The High Court · 2025

2. Sri Vuddepally Hussain, S/o Aggi Ramulu, Aged about 30 years, Caste.Sc Madiga, Occ: AE Mothkur TGSPDCL, R/o Janpahad, Palakeedu mandal, Suryapet District. ...RespondenUDe-facto Complainant Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pf eased to quash SC- SPL.No.812025 on the file the Hon'ble Spl. Sessions court for trail of SC/ST (POA) Act Cum ll Additional District and Session Court, Nalgonda district, at Nalgonda. l.A. NO: 1OF 2025 Between: Sri Vuddepally Hussain, S/o Aggi Ramulu, Aged about 30 years, Caste-Sc tvladiga, Occ: AE fvlothkur TGSPDCL, R/o Janpahad, Palakeedu mandal, Suryapet District. ...Petitioner/De-facto Complai nant AND

1. The State of Telangana, through Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. Sri. Bashaboina Thirupathaiah, S/o Buggaiah, Aged about 42 years, Caste Yadva, Occ: ADE TGPDCL, R/o H.no.3-143/2, Sreesha Enclave Narapally Village, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal Malkajgiri district, N/o Kurella Village, Athmakur [\rlandal ... RespondenUGomplainant ... RespondenUAccused Petrtion under Section 359(6) BNSS praying that irr the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to compound the offences with the Respondent nos.2 /Accused herein since compromised and quash all the proceedings in SC.SPL. No B of 2025 as against the Quash Petitioner i.e., the Accused in SC.SPL. No 8 of 2025 pending on the file The hon'ble Spl. Sessions Court for trail of SCiST (POA) Act Cum ll Additional Districl and Session Court, Nalgonda district, at Nalgond a. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying thal in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petitiorr, the High Court may be pleased to compound the offences with the Responrlent nos.2 /Accused herein since compromised and quash all the proceedingsr in SC.SPL. No 8 of 2025 as against the Quash Petitioner i.e.. the Accused in IiC.SPL. No 8 of 2025 pending on the file The hon'ble Spl. Sessions Court for trail of SC/ST (POA) Act Cum ll Additional District and Session court, Nalgonda Distr ct, at Nalgonda. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the l\4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the .rrguments of Sri G. Shashidhar Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and thr> Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of M/s. M. Manisha, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER =-:---:=' ' 4.:' THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 in/an d CRIMINAL PETITION No.12035 of 2025 COMMON ORDER This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash lhe proceedings against him in S.C.SPL.No.B of 2025 on the file of learned Special Sessions Court for Trail of SC/ST (POA) Act-cum-Vll Additional District and SessionS Court, Nalgonda District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 (for short 'BNS') and Section 3(1 )(r) of SC and ST (POA) Act-2015

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused as well as respondent No.2/de faclo complainant that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.'1 and 2 of 2025 have been filed seeking permission to compound the offence and to quash the proceedings in the above SC

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions. l;1 2 all) t

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de factir conrplainant l.A.Nos.1 ard 2 of 2025 which disclose that rr: has willingly consented for compronrise. Since [l're parties werr: rvilling to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to set l() the matter by appearing along with [herr respective counsel befor: the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telancana vlde orders dated 16.09.2025 passed by this Court. The Secrirt;rry, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the partir s and submit a report to that effect

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by thrs Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have app,:ared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identifred the parties and submrtted a report dated 23.09.2025 stating that th'-- parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise

6. ln view of the above, lA.Nos.1 and 2 of 202o are allowed Consequently. the Criminal Petition is allowed and 'he proceedings in S.C.SPL.No.B of 2025 on the frle of learned S:i:cial Sessions Court for Trail of SC/ST (POA) Acfcum-Vll Additional District and Sessions Court, Nalgonda District, registered against the petitioner/accused, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner/accused paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, State Bank of India, Shantinagar Branch (2o}7o), IFSC Code:SBlNO02OO70, MICR No 500004057) and Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02)weeks from today and flle proof of the same before the Registry.

7. l/iscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed' //TRUE COPY// SD/- B REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6 SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Special Sessions Court for trail of SC/ST (POA) Act Cum ll Additional District and Session Court, Nalgonda District, at Nalgonda

2. The Station House Officer, Bhongir Rural Police Station, Yadadri Bhongir District.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana al Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri G. Shashidhar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Mi s. M, [\ilanisha, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Along with a Copy of Joint lvlemo of Compromise) NOTE : Total Amount of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri G. Shashidhar Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 07-10-2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only )to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.1 15154 of 2025 dated 16-10-2025. r-W*)vr. ' ,i "l HIGH COURT DATED:0711012025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 in/and CRLP.No.12035 ot 2025 I ,! 0 liill 295 \- ':.,'- " .11', , ,i.r-,' \-:_--;/- ?r, t BOTH l.As AND CRIMINAL PETITION ARE ALLOWED a ) 1,f4 Tllro 71 1 I I N THE HON,BLE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD r.A NO oF .. ":1 2o2s IN CRLP' No' ] J"'l^-- of 2025 (On THE FILE OF SPL' SESSIONS COTJRT FOR TRAIL OF SC/ST(POA) ACT CUM II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION COURT' NALGONDA DISTRICT) \0 Between: Sri. Ba sha boina ThiruPathaia h, S/o Buggaiah, Ag ed about 42 Years, Caste Yadva' Occ: ADE TGPDCL, R/ o H.no. 3-743/2, Sreesha Enclav e NaraPallY Vlllage, Ghatkesar Mandal, Medchal Malkajg iri d istrict, N/o Kurella Village, Athmaku r Mandal. AND

1.The State of T.S. through Public Prosecutor, Hlgh court of Telangana' Petitioner/Accused Respo ndents/Com Plaina nt

2.Sri Vuddepally Hussain S/o Ahhi Ranrrrlu' aq;O aUout :o Years, Caste: Sc Madiga. oi., ni u",r.rkur TGSPDCL, R/o Janpahad' palakeedu mandal, suryapet District .. pespondent/De-facto complainant JOINT MEMO May rt Please mY Lord ! 1. It is humbly submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the [he police' Bhongir' Rual registered a Respondent no'.Z/Defacto complainant ' case in crime no. :2g5/2O24 Uls 352' 351(2) BNS' 3(r)(r) of Sc' ST POA Act 2015 and tool( up investigation Later' llre ACP' Bhongir' after concluding the investigation, fired charge sheet array ng the quash Petitioner as the sole accused, and the same ls pending vide SC' SPL No' B/2O25 on the fite The Hon'ble THE hon'ble Spl Sessions court for trail of SC/ST (PoA) Act Cum II \ w4 Additional District and Session court, Nalgonda distr ct, Al: Nalgonda same is pending ti-ia I and the and Defa cto cornplainant 2024 both of them htve sen ior co Ileague nanrely ering was socia l, vibrant nr using event, h aving cf the quash petittoner,

2. Il is humbll, submitted that. the euash petitiorrer are colleagues, and employed by TGSpDCL. On 11.09. attended a farr:l,yell party hosted rn honour of thei; Sri. Srrnath, wIro retired as SE(operations). Said gatir and filled with energetic atmosphere. During said .. nrrsconstrued thr: friendly banter and witty rernarks the DeFacto conrplainant got oFfended and has Iodgec_ against quash petitroner. Later, during pendency rntervention of therr colleagues and well wrshers, Defacto co,x p le ina nt misunderstandings, 1-he above complaint as cf above case, due to the llash petitioner and the amicably resolved ali their disputes and have arrived at a clrnpromise. In abor'e crTCU,stances' Defacto comprainant has voruntarily a,::cepted to withdraw *re case with an inteirtion to setre the crisputes with thc Accused/petiIio.er. rn view of arricabre set,ement of a, [heir disputes, the Defacto-comprainant h;rs beconte signatory to this joint memo. I I I I :;etted a, their dis PU t€:S It is humbry submitted that since the parties hav€ 3) rn out of court se present ,]oint merr ag a inst the quasr SPL.No. 8/2025 on trail of SC/ST (pOA district, At: Nalgonda. Hence this memo Date:IZ.f 2025 ttlement, they are rcporting compr:rnise by way ol. Filing o- praying the Hor-rble court to quasl all the proceedings as petitioner who is are arrayed as sc e Ac:used in vide SC. the file The Hon,ble THE hon,ble Spl. Sessions court tor ) Act Cum II Additional District and S:ss ron court, Na lgonda -d'.ti)n^ li _ _-- _r, ion erl Ac,:use d 1 Petit Complainant/R esp(rn ent o.2 [^rxu- Lounsel lor Lhe Fespr ndenLs Counsel for t he Peti ETS