 K. Srinivasa Murthv. S/o K.V. Raja Narasimham, aged about 55 years. Occ Assista nt commis{ioner a no. exzcutiie* onii"l, " sili"kshm i Verikateswa ra swamy Tempte, Manyamkonda, fi,laniouonag;; b[i'ri"i. Iffi.AI;oo'inistrative Tribunal, rep. bv its Registrar, purana Haveti, 3 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the inteirm order granted on 03-12.2014 in wpMp No. 46418 0f 2014 in WP No. 37092 ot 20.t4 and batch. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI K.LAKSHMANA RAJU Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 & 2: cp FOR SERVICES_I Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI SHIVA Counsel for the Respondent No.4:__ WRIT PETITION NO: 3709 3 0F 2014 Between K. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, S/o K. -Ramanaiah, aged about 5g years, Occ Retired Assistant Commisi.ioner or Enoo*h*e,iti"h)o. H.No. B_1 _40/A.t 62, Samatha Colony, Shaikpet, HvOeraOaO-_S-O"O Oij8.''"' '- AND ...PETITIONER 3 2

1. The Commissioner of End Road, Hyderabad. owments' state of Telangana' Bogulkunta, Tilak The State of Telanoana,^ rep.by its principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments.t) Departrient,'SeciEiaiiat,' ilyoli.rLl"jboo ozz. [::i!:q*fr 'Hof#tt{i:ytru:BH:a[.1p?X,rT#tt'"JeTd_?:: Swa m y Tem p I e, Man ya m ko nd a, M J ni i,i, oi5il r",: b i.i'ri"i. 4. B. Krishna, S/o B. Sumeder, ag-ed-about 4p y_ea1s, Occ Superintendent, 0/o. The Reqional Joint Commissioner of tndowments, Multi Zone_lll, Boggutakunta, Titak Road, Hr,ff;ift .' 5. S. Raghavender Rao. S/o. S.. Srinivasa Rao, aged about 49 years. Occ Superintendent. 0/o the l+ta;i c;ri,il"ib,i"" of Endowments. Ranoa Redd y District, Boggura kunia, tii; r niij,'iiviiilj blo. 6. V. Viiaya Rama Rao. S/o V. Laxma Rao, aged_ aboul 42 years, Occ superintendent. 0/o. The nssistant com-mi;;l;#i,; Endowments, Khammam RL.jffilr#: H.No. ro_+_ie,'-Givrii" Xp;hments, Mamilasudem, I l I 7 I T. Rajendram, S/o Sri Kanakaiah, aged about 49 years, Occ Executive Officer on F.S. Superintendent, Sri Veerabhadra Swamy Temple, Kuvari, Warangat. The A.P. Administrative Tribunal, rep.by its Registrar, Purana Haveli, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Certiorari (a) to call for the records relating to and connected with the impugned orders of the Honble A.P. Administrative Tribunal dt. 21 .11.2014 in O.A.No. SO43\2O12 and quash or set-aside the same (b) to call for the records connected with the Proc.Rc.No. D315423312O10-2, dt. 06.06.2012 of the 1st respondent and declare the same as without any authority of law and as such set-aside the same (c) further declare that the respondents 1 and 2 have no power of review in regard to the Proc.Rc.No. E5/26319/2003, dt.22.O3.2OOS either under the A.p. CHARITABLE and HINDU RELIG|OUS |NST|TUTIONS and ENDOWMENTS ACT, 1987 or otherwise (d) to declare that the petitioner cannot be reverted from the post of Assistant Commissioner of Endowments as he was promoted to the said post regularly in pursuance of G.O.Rt.No. 1 t65, dt. 28.09.2O11. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 46419 0F 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou( may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to continue the petitioner as Assistant Commissioner of Endowments by suspending the impugned orders of the Hon'ble A.P. Administrative Tribunat dt. 21 .11.2O14 in O.A.No. 504312012 and Proc.Rc.No. D315423312O10-2, dt. 06.06.20'12 of the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. l.A. NO: 2OF 2O14(WPMP. NO: 46500 OF 2014I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to produce the note File C.No.42006/ Endow.l(i ) 12012 for perusal by this Hon'ble Court, pending disposal of the main Writ petition. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(wVMP. NO: 3618 OF 20161 Between:

1. The Commissioner of Endowments, State of Telangana, Bogulkunta, Tilak Road, Hyderabad.

2. The State o (Endowments.l f Telangana, rep.by its Princioal Secretarv- ) Department, Secretaiiat, Hyderabdd-500 022. Revenue ...PETITIONER AND 1 2 3 4 5 K. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, .S/o K. _Ramanaiah, aged about 58 years, Occ -A_i_+OTArOZ Retired Assistant Commiss.ioner of Endowments,-R/o. H.No. Samatha Colony, Shaikpet, Hyderabad-500 008. K. Srinivasa Murthy, S/o K.V. Raja Narasimham, aqed about 55 vears. Occ Assistant commissioner and Executive officer, Sii Lakshmi verikatedwara Swamy Temple, Manyamkonda, Mahabubnagar bistrict. B, Kristna, S/o B. Sumeder, aged about 49 years, Occ Superintendent, 0/o. Ih" Regionat . Joint Commissioner of 'Endowments, ' Muiti -Zoiie-if Boggulakunta, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. S. Raghavender Rao, S/o S. Srinivasa Rao, aoed about 49 vears. Occ Superintend.ent, 0/o. The Assistant Commissione-r of Endowmeits, fi"ndi Reddy District, Boggulakunta, Tilak Road, Hyderabad. Y. Vrj.aya Rama Rao, S/o V. Laxma Rao, aged about 42 vears, Occ Superintendent, Oio. The Assistant Commissionerbf Endowments,'Khammam qistrict, Rl/o. H.No. 10-4-18, GAVRR Apartments, MiiniiiagJJ;, Khammmam. f , 6 T. Rajendram, S/o Sri Kanakaiah, aged about 49 years, Occ Executive Officer on F.S. Superintendent, Sri Veerabhadra Swamy tempie, Xuvari, Warangii.- 7 The A.P. Administrative Tribunal, rep.by its Registrar, purana Haveli, Hyderabad. Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted on 03.12.2014 in WpMp No. 464.19 of 2014 in WP No. 37093 of 2014 and batch. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.LAKSHMANA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2,4 to 7: Gp FOR SERVICES-I Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI SHIVA Counsel for the Respondent No.8:-- The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SRIIUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA WRIT PETITION Nos.37(B2 AND 37093 0F 2014 COMMON ORDER: (per Hon,bte Sri |ustice Abhinand Kumar Shavili) When the matters are taken up for hearing, it is noticed that the petitioners filed o.A.Nos.5043 and 5055 of 2012 before the \ \ Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short, 'the Tribunal'), challenging the reversion orders and the Tribunal was pleased to dismiss the same oide common order, dated \ \ /

21.11.2014 and aggrieved by the same, the present Writ petitions are filed. It is further noticed that this Court, oiile interimorder, dated 03.1,2.2014, was pleased to grant interim direction that the petitioners shall not be reverted. It is further noticed that the petitioners are aged about 57 and 56 years, respectively, at the time of filing the subject O.As., which would mean that the petitioners have retired from service.

2. Since there was an interim direction not to revert the petifioners, the purpose of filing the Writ petitions is achieved. Further, as the peritioners have retired from service, this Court is of the considered view that the cause in the present writ petitions does not survive for adjudication.

3. Accordingly, both the Writ petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in these Writ Petitions shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.N. SRIHARI EPUTY SECTION OFFICER To ',. On" CC to SRI K'LAKSHMANA RAJU' Advocate [OPUCI

2. One CC to SRI SHIVA, Advocate [OPUC] 3 Two CCs to GP FoR SERVICES-I, High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad [OUTI 4 BSR GJP Two CD CoPies \r HIGH COURT DATED: 1310212025 COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.37092 and 37093 ot 2014 1 t 14i A (_, ', .t- 11 JUL 206 z .(,)L -\- i,: ),' CLOSING BOTH THE WRIT PETITIONS, WITHOUT COSTS (* 7-D l*