1. Mala Jangaiah v. Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - S01 503

the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to amend the main prayer in W.P.No. 27797 ot 2O25 as "to issue the writ of c mandamus declaring the ilbction of revenue authorities in not issuing pattedar .( passbooks and title deeds, thereafter to entertain the.sale deed or sale deeds by I incorporation of petitioners names in Bhu Bharati portal as pattedars in possession i by implementing the orders 6f ttris Hon'ble Court in W.P'No. 3847 of 2025 Dl- 11 .02.2025 and the orderi' of the tahsildar Dt. 01.09.2025 in spite of I communication to the petitionqs through memo Bearing No. 812210512025 of the tahsildar Chevella Mandal as arbitrary illegal, malafide, high handed by violating the constitutional rights of the petitioners under article 14, 19, 21, 3004 of constitution of lndia by depriving the rights of the petitioners to sell and transfer the petitioners land to 3rd parties so as to come out of the overcome the existing financial difficulties of the petitioners and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case lnstead of to issue a writ or order moie particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of thdrevenue authorities in not issuing pattedar pass books : , .: and tige deeds there after Cnlertain of sate deed or sale deeds and in corporation of petitioners names in the Bhu Bharati portal bringing the petitioner as pattedar in possession by implementing. the orders of this Honble Court I submit that the petitioners had incurred 5u$'dents caused due to the borrows from various sources for the treatment of petitioner father and other finical problems that are i! ;-.v,' being faced by the petitioners and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble ,t 1.. Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. And further amend the interim prayer in l.A.No. of 2025 as:- lt is just and necessary that pending the.writ petition that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to order directing the 10th respondent tahsildar to issue pattedar passbooks, title deeds and incorporation of the names of the petitioners in Bhu Bharthi portal and entertain the sale deed or sale deeds presented by the petitioners for registration in favour of 3rd party purchaser or purchasers as the petitioners to overcome the financial difficulties being faced by the petitioners and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and to meet the*ends of justice. lnstead of to order or orders directing the 10th respondent to issue pattedar pass books title deeds in cooperating of the names of the petitioners in Bhu Bharathi Portal deleting the name of late Mala Laxmaiah the petitioners'father of the land of Ac 325 Gts in Sy No 17lEE situated at Damergidda Village, Chevelra Mandal and Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI C. HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR GENERAL ADM|NISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No. 2, 4, I lo 10: SRI L. RAVINDER GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No. 3, 5, 6, 7 &11: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL I WRIT PETITION No.27797 of 2o25 ORDER This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: "...to issue a urit or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of tlrc reuenue authoities in not issurng pattedar pass books and title deeds, there after entertain of sale deed or sale deeds and in corporation of petitioners names in the Bhu Bharati portal bringing the petitioner as pattedar in possesston bg implementing the orders of this Honble Court. I submit that the petitioners had incurred huge debts caused due to the borrotus from vaious sources for the- treatment of petitioner father and other finical problems tltat are being faced bg the petitioners..."

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.2, 4, 8 to 10. Perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in the earlier round of litigation, the petitioners have filed a writ petition vide W.P.No.3847 of 2025 and this Court vide its order dated 11.O2.2025 has passed the following order: In view of the above submissions and since the Tahsildar-respondent No.6 has conferred with the power under Section 6 of the Act, 2O2O, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition directing the petitioners to file an online application in appropriate module of Dharani portal in terms of CCLA's Circular No.l/2021, dated 15.O1.2021 and Cricular No.l/2024, dated 28.02.2024 duly enclosing 2 the certificate under Section 38-E of the Ar:t and other relevant documents and in the event of filing of such an application, respondent No.6 is directing to conduct enquiry and after issuing notice to all the persons interested and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law, within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of the said application.

4. It is further submitted that pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the impugned memo has been issued by the official respondent No.lO - Tahsildar uide Memo No.Bl22lO/2025, dated 01.09.2025 and in the said memo it is an admitted fact that on detailed enquiry conducted and ve::ification of records including the Khasra Pahani of 1954-55, Pahanies of 1974-75, 1995-96 and subsequent years, it has been clearly established that Slurvey No.17 is Patta land to a total extent of Ac.16.25 guntas, and Sy.No.LTEE to an extent of Ac.3.25 guntas stands in the name of Sri Mala Laxmaiah, S/ o. Venka,iah, Pattadar, under Katha No.142 from 1995-96 onwards and continues to be so till date. It was further noticed that the land was erroneously shown as Prohibited Pr()perty citing O.S.No.204 of 2OO7 pending before the Senior Civil Judge, Chevella. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that a proposal was submitted to the com t 3 authority and deletion has been approved and implemented the Bhu-Bharathi Act. It is also been appeared that land is free from poB restrictions and no prohibition or encumbrance is reflected against the land of the petitioner and the said communication has been addressed to the petitioner. Despite the said communication addressed to the petitioner, the request made by the petitioner to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records has not been considered by the official respondents. Hence, he would seek to pass appropriate orders.

5. on the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that based on the application vide Dharani Ref. No.24ooo24T2s, dated 26.1r.2024 under TM- 15 Module seeking deletion of sy.No. 17 /EE to an extent of Ac.3.25 guntas situated at Damargidda village, chevella Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, upon due verification, the said survey number has been removed from the PoB list, in order to accede to the claim by the petitioner herein. After due verifigeli9-n._lbg 4 petitioner ought to have file an application under Rule 7 (21 of the Rules made under the Telangana. Bhu Bharathi (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025 (for short "the Act, 2025"1, unless such application has been made by the petitioner, the official respondents are not in a position to take action on the application filed by' the petitioner. Hence, he would seek to pass appropriate orders.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and upon vr-'rification of materials placed, this Court deems it appropriate to grant liberty to the petitionr:r to make an application under Rule 7 (21 of the Rules made under the Act, 2025 and upon such filing of applicat.irrrl, the official respondents shall examine the same in etccordance with law by issuing notices to all concerned and by affording them siufficient opportunity of hearinSl and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible, preferably, as the tirne prescribed under the Act, 2025.

7. With the above directions, this s,rit petition 1S disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/.C.DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGTSTRAR 6 SECTION OFFTCER To, - 500 022. Block, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderaba d _ SOOO22.

1. The chief secretary, state of relangana, secreteriat, Hydera bad _ so1 022. 2. The Principar secretary, Revenue Department (rand), secreteriat, Hyderabad 3. The Principal secretary to Home, Telangana Home Department, lll Floor, A 4' The Chief commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA), state of Telangana, 9FQF + w6s, Nampalry station Road, opp. Annapurna Hoter, SFRF + s, i.:.4$!dS,'Hyderabad, Telangana _S00 00 1 . 5. The Director General of police (DGp), Telangana, Lakdi pool police 6. The cyberabad police commissioner Gachibowli, Hyderabad _ s00032. 7. The ACP (Assistant commissioner of porice), cnevetta euarters 2, opposite chevella Bus Stop, chevefla, Ranga Reddy District - s01503 8. The District coilector, Ranga Reddy District, Kongara Karan Viilage 9. The Revenue Divisionar officer, cheveila Division, cheveila Vilrage and lbrahimpatnam, Kongara Kalan, Telangana _ SOt StO. Headquarters, Hyderabad _ 500004, Telangana. Mandal, Ranga Reddy District _ S01 SO3.

10. The Tahsildar / sub-Registrar, cheveila Mandar, Ranga Reddy District, g4ge + QVQ, shankarpa[i Road, rndra Reddy Nagar, Hyderabad, cheveila, Telangana - S01 SO3. 11'The Station House officer, Chevella Police Station, Ranga Reddy District - 501 503. .of lelargana. [OUTJ

12.One CC to SRt C. HANUMANTHA RAO, Advocate IOPUCI 13' Two CCs to GP FoR GENERAL ADMINISTRATIoN, High Court for the State 14.Two ccs to Gp FoR REVENUE, High court for the state of rerangana. 15.Two ccs to Gp FoR HOME, High court for the state of rerangana. tourl 16. Two CD Copies MMT PMK P .r'/ HIGH COURT DATED:1911112025 f-i WP.No.2779ltof 2025 02iic I :r. I c; "'.-.,- . .. r.. 1.r,,-.-il * i. ,.\,.? \,1\ : DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITON WITHOUT COSTS