✦ High Court of India · 19 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 19 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
19 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,003 words

Acts & Sections

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRl. P SRI HARSHA R:rr)DY SC FOR Singareni Colleries The Court made the following: ORDER "7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KIIMAR ORDER: w.P. No.28O3O of 2025 Heard the Iearned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents and with their consent this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the respondent No.6, District Court, represented by its presiding Ofhcer, Khammam District, in not deciding the claim statements filed by the petitioners in LAOP. No.3 of 2019 on the file of the respondent No.6 and not depositing the compensation amount of Rs.10,95,000/- per acre on par with other land losers, though submitted possession certificate issued by the Tahsildar, Sathupalli Mandal and other relevant documents establishing clear title though there are no rival claimants against the petitioners hled the present writ petition with a consequential prayer to direct the respondent No.6 to disburse / deposit the compensation amount of Rs. 10,95,000/- per acre on par with other land losers duly deciding the claim statement filed by the petitioners as expeditiously as possible with interest @ l8/o per annum.

3. Today, when the malter has been taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in similar set of facts and circumstances, this Court disposed of the W.P. No.26489 of 2025 on 03.09.2025 directing the respondent No.6 t \ l L I %!...- \' - to consider the claims of the petitioners therein in L. .,fP. No.B of 2019 and pass aopropriate orders and prayed to pass s;:-i1al order in the present writ. petition.

4. The k:arned Assistant Government Pleadcr fr: I .-and Acquisitron does not diripute the submission made by the lcarrr ri counsel lbr the petitioner.

5. In thzrt view of the matter, recording the slL[r;'tissions made by the learned counsel on eiLher side, this '"vrit petitior L is ciisposed of ir-r terms of the order dated C3.09.202.5 passed in W.P. l',to.26489 of 2025 by this Ccurt directing the rcspondenl No.5 to corLs.cler Lhc ctaims oI the petitioners herein in LAOP. No.3 of 2019 an, t,ass appropriate orders, in accordance r.,r,ith lavr, rvithin a perr':,1 o1' six u'ceks, frorrr the dat:e of receipt of a copy of this orcler.

6. The Registry is directed to append a copy o .,hc order dated

03.O9.2025 passecl in W.P. No.26489 ol 2025 b5' this rJourt along with this order.

7. In the result, this writ petition is disposed of. '-herc shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, niscellaneous applications, :f any pending, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// K.BHAVANI SWAMY I $TANT REGISTRAR / ,SPr- A:'' 'lsEcTtoN oFFtcER 1 The Princip-al Secretary, Revenue Department (Land Ac luisition) Secretarrat Buildings, State of Telangana, Hyderabad, Telangana .1:: 0063 ,,--- "_- -----".:--.t!.Er .-:€r_- = 2 The Managing Director, Corporate Offrce, Singareni Colleries Co.Ltd, Red Hills, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Khammam District, Telangana. The Revenue Divisional Officer (LA)(RDO), Khammam District, Telangana The [,4andal Revenue Officer, Sathupally tr,4andal, Khammam District District, Telangana The Presiding Officer, District Court,Khammam, Khammam Distrjct. One CC to SRl. ABDUL AZAIV KHAN Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRt. P.SRI HARSHA REDDY SC FOR Singareni Colleries Advocate tOPUCI Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana. Two CD Copies 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 '10 ASV GJP HIGH COURT DATED:1910912025 \ \ ORDER WP.No.28030 of 2025 :: I ./a ?: STP ?0ffi WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OF WITHOUT COST Qzt ,/ n,l\-

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments