The High Court · 2025

The State of Telangana. Through Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, at Hyderabad.

2. Sri Gangi Mallesh, S/o Social Worker. R/o. H. Medchal- Malkajgiri Dis No. t angaiah, aged about 47 years, Occ Ex- Sarpanch/ 2- 12, Rampally - Dayara Village, Keesara Mandal, ..RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Cnminal Petitron, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the charge sheet in SC No. '19412020 in Crime No. 225 of 2O2O on the file of Special Court for Trial of Cases Under SC and ST POA Act cases cum Vll ADJ Court Cyberabad at L B. Nagar against Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 3 as the same is untenable either on facts or under law I.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that it the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition .re High Court may be pleased to STAY a further proceedings in SC No. 194/2(', O in Crime No. 225 of 2020 on the file of Speciar court for Triar of cases under s c and ST poA Act cases cum Vll ADJ Court Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar includir Ithe arrest of the Petitioners/Accused Nos 1 to 3. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2O25 Between: Sri Gangi Mallesh, S/o. Gangaiah, aged about 47 years Occ Ex_ Sarpanch/ ,S.ocjal Woge1, R/o H. No. z-iz, naripirry _b-ivrrjV,l .g: xee"ari-nrianoir, Medchal- Malkajgiri Dist. AND ...PETIT|ONER/R :SpONDENT No. 2 The State of Telangana, Through public prosecutor, Hrg. e6Llrt Burldings at Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT No. 1/F I SpONDENT No. 1 -78, 2 Kandaadi Srinivas Reddy, S/o Krishna Rampally Agriculture, R/o. H. 1- l/edchal- Malkajgrri Dist. Kaukutla Snkanth Reddy, S/o Sanjeeva Prrvate Job, R/o. H. 1- 27, Raipa y Medchal- Malkajgiri Dist. Kaukutla Chandra Shekhar Reddy, S/o ygarq, O.cg Agriculture, R/o. H. 1.. 26, Mandal, Medchal- Malkajgiri Dist. 3 4 Reddy. Dayara aged ) out 4Tyears Occ Vrllao€ Keesara Mandal Reddy, Dayara aged ;i )Jt 40 years Occ Vrllaq( Keesara Mandal, Lakshma Red I / Rampally Daya-; Village about 3'l Keesara ...RESPONDENT No. 2 to 4/pETt ' 3NER Nos. 1 to 3 Petttion under Section 35g(6) of BNSS praying that in .re circumslances stated In the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petitron. t r : High Court may be pleased to Permit the Respondent No.2 to Record the )ompromise and Quash the charge sheet in s.c.No.194/ 2020 in crme No 22 > of 2020 for the sections 506 tPC, Sec 3(2) (VA) OF SC, ST (pOA) ACT 1( .15 on the fite of special court for Triar of cases Under sc & sr poA Act ca ies cum vI ADJ Court Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar against petitioners/Accu sed Nos 1 to 3. // l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 /i Petition under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to Record the Compound and euash the charge sheet in S.C. No.'19412020 in Crime No.225 of 2O2O lor the sections 506 tpc, Sec 3(2) (VA) OF SC, ST (POA) ACT, 2015 on the fite of Speciat Court for Trial of Cases Under SC & ST POA Act cases cum Vll ADJ Court Cyberabad at L_B.Nagar against Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3. This Petition coming on for hearrng, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Govardhan Reddy Joundla, Advocate for the Petitioner, Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri MD. Raheem, Advocate for the Respondent No 2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTTCE TTRUMALA E't:VI EAOA l.A.Nos.2 &3 ol2O25 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.11970 of 2(t :s COMMON ORD ER l This Criminal Petition is filed under Sectiorr 52g of BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 in charge sheet irr S.C.No194 of 2020 in Crime No.225 of 2020, pending on the file < f Special Court for Trial of cases under sc & sr poA Act cases ctrr .r Vlr Additionar District Judge Court, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar, rr,r istered for the offence punishable under sections 506 of lpC, jg6( Sections 3(2) (va) of SC, Sr (POA) Act.

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel for the pet I oners/accused Nos.1 to 3 as well as respondent No.2 that during : rndency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compronr ;ed the matter and accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 have >een filed by respondent No.2/defacto complainant seeking,ermission to compound the offences, to record compromise an I to quash the proceedings against the petitioner in the above crime

3. The learned Additional public prosecutor has opposed the compromtse petition 2 Efo,t tANo\.2&3o12025 io/ond C.lp-No11910 ol 2025

4. Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to setfle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana wde orders dated I 0.1 1 .2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 18.11.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully, without any coercion, entered into compromise.

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings in charge sheet in S.C.No.194 ot 2O2O in Crime No.225 of 2020, pending on the file of Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC & ST POA Act cases sum Vll Additional District Judge Court, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar, are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying an amount of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- 3 EfD,] tANos.2&ioJ2025 n/ond otp.No11970 ol 2025 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the High Cour Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana, within a pr> iod of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before t : Registry. 7 . Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, sh a I stand closed. I,D/.B.REKHA RANI S TANT REGISTRAR ASS \ //TRUE COPY// iECTION OFFICER To, 1 The Special Court for Trial of Cases Under SC and ST t OA Act cases-cum- Vll ADJ Court Cyberabad at L. B. Nagar. 2 The Station House Officer, Keesara Police Str tron, Rachakonda Com m rssionerate. 3 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the {i rte of Teiangana at Hyderabad.IOUT] 4 One CC to Sri Govardhan Reddy Joundla, Advocate [OFL C] 5. One CC to Sn MD. Raheem, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of Joint Memo) NOTE : Total Amount of Rs 10,0001 (Rupees Ten thousand onh ) has been paid by Sri Govardhan Reddy Joundla, Counsel for the Petitioners as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 27.11.2025 as Rs. 5,0001 (Re rees Five thousand only) to the Telangana High Court Bar Association, Hydera ) rd, and Rs 5,0001 (Rupees Five thousand only) to the High Court Legal Servico: Committee for the State of Telangana and filed Memo as proof of compliance . SR No 143211 of 2025 and Receipt No. 1779 dated 10.12.2025. HIGH COURT DATED: 2711112025 \ I I l i I COMMON ORDER l.A. NO: 2 AND 3 OF 202 !N/AND CRLP.No.11970 of 2025 'i Er-,4, ir) a-G \l\ ,1 :l' -i i .\- U.l \a{.; :'-'.-/ ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION g IGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD CRL.P NO.11970 0F 2025 BETWEEN: KANDAADI SRINIVAS REDDY and others, THE STATB OF TELANGANA and Another ... PETTTTONERS/ ACCUSED NOS.1 to 3 AND .-. RESPONDENTS ''|, JOINT MEMO FILED BY PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT NO.2

1. It is submitted that the present Crirninal Petition is flled to Quash the charge sheet in S.C.No. 19a/2020 in Crimc No.225 of 2O2O for the sections 506 IPC, Sec 3(2) (VA) OF SC, S'l' (POA) ACT, 2015 on the hle of Special Court for Trial of Cases Under SC & ST POA Act cases cum VII ADJ Court Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar against Petitioners/Accused Nos. I to 3.

2. It is submitted that after frling the above Criminal Petition, the Respondent Nos.2 to 4/Petitioners herein had amicablv settled with Petitioner/ Respondent No.2 out of the court to the full and final satisfaction of both the parties. Both the parties hercl-o have also agreed to compromise all the disputes pending betr,veen them in the above case. In support of the said contention the required afhdavits of Respondent No.2 are being filed along with the Compromise Pelition with a request to record the comprornise and quash the impugned charge sheet in S.C.No.194/2O2O in Crime No.225 of 2O2O on the filc of Special Court for Trial of Cases Under SC & ST-POA Act cases cum VII }-S'VY ?L *9\"4rc$b ?z 1 wg-' ?3 (z ! * q ADJ Court Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar against pet tioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 3 Therefore in view of the Abo.,ze amicable settlert rnt, this Hon'ble Court may be please to quash thc impugned < harge sheet in S.C.No. l94l2O2O in Crime No.225 of 2O2O for the ; :ctions 506 IpC, Sec 3(2) (VA) OF SC, ST (pOA) ACT, 2015 on the filt, cf Speciat Court for Trial of cases Under SC & sr poA Act cases cur r vII ADJ court Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar against petitioners/Accused [' os. 1 to 3. Hence this Joint Memo, PLACI]: HYDERABAD DATtr: ,1 .o1.ao 2f COUNS R PtrTITIONER w Ft ]'ITIONER No.1 *: y'\I'oll+ifr+ I I ;TITIONER No.2 \, >.-. COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT No.2 FI TITIONER No.3 RIJ I ,ONDENT No.2 2