THOUSAND AND FOUR v. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 02 Dec 2004
- Bench
- P S NARAYANA
Outcome
Dismissed
the said representation, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 s. 277
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The Commissioner, Tenali Municipality, Tenali, Guntur District. .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or order particularly one in…
Judgment
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA W.P.No.6152 of 1997 Between: The Tenali Vegetable Market Wholesale Merchants Welfare Association, Tenali, represented by Its President, Lingineni Krishna Rao, R/o. Tenali, Guntur District. .. Petitioner Vs.
The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
Special Commissioner & Director of Municipal Administration, Hyderabad.
Tenali Municipal Council, represented by its Chair Person, Tenali, Guntur District.
Operative part
The Commissioner, Tenali Municipality, Tenali, Guntur District. .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ or order particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the Gazette Notification published in the month of February 1997 in Guntur Extraordinary District Gazette No.XIII as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.21, M.A., dated 5-1-1996 and Section 277 of A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 and for a consequential direction directing the 3rd and 4th respondents to collect the Market Fees as fixed by the 1st respondent in G.O.Ms.No.21, dated 5-1-1996. Counsel for the petitioner : Sri K.Sivakumar Reddy Counsel for the respondents : Government Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following : ORDER: Sri K.Sivakumar Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the writ petitioner states that the Writ Petition became infructuous. In view of the said representation, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. _________________ P.S.Narayana.,J Date : 2-12-2004 AM To:
1. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. Special Commissioner & Director of Municipal Administration, Hyderabad.
3. Tenali Municipal Council, represented by its Chair Person, Tenali, Guntur District.
4. The Commissioner, Tenali Municipality, Tenali, Guntur District.
2 copies to Government Pleader for Revenue, High Court of A.P. High Court buildings, Hyderabad.
2 C.D. copies
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the said representation, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 — s. 277.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 02 Dec 2004. The bench was P S NARAYANA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.