The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondent No.3 and 4 in not conducting the survey for fixation of boundaries stones to the land in Sy., No. 141, situated at Puppalaguda Village, Gandipet Mandal, Manikonda Municipality, Ranga Reddy Dist.,TG, as per the revenue records and village map, for locating the petitioneas house bearing Plot No.25414 admsg..'100 Sq.,yards, whether it is situated in patta land Sy., No.141 or in government land in Sy. , No. 146, in spite of receipt of F-Line applications vide No DER022501134016, dated 29-01-2025, through MeeSeva, since then to till this date, as highly illegal, arbitrary, bad and contrary to the provisions of TS Revenue Act and violation of the Articles of the Constitution of lndia and consequently dlrect the respondents more particularly the respondent No.3 and 4 to fix the boundary stones to the patta land in Sy , No 1 41 ' situated at Puppalaguda Village Gandipet Mandal, t\ilanikonda Municipality, Ranga Reddy Dist., -LG. by conducting survey as per the revenue records and village map forthwith in accordance with law lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petrtion, the High court nray be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment over the house bearing plot No.254l4' admsg,100 Sq 'yards' in Sy,No's.1'16to1'18and136to'l43,situatedatPuppalagucaVillage'Gandipet Mandal, Manikonda Municipality, Ranga Reddy Dist,TG including demolition in any manner forthwtth. pendrng disposal of the above writ petttlon Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. BETHI VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondents: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER a a a c ( t I I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.27796 OF 202s ORDER: Heard learncd counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue.

2. Petitio,er herein is craiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of house in the plot bearing No.254 /4 admeasuring 100 sq.yards in Sv.No. i 16 to 1 1g and 136 to 143, situated at Puppalaguda Village, Gandipet Manclal, Manikonda Municipality, Ranga Reddy District, on the strength of registered sale deed bearing Documenr No.2856 of 2016, clated 06.06.2020. The 3r,r respondent has issued notice under Section 7 of the Land Encroachment Act, III of l9o5 stating that petitioner encroached the land admeasuring B0 sq.yards in Sy.No. 146 and seven (07) days time r.r,as granted to the petitioner to submit his explanation. Petitioner has submitted his explanation on 29.O1 .2025. On consideration of the said explernation, vide proceedings dated 22.o8.2025' the 3'r respondent directed the petitioner to vacate the said property. Challenging the said proceedings, the petitioner filed W.P.No.26294 of 2025. Vide order dated 02.09.2025, this Court disposed of the said r.r.rit petition granting iiberty to the petitioner to prefer zrn appeal u,ithirr tu,o (02) rveeks from the saicl 2 ( date and this court directed the appellatc auth.r itr. t. clispose of the said appeal u,ithin three (03) months. Whilc g,rantir.rg the said order, this Court granted protectiolt to the petitioner ht:rein. Now, he has file d the prcscnt \,\'rit petit.ion seeking sur\ e-\, ol- Sy.No. 141 of Puppalaguda Village by r.r,ay ol submitting Ir l_ine application vide I.D.No.TTDERO22SOl1340 16 dared 29.01.2025 claiming the subject propertl in S,v.No.l4l, r,vl-rich is a Governnrent land.

4. The subject l)ropertv is in puppalaguda Village u,hich comes under Manikonda Municipalit_v. A Circular was issuecl b-y CCLA vide Rc.No.N2/ 171l I lO, datccl I8.O5.20 l0 staring that conducting o[ su.r'cy in rcspect of the resicle,tiarl prots and also plots in Mur-ricipal area is not permissible. Ho."vcvcr, having received the said F Line application alor-rg u,ith Rs.2951, towards fee, the 3"1 rcsponclcnt should have informed the saicl f:rct to the petitioner herein instead of kecping it pending.

5. In the light ol thc same, the Writ petition s disposed of directing the 3.r rcspondent to consider the ilft,res.lrcl F_Line application sr-rbmitted by the petitioner and the recucst made by the petitioner and if l-rc is not inclined to accept thc rcclurr:st made bv the petitioner, he shall assign specific reasons, pass a reasoned order and communir:ate the copv of the same to the pctitioner. He 3 shall complete the entire exercise u,ithin forty five (45) working days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous applications, if an_v pending, shall stand closecl To, //TRUE COPY// SD/.B. REKHA RANI ISTANT RE ECTION OFFICER I T-G lbrahimpatnam Ranga Reddy Dist l G

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, TS Secretariat' at Hyderabad' z. in-e oistrict Collector, Ranga Reddy-District, Office at Kongarakalan ' s ine fafisiroar, Gand-ipeti/aridit, Gandipet, Ranga Reddy District' T G ; iii; D;ilU St;;t;;: M;;;;iH;*^,;'onice c"andipet Mandar' Ranga 5 ci;;tCi;' sRl BETHIvENKATESWARLU, Advocate toPucl 6 Two CCs to GP FoR REiiN"uelii'g'n'C""t toi t'e Sta'te of T6langanaAT 7. Two CD CoPies Hyderabad [OUT] Reddy Dist , TG BM BS \q- HIGH COURT DATED:1510912025 ORDER WP.No.27796 of 2025 i \ :t t GCI i I DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS cog?eA \o fro*