The High Court · 2025

Petition under section 528 of BNSS., praying that in the circumstances slated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in crime No. 347 of 2025 on the file of the Maheshwaram police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District, against the Petitioners/Accused No. 1 and 2 ...RESPONDENTS l.A. NO: 4 OF 2025 Between: Jannaoaoa @ Janvapaqa Balamani, Wo. Laxmaiah, Aged 64 years, Occ: Rgricuttuie, Rlo H No. 3--49, Dabilguda viltage, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ...PETITIONER/ 2nd resPondent r' I Q-;," '* AND 1 2 Ravi Varma @ Rudraraju Ravi Chandra Varma, S/o. ): tyanarana Raju, Age j8 years, Occ: Business, R/o Aparna Orchids, Hit:;,: iirlain Gate, izzatfia Nagar, Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District. Anjani-Kumar @ Kanakamedala Anjani Kumar, S/o t.anakamedal Satish, fOe l0 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 10-5-22t|. =tat No 403, Royai Comfort Apartments, Ahmed Nagar, tvlasab Tank. Asif .: gar. Humayunnag'ar, Hyderabad Drstrict. ...RESPONDNENTS/PETITIONER :;/ qCCUSED NO.1 & 2

3. The.State of Telangana,lhrough SHO tvlaheshwaram l:,.i . Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangan ; tt Hyderabad. ' ...RESPON l)l:NT/ RESPONDENT Petition under Section r/w 359 (2) of the BNSS lrraying that in the circumstances stated in the firlemorandum of Grounds o' r: rimin;l petition,the High Court may be pleased to record the compromis,, and to quash the proceedings in Crime No. 347 of 2025 on the file of the l,,l rheshwaram police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy Di-.:r,:t filed against the petitione rs/accused no. 1 and 2 by acquitting the a ;c rsed in terms of com p rom ise l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Jannapaga @ Agriculture, R/o Reddy District AND Janyapaga Balamani, Wo. Laxmaiah, ,, ,1 :d 64 years, Occ: H.No. 3-49, Dabilguda village, Maheshv, ?ram Mandal, Ranga ...PET|TlO Vl;R/ 2nd respondent 1 2 Ravi Varma @ Rudraraju Ravi Chandra Varma, S/o. S rt,,anarana Raju, Age j.8 Vears Occ: Business, R/o Aparna Orchids, Hite:, i/ain Gate, iziatHa Nagar, Kondapur, Ranga Reddy Distrrct. ^Kumar Q Kanakamedala Anjani Kumar, S/o. rr.z nakamedal Satish, Anjani {Oe a0 years, Occ: Business, R/o.'H.No. 1O-5-221D, : at No 403, Royai Comfort Apartments, Ahmed Nagar, Masab Tank, Asifr r-c,ar, Humayunnag'ai, Hyderabad District. ...RESPONDNENTS/PETITIONERS'A :CUSED NO.1 & 2

3. The State of Telangana, through SHO Maheshwaram p. i Represented bv Publrc Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana ;rl Hyderabad. ...RESPONDI]IJT/ RESPONDENT -ffi#i:':' ;. ?7 Petition under Section 359 (6) of the BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/respond ent no.2 to compromise the case in Crime No. 347 of 2025 on the file of the l\Iaheshwaram Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District filed against the petitione rs/accu sed no. 1 and 2. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 528 OF BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Crime No. 347 o'f 2025 on the file of the Maheshwaram Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P RAMULU, Advocate for the Petitioners in crl.petition and Respondent No.'1 and 2 in LA.No.3 and 4 of 2025 and the Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No l in crl.petition and Respondent No 3 in l.A.No.3 and 4 of 2O25 and of Sri S.GANESH, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 in crl.petition and Petitioners in l.A.No.3 and 4 of 2025 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER w:" /)z z4/ THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTTCE TIRUMALA ):Vt EADA l.A.Nos .3 and 4 of 2025 in/and CRIMIN AL PETITION No.119 '10 of 2 0,15 COMM oNo RDER: This Criminal petition is filed by the petitione r .s ,accused Nos.1 and 2 under Section s2g of BNSS, 2023 seek,,r! to quash the proceedings against them in crime No.347 0f 2(r:! on the fire of Maheshwaram police Station, Rachakonda ( <.r nmissionerate, registered for the alleged offences punishable unr. e sections 329 {3),324 (4) and 351 rlw.3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyay;: t:anhitha,2023 (for short'BNS') and Sections 3 (1) (g) and 3 2) (va) of The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes 1 rrevention of Atrocities) act, 19Bg (for short ,pOA Act,).

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel app, )a ring for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 as well as responder t No.2lde facto complainant that during pendency of the present c in rinal petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accorcl n yly, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2O2S have been filed seeking permission .o compromise and lo record the compromise.

3. The learned Additional public prosecutor has opposed the said compromise petitions. I I 2 ETD, J C p_l l9l0 2025

4. Perused the affidavits filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly consented for compromise_ Since the parties were willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to setile the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana yrde orders daled 12.09.2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counser have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 15.09.2025 stating that the parties were identified and they have wiilfuily and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise.

6. In view of the above, l.A.Nos.3 and 4 of 2O2S are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings in Crime No.347 of 2O2S on the file of Maheshwaram police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, registered against the 3 ETD. J Ctlp ll9l0 2025 petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2, arc hereby quas,r€ d subject to the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 paying an amc -l rt of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director lainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188926279, Stal , Bank of lndia, Shantinagar Branch (20070), IFSC Code:S81t 0020070, MICR No.500004057) and Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thot. sirnd Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, lli, th Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, within a period ( ' wo (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Re lir;try.

7. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, sl ,ail stand closed. SD/- IitTI OSMAN ALI BAIG ASI:illiTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To

1. The Junior civil Judge cum XVll Additional Judicral Ma,: is rate of First class at lt/aheshwaram, Ranga Reddy District.

2. The Station House officer, Maheshwaram police statio-. lachakonda District 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court for the st,rte of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to SRI P RAMULU, Advocate tOpUCI 5. One CC to Ms. S GANESH, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies (Along with a joint memo of Compromise) I)r/GRs NOTE: Total Amount of Rs ,l0,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by sri P.Ramulu, counsel for the petitioner as directed by the Hon,ble court vide order daled 22.09.2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand onry ) to the ,,Director, sainik welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only )to the High court Legal Sevices committee for the State of relangana, Hyderabad and filed lVlemo as proof of compliance USR No. 1los)z of 2025, dated o8-10-202s. HIGH COURT DATED:2210912025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos. 3 AND 4 OF 2025 IN/AND CRLP.No.1191O o12025 //- a'. i: 1 0 [[ )t]7q ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AND I.A'S P(5v $ . MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL PETITION (UNDER SEC. 528 OF THE BNSS) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT: HYDERABAD I.A.No. oF 2025 IN CRL.P.No. ) tTLo oF 2025 BETWEEN: 1 2 Ravi Varma @ Rudraraju Ravi Chandra Varma, S/o Satyanarana Raju, Age: 48 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Aparna Orchids, Hitex Main Gate, Izzatha Nagar, Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District. AnjaniKumar @ Kanakamedala Anjani Kumar, S/o Kanakamedal Satish, Age: 46 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 7O-5-221D, Flat No. 403, Royal Comfort Apartments, Ahmed Nagar, Masab Tank, Asifnagar, Humayunnagar, Hyderabad District. ..Petitioners/Accused no. 1 & 2 AND

1. The State ofTelangana through SHO Maheshwaram P.S. Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

2. Jannapaga @ Janyapaga Balamani, Wo. Laxmaiah, Aged: 64 years, Occ: Agi-iculture, R/o H.No. 3-49, Dabilguda village, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. . Respondent/ Responde nt JO NT MEMO FIL ED BY THE PETITIONERS AND 2ND NESPONDEITIT I

1. The above-named petitioners/accused presented this Memorandum of Criminal Petition seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No. 347 of V,T.' KD 5 2025 on the file of the Maheshwaram police :i1 ation, Rachakonda i Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District for the c t{:nses U/s. 329(3), 324(4), 3s7, r/w 3(s) of BNS and Sec. 3(1) (S), 3(; , va) of SC, ST poA Act against the petitioners.

2. while io, at the instance of erders and we -wr ;r ers and the matter the difference:s ieading to the dispute were sorted ou, In the interest and future all of tlrem intending to give an end tc ,he disputes have compromised as a resurt of sorting. It is submitted tr- )r. an orar agreement is reached befween us before the erders of both the p rt es and respondent no. 2 agreed to withdraw the case filed against peti. rt ter/accused in the above crime. It is submitted that the pefltioner and jl.( respondent no. 2 have settled the matter amicabry out of the cout in r 3 above said case and in view of the settlement arrived between the part ,:s, the respondent no. 2 does not ln/ant to proceed with the above case ar -l she does not have any objection to quash the proceedings in the above s;r rl case. . For the above reasons, It is therefore prayed th, : this Hon,ble Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in crime No. .i 17 of 2025 on the file of the Maheshwaram police Station, Rachakond Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District registered against the=petitioner:- ,; :cused no. 1 & 2 by acquitting the petitioners/accused no.1 & 2in terms -)1 compromise and to pass such other order or orders in the interest of Jus_ r:t r. 4Wy Q1$ _t)^. o l.Jannapa De-fdcto co a Balamani . No.2,

1. Ravi Varma @ Rudraraju Ravi Chandra Varma K

2. AnjanrKumar @ Kana medal Anjani Kumar {-"', CouncilYor Petitioner 1" ,fof ResPondent Council